Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆

Abstract Two process tracing techniques, explicit information search and verbal protocols, were used to examine the information processing strategies subjects use in reaching a decision. Subjects indicated preferences among apartments. The number of alternatives available and number of dimensions of information available was varied across sets of apartments. When faced with a two alternative situation, the subjects employed search strategies consistent with a compensatory decision process. In contrast, when faced with a more complex (multialternative) decision task, the subjects employed decision strategies designed to eliminate some of the available alternatives as quickly as possible and on the basis of a limited amount of information search and evaluation. The results demonstrate that the information processing leading to choice will vary as a function of task complexity. An integration of research in decision behavior with the methodology and theory of more established areas of cognitive psychology, such as human problem solving, is advocated.

[1]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[2]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Decision time as a function of the number and complexity of equally attractive alternatives. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  R. Dawes.  SOCIAL SELECTION BASED ON MULTIDIMENSIONAL CRITERIA. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Cognition: An Introduction , 1973 .

[5]  F. Restle.  Psychology of judgment and choice , 1961 .

[6]  Michael E. Doherty,et al.  The influence of task characteristics on strategies of cue combination , 1974 .

[7]  John W. Payne,et al.  Alternative approaches to decision making under risk: Moments versus risk dimensions. , 1973 .

[8]  H. J. Einhorn.  The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[10]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas , 1973 .

[11]  H. J. Einhorn.  Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information , 1971 .

[12]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[13]  A. A. J. Marley,et al.  Random utility models with equality: An apparent, but not actual, generalization of random utility models , 1974 .

[14]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[15]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[16]  John R Hayes.  HUMAN DATA PROCESSING LIMITS IN DECISION MAKING , 1962 .

[17]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[18]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[19]  P. Suppes,et al.  Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology , 1976 .

[20]  N. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive algebra of the equation: Gift size = generosity = income , 1974 .

[21]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load , 1974 .

[22]  John W. Payne,et al.  Relation of perceived risk to preferences among gambles. , 1975 .

[23]  Peter Wright.  Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying Vs. Optimizing , 1975 .

[24]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Dimensional Commensurability and Cue Utilization in Comparative Judgment. , 1974 .

[25]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[26]  M L Braunstein,et al.  An Information-Processing Model of the Aircraft Accident Investigator , 1967, Human factors.

[27]  C. Coombs.  A theory of data. , 1965, Psychology Review.