Forward osmosis desalination of brackish groundwater: Meeting water quality requirements for fertigation by integrating nanofiltration

The concept of fertiliser drawn forward osmosis (FDFO) desalination lies in the premise that fertilisers that serve as draw solutions (DS) add value to the FDFO product water for fertigation. However, because FDFO desalination is concentration based, the process cannot continue beyond the concentration equilibrium, one of the major limitations of the forward osmosis (FO) process. This results in final FDFO product water that, unless subjected to substantial dilution with fresh water, exceeds the acceptable nutrient concentrations for direct fertigation. In this study, nanofiltration (NF) has been assessed as an integrated process to FDFO desalination, either as a pre-treatment or post-treatment, to reduce the nutrient concentrations in the final product water and thereby allow direct use of the product water for fertigation without further dilution. NF as pre-treatment or post-treatment was found effective in reducing the nutrient concentrations using brackish groundwater (BGW) sources with relatively low total dissolved solid (TDS). However, when using higher TDS BGW sources, the product water still required further dilution or post-treatment before fertigation. NF as post-treatment was found to be more advantageous both in terms of reduced nutrient concentrations in the final product water and energy consumption.

[1]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. , 2000, Science.

[2]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Arsenic removal by RO and NF membranes , 1997 .

[3]  M. Elimelech,et al.  The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment , 2011, Science.

[4]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Blended fertilizers as draw solutions for fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis desalination. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Xue Li,et al.  Emerging forward osmosis (FO) technologies and challenges ahead for clean water and clean energy applications , 2012 .

[6]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Fertiliser drawn forward osmosis desalination: the concept, performance and limitations for fertigation , 2012, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology.

[7]  R. H. Forester,et al.  Nanofiltration membranes broaden the use of membrane separation technology , 1988 .

[8]  Ata M. Hassan,et al.  A new approach to membrane and thermal seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration membranes (Part 1) , 1998 .

[9]  Jack Gilron,et al.  Seawater desalination for agriculture by integrated forward and reverse osmosis: Improved product water quality for potentially less energy , 2012 .

[10]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[11]  Raphael Semiat,et al.  Energy issues in desalination processes. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes , 2012 .

[13]  Andreas Phocaides,et al.  Handbook on pressurized irrigation techniques , 2001 .

[14]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Nanofiltration: Principles and Applications , 2004 .

[15]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating Nanofiltration Membrane Performance to Membrane Charge (Electrokinetic) Characteristics , 2000 .

[16]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Nanofiltration of highly concentrated salt solutions up to seawater salinity , 2005 .

[17]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Role of Charge (Donnan) Exclusion in Removal of Arsenic from Water by a Negatively Charged Porous Nanofiltration Membrane , 2001 .

[18]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: Evaluating , 2011 .

[19]  Xiaofeng Lu,et al.  Preparation and characterization of NF composite membrane , 2002 .

[20]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Integrated system for recovery of CaCO3, NaCl and MgSO4·7H2O from nanofiltration retentate , 2004 .

[21]  T. E. Bates.  FACTORS AFFECTING CRITICAL NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS IN PLANTS AND THEIR EVALUATION: A REVIEW , 1971 .

[22]  Sirshendu De,et al.  Membrane filtration of leather plant effluent: Flux decline mechanism , 2005 .

[23]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[24]  K. Östergren,et al.  The influence of pH, salt and temperature on nanofiltration performance , 2008 .

[25]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[26]  Richard M. Lueptow,et al.  Membrane rejection of nitrogen compounds. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Oumar Sarr,et al.  A phenomenological mass transfer approach in nanofiltration of halide ions for a selective defluorination of brackish drinking water , 2003 .

[28]  Sharon B. Hornick,et al.  Factors affecting the nutritional quality of crops , 1992 .

[29]  J. Labanda,et al.  Separation of metal ions and chelating agents by nanofiltration , 2009 .

[30]  P. Imas.  Recent techniques in fertigation of horticultural crops in Israel , 2003 .

[31]  C. Revenga,et al.  Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. Baldwin.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS AFFECTING PLANT NUTRIENT UPTAKE FROM SOME SOILS , 1975 .

[33]  S. Nakao,et al.  The electrostatic and steric-hindrance model for the transport of charged solutes through nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[34]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Performance and mechanism of arsenic removal from water by a nanofiltration membrane , 2009 .

[35]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Forward with osmosis: emerging applications for greater sustainability. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Developing thin‐film‐composite forward osmosis membranes on the PES/SPSf substrate through interfacial polymerization , 2012 .

[37]  Rong Wang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[38]  How Yong Ng,et al.  A novel hybrid forward osmosis - nanofiltration (FO-NF) process for seawater desalination: Draw solution selection and system configuration , 2010 .

[39]  P. Jaouen,et al.  Mechanism of nitrate ions transfer in nanofiltration depending on pressure, pH, concentration and medium composition , 2004 .

[40]  Mattias Nilsson,et al.  Performance, energy and cost evaluation of a nanofiltration plant operated at elevated temperatures , 2008 .

[41]  Sherub Phuntsho,et al.  Influence of temperature and temperature difference in the performance of forward osmosis desalination process , 2012 .

[42]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module , 2010 .

[43]  Masaaki Ando,et al.  Separation performance of a nanofiltration membrane influenced by species and concentration of ions , 2005 .

[44]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[45]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[46]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Forward osmosis extractors , 1976 .

[47]  L. Zou,et al.  An alternative membrane treatment process to produce low-salt and high-nutrient recycled water suitable for irrigation purposes , 2011 .

[48]  S. Hong,et al.  Recovery of phosphate using multilayer polyelectrolyte nanofiltration membranes , 2009 .

[49]  Kevin F. Goss,et al.  Environmental flows, river salinity and biodiversity conservation: managing trade-offs in the Murray-Darling basin , 2003 .

[50]  Linda Zou,et al.  Brackish water desalination by a hybrid forward osmosis-nanofiltration system using divalent draw solute , 2012 .

[51]  Q. Schiermeier.  Water: Purification with a pinch of salt , 2008, Nature.

[52]  R. H. Stokes,et al.  The osmotic and activity coefficients of aqueous solutions of ammonium chloride and ammonium nitrate at 25 , 1953 .

[53]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[54]  P. Prádanos,et al.  Multi-ionic nanofiltration of highly concentrated salt mixtures in the seawater range , 2011 .

[55]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes:Treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy , 2004 .

[56]  C. T. Aravindakumar,et al.  Phosphate recovery by high flux low pressure multilayer membranes. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[57]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Double-Skinned Forward Osmosis Membranes for Reducing Internal Concentration Polarization within the Porous Sublayer , 2010 .

[58]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[59]  J. H. Kim,et al.  Removal of potassium chloride by nanofiltration from ion-exchanged solution containing potassium clavulanate , 2010, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[60]  Veera Gnaneswar Gude,et al.  Energy consumption and recovery in reverse osmosis , 2011 .

[61]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Highly Water-Soluble Magnetic Nanoparticles as Novel Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis for Water Reuse , 2010 .

[62]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Coupled model of concentration polarization and pore transport in crossflow nanofiltration , 2001 .

[63]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Modelling the effects of nanofiltration membrane properties on system cost assessment for desalination applications , 2007 .