Underwater Acoustic Impulsive Noise Monitoring in Port Facilities: Case Study of the Port of Cartagena†

Recording underwater impulsive noise data is an important aspect of mitigating its environmental impact and improving maritime environmental management systems. This paper describes the method used and results of the spatial monitoring of both the baseline noise level and the impulsive noise sources in the Port of Cartagena. An autonomous vessel was equipped with a smart digital hydrophone with a working frequency range between 10 and 200 kHz and a received voltage response (RVR) of, approximately, −170 dB re 1V/µPa. A GIS map was drawn up with the spatiotemporal distribution of the basal sound pressure levels by coupling the acoustic data with the vessel’s GPS positions to identify the sources of the impulsive noise of interest and their temporal characteristics. The loading of cargo containers was identified as the main source of impulse noise. This study is the first of a series designed to obtain accurate information on underwater noise pollution and its potential impact on biodiversity in the Port of Cartagena.

[1]  Linda S. Weilgart,et al.  THE IMPACT OF OCEAN NOISE POLLUTION ON FISH AND INVERTEBRATES , 2018 .

[2]  Michele Scarpiniti,et al.  FIN WHALES AVOID LOUD RHYTHMIC LOW- FREQUENCY SOUNDS IN THE LIGURIAN SEA , 2008 .

[3]  Paul C. Etter,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Modeling and Simulation , 2018 .

[4]  Nathan D. Merchant,et al.  Underwater noise modelling for environmental impact assessment , 2016 .

[5]  A N Popper,et al.  The effects of anthropogenic sources of sound on fishes. , 2009, Journal of fish biology.

[6]  Thomas Götz,et al.  Acoustic deterrent devices to prevent pinniped depredation: efficiency, conservation concerns and possible solutions , 2013 .

[7]  Guangxu Liu,et al.  Noise in the Sea and Its Impacts on Marine Organisms , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[8]  J. Teilmann,et al.  Pile driving zone of responsiveness extends beyond 20 km for harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena (L.)). , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[10]  J. Mercer,et al.  Colossus Revisited: A Review and Extension of the Marsh-Schulkin Shallow Water Transmission Loss Model (1962) , 1985 .

[11]  Diego Alonso,et al.  An Autonomous Solar-Powered Marine Robotic Observatory for Permanent Monitoring of Large Areas of Shallow Water , 2018, Sensors.

[12]  Sarah J Dolman,et al.  Active sonar, beaked whales and European regional policy. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[13]  Werner Stefanie,et al.  Monitoring Guidance for Underwater Noise in European Seas- Part II: Monitoring Guidance Specifications , 2014 .

[14]  B. Howe,et al.  Ocean ambient sound: Comparing the 1960s with the 1990s for a receiver off the California coast , 2002 .

[15]  Christopher W. Clark,et al.  Impacts of anthropogenic noise on marine life : publication patterns, new discoveries, and future directions in research and management , 2015 .

[16]  C. Clark,et al.  Acoustic and behavioural changes by fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) in response to shipping and airgun noise , 2012 .

[17]  Geert Aarts,et al.  Harbour porpoise movement strategy affects cumulative number of animals acoustically exposed to underwater explosions , 2016 .

[18]  Chandra Salgado-Kent,et al.  Underwater noise sources in Fremantle inner harbour: dolphins, pile driving and traffic. , 2012 .

[19]  Iain Parnum,et al.  Measurement and Modelling of Underwater Noise from Pile Driving , 2010 .

[20]  R. McCauley,et al.  Impact of air gun noise on the behaviour of marine fish and squid. , 2012, Marine pollution bulletin.