Reducing the effects of metal artefact using high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT (DECT) in hip replacements

PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine whether high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) could be used to overcome the effects of beam hardening artefact that arise from preferential deflection of low energy photons.Materials and MethodsTwo phantoms were used: a Charnley total hip replacement set in gelatine and a Catphan 500. DECT datasets were acquired at 100, 200 and 400 mA (Siemens Definition Flash, 100 and 140 kVp) and reconstructed using a standard combined algorithm (1:1) and then as monoenergetic reconstructions at 10 keV intervals from 40 to 190 keV. Semi-automated segmentation with threshold inpainting was used to obtain the attenuation values and standard deviation (SD) of the streak artefact. High contrast line pair resolution and background noise were assessed using the Catphan 500.ResultsStreak artefact is progressively reduced with increasing keV monoenergetic reconstructions. Reconstruction of a 400 mA acquisition at 150 keV results in reduction in the volume of streak artefact from 65 cm3 to 17 cm3 (74 %). There was a decrease in the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) at higher tube voltages, with the peak CNR seen at 70–80 keV. High contrast spatial resolution was maintained at high keV values.ConclusionMonoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT at increasing theoretical kilovoltages reduces the streak artefact produced by beam hardening from orthopaedic prostheses, accompanied by a modest increase in heterogeneity of background image attenuation, and decrease in contrast to noise ratio, but no deterioration in high contrast line pair resolution.

[1]  R L Morin,et al.  A practical method to measure the MTF of CT scanners. , 1982, Medical physics.

[2]  E. Fishman,et al.  Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction. , 1986, Radiology.

[3]  W. Kalender,et al.  Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. , 1987 .

[4]  E. Fishman,et al.  Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. , 1988, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  R. F. Farr,et al.  Physics for medical imaging , 1997 .

[6]  M W Vannier,et al.  Fast iterative algorithm for metal artifact reduction in X-ray CT. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[7]  K Engelke,et al.  CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique. , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  K. Kopecky,et al.  Musculoskeletal imaging with multislice CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Detection of low-contrast objects: experimental comparison of single- and multi-detector row CT with a phantom. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  G Allan Johnson,et al.  Optimization of eight-element multi-detector row helical CT technology for evaluation of the abdomen. , 2003, Radiology.

[11]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  Baudouin Maldague,et al.  Multi-detector CT imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient with metal hardware. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Yong-Min Huh,et al.  Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  Penelope Allisy-Roberts,et al.  Comprar Farr's Physics for Medical Imaging | Penelope J. Allisy-Roberts | 9780702028441 | Saunders , 2007 .

[16]  Ja-Young Choi,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction by the Alteration of Technical Factors in Multidetector Computed Tomography: A 3-Dimensional Quantitative Assessment , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  M. Macari,et al.  Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen , 2008, European Radiology.

[18]  C. H. McCollough,et al.  Dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique for characterization of renal masses as cyst or solid: a phantom feasibility study , 2009, European Radiology.

[19]  L. Fayad,et al.  Value of 3D CT in defining skeletal complications of orthopedic hardware in the postoperative patient. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  A. Zerbi,et al.  Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[21]  M. Rengo,et al.  Dual energy CT (DECT) of the liver: conventional versus virtual unenhanced images , 2010, European Radiology.

[22]  A. Perrella,et al.  Influence of dental metallic artifact from multislice CT in the assessment of simulated mandibular lesions , 2010, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[23]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation , 2011, European Radiology.