Improving delivery room and admission efficiency and outcomes for infants < 32 weeks: ELGAN+ (Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonate).

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the implementation of a systematic approach to improve the resuscitation, stabilization, and admission of infants <  32 weeks gestation and also to ascertain its effect on organization, efficiency, and clinical outcomes during hospitalization. METHODS Retrospective study involving a multidisciplinary team with checklists, role assignment, equipment organization, step by step protocol, and real time documentation for the care of infants <  32 weeks gestation in the delivery room to the neonatal intensive care unit. Pre-data collection (cases) period was from Aug, 2015 to July, 2017, and post-data collection(controls) period was from Aug, 2017 to Aug, 2019. RESULTS 337 infants were included (179 cases; 158 controls). Increase surfactant use in the resuscitation room (41% vs. 27%, p = 0.007) and reduction in median time to administer surfactant (34 minutes (range, 6-120) vs. 74 minutes (range, 7-120), p = 0.001) observed in control-group. There was a significant reduction in incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (27% vs. 39%), intraventricular hemorrhage (11% vs. 17%), severe retinopathy of prematurity (3% vs. 9%), and necrotizing enterocolitis (4% vs. 6%), however these results were not statistically significant after controlling for severity of illness. CONCLUSIONS A systematic approach to the care of infants <  32 weeks gestation significantly improved mortality rates and reduced rates of comorbidities.

[1]  A. Jalali,et al.  Preterm birth lifetime costs in the United States in 2016: An update. , 2021, Seminars in perinatology.

[2]  S. Thoyre,et al.  The Golden Hour: a quality improvement initiative for extremely premature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit , 2019, Journal of Perinatology.

[3]  Chavis A. Patterson,et al.  NICU infant health severity and family outcomes: a systematic review of assessments and findings in psychosocial research , 2018, Journal of Perinatology.

[4]  Robin B. Dail,et al.  First Golden Hour of Life: A Quality Improvement Initiative , 2016, Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses.

[5]  T. Ashmeade,et al.  Outcomes of a Neonatal Golden Hour Implementation Project , 2016, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[6]  D. Kaufman,et al.  NASCAR pit-stop model improves delivery room and admission efficiency and outcomes for infants <27 weeks' gestation. , 2015, Resuscitation.

[7]  H. Glass,et al.  Outcomes for Extremely Premature Infants , 2015, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  S. Rinehart,et al.  The Golden Hour: Improving the Stabilization of the Very Low Birth-Weight Infant , 2014, Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses.

[9]  M. Wyckoff Initial resuscitation and stabilization of the periviable neonate: the Golden-Hour approach. , 2014, Seminars in perinatology.

[10]  W. Bradshaw,et al.  Sixty Golden Minutes , 2012, Neonatal Network.

[11]  A. Abbott,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation of “Golden Hour” Practices in Infants Younger Than 33 Weeks' Gestation , 2012 .

[12]  G. Badger,et al.  Mortality and Neonatal Morbidity Among Infants 501 to 1500 Grams From 2000 to 2009 , 2012, Pediatrics.

[13]  J. McGrath Is evidence-based practice routine in the golden hour? , 2012, The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing.

[14]  D. Annibale,et al.  The golden hour. , 2010, Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses.

[15]  Jobeth W Pilcher,et al.  The Golden Hour: Care of the LBW Infant During the First Hour of Life One Unit’s Experience , 2009, Neonatal Network.

[16]  M. Vento,et al.  The First Golden Minutes of the Extremely-Low-Gestational-Age Neonate: A Gentle Approach , 2008, Neonatology.