Future Directions in Supported Decision-Making

Supported decision-making is at the forefront of modern disability research. This is due to Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), which creates a state obligation to provide support for the exercise of legal capacity. This turned the practice of supported decision-making into a human rights imperative. Government and funding agencies are increasingly focusing their attention on the area. Researchers are similarly increasing their interest in the field. The impending danger is that the rush of interest in the area will overshadow the original intention of supported decision-making: to ensure that people with cognitive disability are provided with the freedom and the tools to participate as equal citizens and for every individual to be free to direct their own life. This article explores the theoretical foundations of supported decision-making and the evolution of supported decision-making research. It explains the research that is emerging in leading jurisdictions, the United States and Australia, and its potential to transform disability services and laws related to decision-making. Finally, it identifies areas of concern in the direction of such research and provides recommendations for ensuring that supported decision-making remains protective of the rights, will and preferences of people with cognitive disability.

[1]  Jonah Lehrer,et al.  How We Decide , 2009 .

[2]  M. Bach,et al.  A New Paradigm for Protecting Autonomy and the Right to Legal Capacity , 2014 .

[3]  T. Carney.  Guardianship, Citizenship, & Theorizing Substitute-decisionmaking Law , 2012 .

[4]  Lucy Series.  Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support paradigms. , 2015, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[5]  A. Damasio.  Self comes to mind : constructing the conscious brain , 2010 .

[6]  Lisa H. Schwartzman,et al.  Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self , 2002 .

[7]  Rosemary Kayess,et al.  Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2008 .

[8]  Mojan E Safavi.  My story. , 2012, Texas dental journal.

[9]  J. Hogg,et al.  Consistency, context and confidence in judgements of affective communication in adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. , 2001, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[10]  D. Southgate.  Definitions and Terminology of Dietary Fiber , 1982 .

[11]  C. Bigby,et al.  Supporting people with cognitive disabilities in decision making – processes and dilemmas , 2015 .

[12]  Eilionóir Flynn,et al.  The Support Model of Legal Capacity: Fact, Fiction, or Fantasy? , 2014 .

[13]  T. Shakespeare,et al.  Defending the Social Model , 1997 .

[14]  T. R. Moore.  Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects , 1974 .

[15]  Joanne M Watson.  Assumptions of Decision-Making Capacity: The Role Supporter Attitudes Play in the Realisation of Article 12 for People with Severe or Profound Intellectual Disability , 2016 .

[16]  A. Turnbull,et al.  The Perspectives of Individuals with Cognitive Disabilities and/or Autism on Their Lives and Their Problem Behavior , 2002 .

[17]  D. Kruse,et al.  People with Disabilities: Sidelined or Mainstreamed? , 2013 .

[18]  J. Lord,et al.  Lessons from the Experience of U.N. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Addressing the Democratic Deficit in Global Health Governance , 2010, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[19]  Jonathan G. Martinis,et al.  Unjustified Isolation Is Discrimination: The Olmstead Case Against Overbroad and Undue Organizational and Public Guardianship , 2015 .

[20]  T. Campanella.  Supported Decision-Making in Practice , 2015 .

[21]  C. Bigby,et al.  Supported Decision Making: Understanding How its Conceptual Link to Legal Capacity is Influencing the Development of Practice , 2014 .

[22]  R. Fish,et al.  `Cutting Doesn't Make You Die' , 2002 .

[23]  Oliver Lewis,et al.  United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities , 2007, International Legal Materials.

[24]  C. Antaki,et al.  Offering choices to people with intellectual disabilities: an interactional study. , 2008, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[25]  J. Newman,et al.  The Antagonisms of Choice: New Labour and the reform of public services , 2008, Social Policy and Society.

[26]  P. Gooding.  Navigating the ‘Flashing Amber Lights’ of the Right to Legal Capacity in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Responding to Major Concerns , 2015 .

[27]  Joanne Watson,et al.  The right to supported decision-making for people rarely heard , 2016 .

[28]  C. Laragy,et al.  Analysing Choice in Australian Individual Funding Disability Policies , 2014 .

[29]  M. Oliver,et al.  The social model of disability: thirty years on , 2013 .

[30]  R. Hastings,et al.  "I'm not a patient, I'm a person": The Experiences of Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities and Challenging Behavior-A Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies , 2013 .

[31]  Bernadette McSherry,et al.  The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. , 2008, Journal of law and medicine.

[32]  P. Blanck.  Disability Civil Rights Law and Policy , 2004 .

[33]  Eilionóir Flynn,et al.  Legislating personhood: realising the right to support in exercising legal capacity , 2014, International Journal of Law in Context.

[34]  P. Weller.  Supported Decision-making and the Achievement of Non-discrimination: The Promise and Paradox of the Disabilities Convention , 2008 .

[35]  Paul Harpur.  Embracing the new disability rights paradigm: the importance of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2012 .

[36]  Patricia H. Werhane,et al.  Persons, rights, and corporations , 1985 .

[37]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  A Framework for Research and Intervention Design in Supported Decision-Making , 2015 .

[38]  W. Boyce.  A Seat at the Table: Persons with Disabilities and Policy Making , 2001 .

[39]  R. Gordon.  The emergence of assisted (supported) decision-making in the Canadian law of adult guardianship and substitute decision-making. , 2000, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[40]  Anna Arstein-Kerslake.  An empowering dependency: exploring support for the exercise of legal capacity , 2016 .

[41]  L. Salzman.  Rethinking Guardianship (Again): Substituted Decision Making as a Violation of the Integration Mandate of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act , 2009 .

[42]  P. Blanck.  eQuality: The Struggle for Web Accessibility by Persons with Cognitive Disabilities , 2014 .

[43]  Nina A. Kohn,et al.  Supported Decision-Making: A Viable Alternative to Guardianship? , 2013 .

[44]  C. Antaki,et al.  Promoting choice and control in residential services for people with learning disabilities , 2008 .

[45]  Jonathan G. Martinis,et al.  “The Right to Make Choices”: The National Resource Center for Supported Decision‐Making , 2015 .

[46]  V. Finkelstein,et al.  The 'Social Model of Disability' and the Disability Movement , 2007 .

[47]  J. Porter,et al.  See What I Mean: Interpreting the Meaning of Communication by People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disabilities , 1999 .

[48]  Manfred Rehbinder.  Status, Contract, and the Welfare State , 1971 .

[49]  P. Gooding.  Supported Decision-Making: A Rights-Based Disability Concept and its Implications for Mental Health Law , 2013 .