Empirical Evidence for Correct Iris Match Score Degradation with Increased Time-Lapse between Gallery and Probe Matches

We explore the effects of time lapse on iris biometrics using a data set of images with four years time lapse between the earliest and most recent images of an iris (13 subjects, 26 irises, 1809 total images). We find that the average fractional Hamming distance for a match between two images of an iris taken four years apart is statistically significantly larger than the match for images with only a few months time lapse between them. A possible implication of our results is that iris biometric enrollment templates may undergo aging and that iris biometric enrollment may not be "once for life." To our knowledge, this is the first and only experimental study of iris match scores under long (multi-year) time lapse.

[1]  John Daugman,et al.  How iris recognition works , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[2]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Experiments with an improved iris segmentation algorithm , 2005, Fourth IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies (AutoID'05).

[3]  Natalia A. Schmid,et al.  Image quality assessment for iris biometric , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  John Daugman,et al.  New Methods in Iris Recognition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[5]  Dexin Zhang,et al.  DCT-Based Iris Recognition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Deformed Pattern Matching of Iris Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Kevin W. Bowyer,et al.  Optimizations in iris recognition , 2007 .

[8]  F. Alonso-Fernandez,et al.  On the Effects of Time Variability in Iris Recognition , 2008, 2008 IEEE Second International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems.

[9]  K.W. Bowyer,et al.  Detection of Iris Texture Distortions By Analyzing Iris Code Matching Results , 2008, 2008 IEEE Second International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems.

[10]  K.W. Bowyer,et al.  The Iris Challenge Evaluation 2005 , 2008, 2008 IEEE Second International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems.

[11]  Hiroshi Nakajima,et al.  An Effective Approach for Iris Recognition Using Phase-Based Image Matching , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Image understanding for iris biometrics: A survey , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[13]  K.W. Bowyer,et al.  The Best Bits in an Iris Code , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Pupil dilation degrades iris biometric performance , 2009, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..