Rapid, multiplexed microfluidic phage display.

The development of a method for high-throughput, automated proteomic screening could impact areas ranging from fundamental molecular interactions to the discovery of novel disease markers and therapeutic targets. Surface display techniques allow for efficient handling of large molecular libraries in small volumes. In particular, phage display has emerged as a powerful technology for selecting peptides and proteins with enhanced, target-specific binding affinities. Yet, the process becomes cumbersome and time-consuming when multiple targets are involved. Here we demonstrate for the first time a microfluidic chip capable of identifying high affinity phage-displayed peptides for multiple targets in just a single round and without the need for bacterial infection. The chip is shown to be able to yield well-established control consensus sequences while simultaneously identifying new sequences for clinically important targets. Indeed, the confined parameters of the device allow not only for highly controlled assay conditions but also introduce a significant time-reduction to the phage display process. We anticipate that this easily-fabricated, disposable device has the potential to impact areas ranging from fundamental studies of protein, peptide, and molecular interactions, to applications such as fully automated proteomic screening.

[1]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Constellations in a cellular universe , 2003, Nature.

[2]  Jonas Persson,et al.  Acoustic microfluidic chip technology to facilitate automation of phage display selection , 2008, The FEBS journal.

[3]  M. Jamal,et al.  Self-folding micropatterned polymeric containers , 2011, Biomedical microdevices.

[4]  P. Howarth,et al.  Interleukin-4, -5, and -6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in normal and asthmatic airways: evidence for the human mast cell as a source of these cytokines. , 1994, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[5]  Jessica Melin,et al.  Microfluidic large-scale integration: the evolution of design rules for biological automation. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[6]  H. Lehrach,et al.  High-throughput mammalian two-hybrid screening for protein-protein interactions using transfected cell arrays , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[7]  Mianqi Xue,et al.  Thermochemical Patterning of Polymer Thin Films With Tunable Size‐Reduction Effects Using Metal‐Coated Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Stamps , 2009 .

[8]  Justyn Jaworski,et al.  Selective and sensitive TNT sensors using biomimetic polydiacetylene-coated CNT-FETs. , 2011, ACS nano.

[9]  David Erickson,et al.  Electrokinetic microfluidic devices for rapid, low power drug delivery in autonomous microsystems. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[10]  William A. Goddard,et al.  Peptide-nanowire hybrid materials for selective sensing of small molecules. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  Mary F. Lopez,et al.  Better approaches to finding the needle in a haystack: Optimizing proteome analysis through automation , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[12]  H Tom Soh,et al.  Controlling the selection stringency of phage display using a microfluidic device. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[13]  Axel Scherer,et al.  Experimentally validated quantitative linear model for the device physics of elastomeric microfluidic valves. , 2007, Journal of applied physics.

[14]  Stephen R. Quake,et al.  A Microfabricated Rotary Pump , 2001 .

[15]  Uroš Urleb,et al.  Comparison of bacterial and phage display peptide libraries in search of target-binding motif , 2005, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[16]  S. Jacobson,et al.  Integrated system for rapid PCR-based DNA analysis in microfluidic devices. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  M. Ürgen,et al.  Physical elution in phage display selection of inorganic-binding peptides , 2009 .

[18]  R A Felder,et al.  Robotics and the changing face of the clinical laboratory. , 1996, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  Nancy Allbritton,et al.  Surface modification of poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices by ultraviolet polymer grafting. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  Siddharth V. Patwardhan,et al.  Interactions of biomolecules with inorganic materials: principles, applications and future prospects , 2007 .

[21]  L. Hood,et al.  Integrated barcode chips for rapid, multiplexed analysis of proteins in microliter quantities of blood , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Frédéric Reymond,et al.  Why the move to microfluidics for protein analysis? , 2004, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  Ok Chan Jeong,et al.  Fabrication of a peristaltic PDMS micropump , 2005 .

[24]  Min Jun Kim,et al.  Microfluidic pump powered by self-organizing bacteria. , 2008, Small.

[25]  Vincent Studer,et al.  A nanoliter-scale nucleic acid processor with parallel architecture , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Fabrication of bacteria and virus microarrays based on polymeric capillary force lithography. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[27]  R. Naik,et al.  Biomimetic synthesis and patterning of silver nanoparticles , 2002, Nature materials.

[28]  H. Matsui,et al.  Peptide‐Based Nanotubes and Their Applications in Bionanotechnology , 2005, Advanced materials.

[29]  C. J. Murray,et al.  Peptide Templates for Nanoparticle Synthesis Derived from Polymerase Chain Reaction‐Driven Phage Display , 2004 .

[30]  Daniel Auerbach,et al.  The post‐genomic era of interactive proteomics: Facts and perspectives , 2002, Proteomics.

[31]  Yu Huang,et al.  Specific peptide regulated synthesis of ultrasmall platinum nanocrystals. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  H. Haick,et al.  Detecting simulated patterns of lung cancer biomarkers by random network of single-walled carbon nanotubes coated with nonpolymeric organic materials. , 2008, Nano letters.

[33]  R. Mathies,et al.  Integrated microfluidic systems for high-performance genetic analysis. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[34]  J G Houston,et al.  The chemical-biological interface: developments in automated and miniaturised screening technology. , 1997, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[35]  Mary Qu Yang,et al.  Prediction-based approaches to characterize bidirectional promoters in the mammalian genome , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[36]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Screening of protein crystallization conditions on a microfluidic chip using nanoliter-size droplets. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[37]  Dmitry A Markov,et al.  Label-free molecular interaction determinations with nanoscale interferometry. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[38]  G. Whitesides The origins and the future of microfluidics , 2006, Nature.

[39]  Yue Cui,et al.  Chemical functionalization of graphene enabled by phage displayed peptides. , 2010, Nano letters.

[40]  A. Sanghvi,et al.  Biomaterials functionalization using a novel peptide that selectively binds to a conducting polymer , 2005, Nature materials.

[41]  Michael C. McAlpine,et al.  Recognition of patterned molecular ink with phage displayed peptides. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  Xiaolin Zheng,et al.  Numerical characterization and optimization of the microfluidics for nanowire biosensors. , 2008, Nano letters.

[43]  Marc R. Knecht,et al.  Elucidation of peptide effects that control the activity of nanoparticles. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[44]  Q. Jöbsis,et al.  Increased cytokines, chemokines and soluble adhesion molecules in exhaled breath condensate of asthmatic children , 2009, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[45]  R. Appel,et al.  Guidelines for the next 10 years of proteomics , 2009, Proteomics.

[46]  Mischa Zelzer,et al.  Next-generation peptide nanomaterials: molecular networks, interfaces and supramolecular functionality. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.