Effects of stochasticity and division of labor in toxin production on two-strain bacterial competition in Escherichia coli

In phenotypically heterogeneous microbial populations, the decision to adopt one or another phenotype is often stochastically regulated. However, how this stochasticity affects interactions between competing microbes in mixed communities is difficult to assess. One example of such an interaction system is the competition of an Escherichia coli strain C, which performs division of labor between reproducers and self-sacrificing toxin producers, with a toxin-sensitive strain S. The decision between reproduction or toxin production within a single C cell is inherently stochastic. Here, combining experimental and theoretical approaches, we demonstrate that this stochasticity in the initial phase of colony formation is the crucial determinant for the competition outcome. In the initial phase (t < 12h), stochasticity influences the formation of viable C clusters at the colony edge. In the subsequent phase, the effective fitness differences (set primarily by the degree of division of labor in the C strain population) dictate the deterministic population dynamics and consequently competition outcome. In particular, we observe that competitive success of the C strain is only found if (i) a C edge cluster has formed at the end of the initial competition phase and (ii) the beneficial and detrimental effects of toxin production are balanced, which is the case at intermediate toxin producer fractions. Our findings highlight the importance of stochastic processes during the initial phase of colony formation, which might be highly relevant for other microbial community interactions in which the random choice between phenotypes can have long-lasting consequences for community fate.

[1]  M. Riley,et al.  Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application. , 2002, Annual review of microbiology.

[2]  Orkun S. Soyer,et al.  Challenges in microbial ecology: building predictive understanding of community function and dynamics , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[3]  Levin,et al.  Allelopathy in Spatially Distributed Populations , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  R. Kishony,et al.  A competitive trade-off limits the selective advantage of increased antibiotic production , 2016, Nature Microbiology.

[5]  Erwin Frey,et al.  High Variation of Fluorescence Protein Maturation Times in Closely Related Escherichia coli Strains , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  A. Pugsley,et al.  Colicin E2 release: lysis, leakage or secretion? Possible role of a phospholipase. , 1984, The EMBO journal.

[7]  Jacques Monod,et al.  The genetic control and cytoplasmic expression of “Inducibility” in the synthesis of β-galactosidase by E. coli , 1959 .

[8]  Richard N. Ellson,et al.  Transfer of low nanoliter volumes between microplates using focused acoustics-automation considerations , 2003 .

[9]  Madeleine Opitz,et al.  Chemical warfare and survival strategies in bacterial range expansions , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Amount of Colicin Release in Escherichia coli Is Regulated by Lysis Gene Expression of the Colicin E2 Operon , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  L. Chao,et al.  Structured habitats and the evolution of anticompetitor toxins in bacteria. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Kevin R. Foster,et al.  The evolution of cooperation within the gut microbiota , 2016, Nature.

[13]  Wolf-Dietrich Hardt,et al.  Self-destructive cooperation mediated by phenotypic noise , 2008, Nature.

[14]  A. Griffin,et al.  Social evolution theory for microorganisms , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[15]  O. Gillor,et al.  Auto-regulation of DNA degrading bacteriocins: molecular and ecological aspects , 2014, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[16]  D. Žgur-Bertok,et al.  Genes regulated by the Escherichia coli SOS repressor LexA exhibit heterogenous expression , 2010, BMC Microbiology.

[17]  Colin Kleanthous,et al.  Colicin Biology , 2007, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[18]  Ferdi L. Hellweger,et al.  Advancing microbial sciences by individual-based modelling , 2016, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[19]  T. Reichenbach,et al.  Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock–paper–scissors games , 2007, Nature.

[20]  Margaret A. Riley,et al.  Antibiotic-mediated antagonism leads to a bacterial game of rock–paper–scissors in vivo , 2004, Nature.

[21]  M. Riley,et al.  The role of SOS boxes in enteric bacteriocin regulation. , 2008, Microbiology.

[22]  H. Margalit,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of the SOS Response in Escherichia coli , 2009, PloS one.

[23]  S. Frank Spatial polymorphism of bacteriocins and other allelopathic traits , 1994, Evolutionary Ecology.

[24]  Travis E. Gibson,et al.  Universality of Human Microbial Dynamics , 2016, Nature.

[25]  Katherine H. Huang,et al.  Structure, Function and Diversity of the Healthy Human Microbiome , 2012, Nature.

[26]  J. Gore,et al.  Stochastic assembly produces heterogeneous communities in the Caenorhabditis elegans intestine , 2017, PLoS biology.

[27]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Genetic drift opposes mutualism during spatial population expansion , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  M. Feldgarden,et al.  THE PHENOTYPIC AND FITNESS EFFECTS OF COLICIN RESISTANCE IN ESCHERICHIA COLI K‐12 , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  M. Feldman,et al.  Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors , 2002, Nature.

[30]  P. Cotter,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Bacteriocin production augments niche competition by enterococci in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract. , 2015 .

[31]  C. Fuqua,et al.  Quorum sensing and motility mediate interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in biofilm cocultures. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  H. Ozeki,et al.  Production of Colicine by Single Bacteria , 1959, Nature.

[33]  E. A. Tonna,et al.  Changes in the Osteoblastic and Mitochondrial Population of Aging Periosteum , 1959, Nature.

[34]  Oskar Hallatschek,et al.  LIFE AT THE FRONT OF AN EXPANDING POPULATION , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  Katherine H. Huang,et al.  A framework for human microbiome research , 2012, Nature.

[36]  Paul B. Rainey,et al.  Evolution of species interactions in a biofilm community , 2007, Nature.

[37]  Nicola Zamboni,et al.  Gut Microbiota Orchestrates Energy Homeostasis during Cold , 2015, Cell.

[38]  Eric D. Kelsic,et al.  Counteraction of antibiotic production and degradation stabilizes microbial communities , 2015, Nature.

[39]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms , 2015, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[40]  Otto X. Cordero,et al.  Ecological Populations of Bacteria Act as Socially Cohesive Units of Antibiotic Production and Resistance , 2012, Science.

[41]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Allelopathy of bacteria in a lattice population: Competition between colicin-sensitive and colicin-producing strains , 1998, Evolutionary Ecology.

[42]  C. Fuqua,et al.  Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[43]  H. Bungay,et al.  Growth of yeast colonies on solid media. , 1988, Journal of general microbiology.

[44]  F. Weissing,et al.  Density of founder cells affects spatial pattern formation and cooperation in Bacillus subtilis biofilms , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[45]  D. Nelson,et al.  Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  K. Foster,et al.  Biofilm Formation As a Response to Ecological Competition , 2015, PLoS biology.