The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing

Individual differences in drawing bridging inferences during text comprehension were examined. We measured reader differences in working memory capacity, using the reading span task, and in access to relevant knowledge, using Potts and Peterson’s (1985) integration task. The dependent measure of greatest concern was answer time about facts posited to validate the bridging inference. Reading span and access were negligibly correlated, an outcome that supports their independence. Answer times were lower both for high reading span and high-access readers. In addition, readers who were either high on both reader traits or low on both traits exhibited qualitatively different inference effects from the typical pattern. It is proposed that knowledge access during comprehension is facilitated by the extraction of integrated situation models from text and that it is individuals with efficient reading processes who can construct these models.

[1]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Fact retrieval and the paradox of interference , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Jason E. Albrecht,et al.  Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence , 1993 .

[3]  Murray Singer,et al.  The role of case‐filling inferences in the coherence of brief passages∗ , 1980 .

[4]  M. Singer,et al.  Validation of causal bridging inferences in discourse understanding. , 1992 .

[5]  M. Daneman,et al.  Working memory and reading skill re-examined. , 1987 .

[6]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Focused memory search in fact retrieval , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[7]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[8]  M. Singer,et al.  Inferring consequences in story comprehension , 1983 .

[9]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Reinstatement of causal information during reading. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A partial resolution of the paradox of interference: The role of integrating knowledge , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[13]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Murray Glanzer,et al.  Memory mechanisms in text comprehension , 1986 .

[15]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: An individual-differences approach. , 1993 .

[16]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming , 1988 .

[17]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  There are Generalized Abilities and One of Them is Reading , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[18]  John B. Black,et al.  Causal coherence and memory for events in narratives , 1981 .

[19]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Inferences during Reading: Converging Evidence from Discourse Analysis, Talk-Aloud Protocols, and Recognition Priming , 1993 .

[20]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Minimal or Global Inference during Reading , 1994 .

[21]  Murray Singer,et al.  Constructing and Validating Motive Bridging Inferences , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. , 1994 .

[23]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[24]  Jason E. Albrecht,et al.  Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[26]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Reading perspectives and memory for text : an individual differences analysis , 1991 .

[27]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[28]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Contextually relevant aspects of meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Murray Singer,et al.  Individual differences in bridging inference processes , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[31]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual Differences in Integrating Information between and within Sentences. , 1983 .

[32]  M. Just,et al.  Working Memory Constraints on the Resolution of Lexical Ambiguity: Maintaining Multiple Interpretations in Neutral Contexts , 1994 .

[33]  C. Fletcher,et al.  An on-line assessment of causal reasoning during comprehension , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Murray Singer.  Causal bridging inferences: Validating consistent and inconsistent sequences. , 1993 .

[35]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[36]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  Memory search without interference: The role of integration , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  J. Oakhill,et al.  Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[38]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Working‐memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension , 1991 .

[39]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Components of fluent reading , 1985 .

[40]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Language Comprehension , 1988 .

[41]  J. Keenan,et al.  The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory , 1984 .

[42]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Word Knowledge and Working Memory as Predictors of Reading Skill. , 1988 .

[43]  S. Duffy,et al.  Degree of causal relatedness and memory , 1987 .

[44]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[45]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Incorporation versus compartmentalization in memory for discourse , 1985 .

[46]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[47]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[48]  G. Radvansky,et al.  Mental models and the fan effect. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[50]  M. Masson,et al.  Working memory and individual differences in comprehension and memory of text. , 1983 .

[51]  Murray Singer,et al.  Bridging-Inferences and Enthymemes , 1990 .

[52]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[53]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .