Synchronic variation in the articulation and the acoustics of the Polish three-way place distinction in sibilants and its implications for diachronic change

The aim of the present study was to relate articulatory properties of the Polish sibilants /s ʂ ɕ/ to a potential neutralization of /ʂ/ as either /s/ or /ɕ/, the former having occurred in a number of Polish dialects. For this purpose tongue tip (TT) movement data was obtained together with acoustic data using electromagnetic articulography. The sibilants, that were always followed by either /a e o/, were produced by four L1-Polish speakers at fast and slow speech rates. While /s ʂ/ had almost identical transitions, they differed greatly in the spectral characteristics with /ʂ/ being closer to /ɕ/. In order to capture differences in tongue position as well as shape both TT position and TT orientation data were analyzed. The vertical TT orientation showed similarities in /ʂ/ and /s/ production, but the two sibilants were clearly separated in TT position, with /ʂ/ being produced far more back than /s/ and /ɕ/, and the latter two being very similar. The tendentially greater effect of speech rate on /ʂ/ together with the varying acoustic and articulatory similarities between the sibilants are taken as an indicator for greater instability of /ʂ/. This synchronic instability is discussed in terms of potential diachronic mergers.

[1]  Marzena Zygis,et al.  A perceptual study of Polish fricatives, and its implications for historical sound change , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[2]  D. Whalen,et al.  Perception of the English /s/–/∫/ distinction relies on fricative noises and transitions, not on brief spectral slices , 1991 .

[3]  B. Lobanov.  Classification of Russian Vowels Spoken by Different Speakers , 1971 .

[4]  J. Harrington,et al.  The Relationship between the Perception and Production of Coarticulation during a Sound Change in Progress , 2012, Language and speech.

[5]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  The Evolution of Sibilants in Polish and Russian , 2003 .

[6]  M Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Vowels and Consonants , 2000, Manchu Grammar.

[8]  J. Harrington,et al.  Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: an acoustic and perceptual study. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Pawel M. Nowak.  The role of vowel transitions and frication noise in the perception of Polish sibilants , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[10]  Philip Hoole,et al.  Beyond 2D in articulatory data acquisition and analysis , 2003 .

[11]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  The effect of emphatic stress on consonant vowel coarticulation. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M. Beckman,et al.  The Interplay Between Prosodic Structure and Coarticulation , 1993, Language and speech.

[13]  M. Beckman,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics , 1992 .

[14]  Shinji Maeda,et al.  Formant-cavity affiliation in sibilant fricatives , 2010 .

[15]  San Duanmu,et al.  The Phonology of Standard Chinese , 2001 .

[16]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  The Effect of Speaking Rate onConsonant Vowel Coarticulation , 2009, Phonetica.

[17]  Silke Hamann,et al.  Perceptual and acoustic cues of Polish coronal fricatives , 2003 .

[18]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Phonetic Analysis of Speech Corpora , 2010 .

[19]  Lasse Bombien.  Segmental and prosodic aspects in the production of consonant clusters , 2011 .

[20]  Florian Schiel,et al.  MAUS Goes Iterative , 2004, LREC.