Identifying Soil Patterns at Different Spatial Scales with a Multi‐Receiver EMI Sensor

Multi-receiver electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors are increasingly being used to map soil spatial variability by measuring the apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) of multiple soil volumes. We present a procedure to process such measurements to identify both large-scale soil variability patterns and small-scale features such as archaeological traces. A 2.6-ha arable field in Belgium was selected since aerial surveys indicated the presence of fine archaeological traces being masked partly by what appeared to be a trend in the soil composition. A survey with a DUALEM-21S EMI sensor provided four co-located ECa measurements of varying soil volumes, which were combined in a two-step inversion procedure. Our procedure enhanced the distinction between the archaeological traces and probable ice-wedge casts, with a small lateral and vertical extent, and the large-scale trend of natural soil variability, identified as the varying depth to the interface between two contrasting soil layers.

[1]  Timothy R. Green,et al.  Effect of Soil Water on Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity and Texture Relationships in a Dryland Field , 2006 .

[2]  J. D. Mcneill.  Electromagnetic Terrain Conduc-tivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers , 1980 .

[3]  T. Uram,et al.  Tikhonov regularization of electrical conductivity depth profiles in field soils , 1997 .

[4]  S. Jones,et al.  Imaging of Hill-Slope Soil Moisture Wetting Patterns in a Semi-Arid Oak Savanna Catchment Using Time-Lapse Electromagnetic Induction , 2012 .

[5]  James R. Wait,et al.  A NOTE ON THE ELECTROMAGNETIC RESPONSE OF A STRATIFIED EARTH , 1962 .

[6]  Andreas G. Lazari,et al.  Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[7]  Margaret A. Oliver,et al.  Exploring the spatial relations between soil physical properties and apparent electrical conductivity , 2005 .

[8]  Inside a mound : Applied geophysics in archaeological prospecting at the Kings' Mounds, Gamla Uppsala, Sweden , 2004 .

[9]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Estimating depths to claypans using electromagnetic induction methods , 1994 .

[10]  Glen R. Walker,et al.  Depth profiles of electrical conductivity from linear combinations of electromagnetic induction measurements , 1992 .

[11]  Electromagnetic survey of a Celtic tumulus , 1996 .

[12]  David Beamish,et al.  Low induction number, ground conductivity meters: A correction procedure in the absence of magnetic effects , 2011 .

[13]  Philippe De Smedt,et al.  Imaging a Polygonal Network of Ice‐Wedge Casts with an Electromagnetic Induction Sensor , 2011 .

[14]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Inversion of Soil Conductivity Profiles from Electromagnetic Induction Measurements , 2002 .

[15]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  Determining Soil Electrical Conductivity-Depth Relations Using an Inductive Electromagnetic Soil Conductivity Meter1 , 1981 .

[16]  L. Cockx,et al.  A pedotransfer function to evaluate the soil profile textural heterogeneity using proximally sensed apparent electrical conductivity , 2009 .

[17]  R. W. Groom,et al.  Vertical Spatial Sensitivity and Exploration Depth of Low‐Induction‐Number Electromagnetic‐Induction Instruments , 2007 .

[18]  F. A. Monteiro Santos,et al.  Inversion of Multiconfiguration Electromagnetic (DUALEM‐421) Profiling Data Using a One‐Dimensional Laterally Constrained Algorithm , 2010 .

[19]  J. Porsani,et al.  Reduction of topography effect in inductive electromagnetic profiles: application on coastal sambaqui (shell mound) archaeological site in Santa Catarina state, Brazil , 2009 .

[20]  L. Cockx,et al.  Comparing the EM38DD and DUALEM‐21S Sensors for Depth‐to‐Clay Mapping , 2009 .

[21]  Dennis L. Corwin,et al.  An Improved Technique for Determining Soil Electrical Conductivity-Depth Relations from Above-ground Electromagnetic Measurements1 , 1982 .

[22]  T. Saey,et al.  Electrical Conductivity Depth Modelling with a Multireceiver EMI Sensor for Prospecting Archaeological Features , 2012 .

[23]  Peter G Slavich,et al.  Determining ECa-depth profiles from electromagnetic induction measurements. , 1990 .

[24]  L. Cockx,et al.  Upgrading a 1/20,000 soil map with an apparent electrical conductivity survey , 2008 .

[25]  Eric C. Brevik,et al.  Evaluation of Electromagnetic Induction to Characterize and Map Sodium‐Affected Soils in the Northern Great Plains , 2011 .

[26]  D. Marquardt.  An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[27]  Mohammad M. Islam,et al.  Using a multi-receiver survey of apparent electrical conductivity to reconstruct a Holocene tidal channel in a polder area , 2012 .

[28]  Marcie L. Venter,et al.  Integrating shallow geophysical survey: archaeological investigations at Totógal in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, México , 2006 .

[29]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  Global Prospects Rooted in Soil Science , 2011 .

[30]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Assessment of multi-frequency electromagnetic induction for determining soil moisture patterns at the hillslope scale. , 2009 .

[31]  M. Meirvenne,et al.  Reconstructing the paleotopography beneath the loess cover with the aid of an electromagnetic induction sensor , 2008 .

[32]  Robert S. Freeland,et al.  Soil Investigations using Electromagnetic Induction and Ground-Penetrating Radar in Southwest Tennessee , 2002 .

[33]  W. J. Alves,et al.  New Calibrations for Determining Soil Electrical Conductivity—Depth Relations from Electromagnetic Measurements , 1989 .

[34]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[35]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Quantitative Two‐Layer Conductivity Inversion of Multi‐Configuration Electromagnetic Induction Measurements , 2011 .