"Standard Bibles" and Mediators as a Way of Software Development Organizations to Cope with the Multiplicity and Plurality of Standards

This paper focuses on the appearance and implementation of process standards in software development organizations. In particular, it shows interest in the way organizations handle the plurality and multitude of process standards they are faced with in a modern working environment. The process how organizations respond to environmental challenges like the increasing demand for process standards we call metastructuring. Based on the metastructuring approach by Orlikowski et al. (1995) it explores the process of internal standard-use mediation by an in-depth single case study. The case company develops step by step a dedicated institutional entity reacting to standard complexity and customer pressure. As a result, mediators shape extensively the standard use of the employees in the case company. They develop a process library which integrates different standards. This work sheds light on how this metastructuring process is accomplished, which areas of metastructuring regarding process standards can be found and explore different types of metastructuring activities by the involved standard-use mediators.

[1]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[2]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Scripts in Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[3]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Commentary: Separating Play and Critique , 1998 .

[4]  P. Adler.  The Evolving Object of Software Development , 2005 .

[5]  Josef Wieland,et al.  Corporate Governance, Values Management, and Standards: A European Perspective , 2005 .

[6]  Andrea Fried,et al.  DECOUPLING FROM STANDARDS — PROCESS MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL INNOVATION IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATIONS , 2013 .

[7]  Andrea Fried,et al.  Performance measurement systems and their relation to strategic learning: A case study in a software-developing organization , 2010 .

[8]  Monique Janneck,et al.  APPROPRIATION AND MEDIATION OF TECHNOLOGY USE IN STABLE SELF-ORGANISED ONLINE COMMUNITIES , 2006 .

[9]  Kurt Sandholtz,et al.  Making Standards Stick: A Theory of Coupled vs. Decoupled Compliance , 2012 .

[10]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[11]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Helping CSCW applications succeed: the role of mediators in the context of use , 1994, CSCW '94.

[12]  Hanne Westh Nicolajsen,et al.  Towards Variation Or Uniformity? Comparing Technology-use Mediations Of Web-based Groupware , 2002, ECIS.

[13]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[15]  Jonathan Jingsheng Shi,et al.  A synergetic model for implementing an integrated management system: an empirical study in China , 2007 .

[16]  Olivier Boiral,et al.  ISO 9000: Outside the Iron Cage , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[18]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  Exploring users' appropriation and post‐implementation managerial intervention in the context of industry IOIS , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  K. Weick.  Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[20]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[21]  Nils Brunsson,et al.  Organizations, Markets, and Standardization , 2002 .

[22]  Bengt Jacobsson,et al.  The Contemporary Expansion of Standardization , 2002 .

[23]  Kai Jakobs,et al.  Shaping user-side innovation through standardisation: The example of ICT , 2006 .

[24]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Lois Quam,et al.  The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification , 1998 .

[26]  Jorgen P. Bansler,et al.  Technology-use mediation: making sense of electronic communication in an organizational context , 2003, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Didar Zowghi,et al.  A Maturity Model for the Implementation of Software Process Improvement: an Empirical Study , 2022 .

[28]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[29]  R. Acorn,et al.  A WORLD OF STANDARDS , 2011 .

[30]  James D. Wright,et al.  A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization ∗ , 2013 .

[31]  T. Muhr.  ATLAS/ti — A prototype for the support of text interpretation , 1991 .

[32]  D. Seidl.  Standard Setting and Following in Corporate Governance: An Observation-Theoretical Study of the Effectiveness of Governance Codes , 2007 .

[33]  Kristina Tamm Hallström,et al.  Organizing International Standardization: Iso and the Iasc in Quest of Authority , 2004 .

[34]  J. Fleck.  Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology☆ , 1994 .

[35]  Günther Ortmann,et al.  On drifting rules and standards , 2010 .

[36]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction , 1999 .

[37]  Kristina Tamm Hallström,et al.  Organizing the Process of Standardization , 2002 .

[38]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[39]  Gerard O'Regan,et al.  Introduction to Software Process Improvement , 2010, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[40]  F. Kohlbacher.  The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case Study Research , 2006 .

[41]  Frederic Marimon i Viadiu,et al.  ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards: A projection model for the decline phase , 2009 .

[42]  Stephen G. MacDonell,et al.  Understanding technology use in global virtual teams: Research methodologies and methods , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[43]  P. Leonardi,et al.  What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing , 2010 .

[44]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .