Does Making Something Move Matter? Representations of Goals and Sources in Motion Events With Causal Sources

Previous studies have shown a robust bias to express the goal path over the source path when describing events ("the bird flew into the pitcher," rather than "… out of the bucket into the pitcher"). Motivated by linguistic theory, this study manipulated the causal structure of events (specifically, making the source cause the motion of the figure) and measured the extent to which adults and 3.5- to 4-year-old English-speaking children included the goal and source in their descriptions. We found that both children's and adults' encoding of the source increased for events in which the source caused the motion of the figure compared to nearly identical events in which the source played no such causal role. However, a goal bias persisted overall for both causal and noncausal motion events. These findings suggest that although the goal bias in language is highly robust, properties of the source (such as causal agency) influence its likelihood of being encoded in language, thus shedding light on how properties of an event can influence the mapping of event components into language.

[1]  P. Wolff.  Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events , 2003, Cognition.

[2]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Markedness and Subject Choice in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[3]  Caitlin M. Fausey,et al.  Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  David R. Dowty.  Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[5]  B. Levin.  Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[6]  E. Markman,et al.  When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth , 1994 .

[7]  Evguenia Markovskaya,et al.  Goal-Source Asymmetry and Russian Spatial Prefixes , 2007 .

[8]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Secret Agents , 2005, Psychological science.

[9]  Sandeep Prasada,et al.  Acquiring generic knowledge , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Hana Filip,et al.  Prefixes and the Delimitation of Events , 2003 .

[11]  Luna Filipović,et al.  Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity: Stephen C. Levinson, David Wilkins (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 621 pp., ISBN-10 0-521-67178-7 (paperback) , 2008 .

[12]  Terry Regier,et al.  The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism , 1996 .

[13]  P. Muentener,et al.  The intention-to-CAUSE bias: Evidence from children’s causal language , 2011, Cognition.

[14]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Motion events in language and cognition , 2002, Cognition.

[15]  Caitlin M. Fausey,et al.  Constructing Agency: The Role of Language , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[16]  J. M. E. Moravcsik,et al.  How Do Words Get Their Meanings , 1981 .

[17]  L. Schulz,et al.  Mind the Gap: Investigating Toddlers’ Sensitivity to Contact Relations in Predictive Events , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  L. Schulz,et al.  Toddlers infer unobserved causes for spontaneous events , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[19]  Ray Jackendoff.  Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[20]  P. Muentener.  The origin and development of causal reasoning , 2009 .

[21]  B. Landau,et al.  Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language , 2005, Cognition.

[22]  Cynthia L Fisher,et al.  Who's the Subject? Sentence Structure and Verb Meaning , 2010 .

[23]  Laura Lakusta,et al.  Using Language to Navigate the Infant Mind , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[24]  Seungho Nam.  Goal and Source: Their Syntactic and Semantic Asymmetry , 2004 .

[25]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[26]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  The Amelia Bedelia effect: World knowledge and the goal bias in language acquisition , 2013, Cognition.

[27]  E. Kako.  Thematic role properties of subjects and objects , 2006, Cognition.

[28]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Cross-linguistic evidence for a Goal/Source asymmetry: The case of Japanese , 2006 .

[29]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Language and Memory for Motion Events: Origins of the Asymmetry Between Source and Goal Paths , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Anna Papafragou,et al.  Source-Goal Asymmetries in Motion Representation: Implications for Language Production and Comprehension , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.