On the Peter Principle: An agent based investigation into the consequential effects of social networks and behavioural factors

The Peter Principle is a theory that provides a paradoxical explanation for job incompetence in a hierarchical organisation. It argues that should staff be competent at a given level, their competence may not be implicit at higher levels due to the differences in the skill set required. Furthering the work of a recent investigation into the Peter Principle utilising agent based simulation, this paper explores external factors upon varying promotion strategies to assess efficiency. Through additional elements of social networks and organisational thought, a more representative view of workplace interaction is presented. Results of the simulation found that although the Peter Principle affects efficiency, it may not be to the levels previously suggested. Furthermore promotion on merit provided the most favourable maximum and minimum efficiency margins, given the absence of clear evidence pertaining to the existence of the Peter Principle.

[1]  Alessandro Pluchino,et al.  Efficient Promotion Strategies in a Hierarchical Organization , 2011, ArXiv.

[2]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[3]  Karianne Skovholt,et al.  Email Copies in Workplace Interaction , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  A. Furnham,et al.  Deciding on promotions and redundancies: Promoting people by ability, experience, gender and motivation , 2006 .

[5]  R. Langer,et al.  Where a pill won't reach. , 2003, Scientific American.

[6]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[7]  T. Bauer,et al.  Rejected But Still There: Shifting the Focus in Applicant Reactions to the Promotional Context , 2009 .

[8]  Julius Kane,et al.  Dynamics of the Peter Principle , 1970 .

[9]  D. Watts,et al.  An Experimental Study of Search in Global Social Networks , 2003, Science.

[10]  Leon Mann,et al.  THE LOST-LETTER TECHNIQUE: A TOOL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH , 1965 .

[11]  Derek de Solla Price,et al.  A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Jonathan P. West,et al.  Workplace Relations: Friendship Patterns and Consequences (According to Managers) , 2002 .

[13]  F. Morgeson,et al.  Reacting to Applicant Perspectives Research: What's Next? , 2009 .

[14]  L. Amaral,et al.  The web of human sexual contacts , 2001, Nature.

[15]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs , 1985 .

[16]  M. Sieverding ‘Be Cool!’: Emotional Costs of Hiding Feelings in a Job Interview , 2009 .

[17]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Increasing the salience of one's best selves can undermine inspiration by outstanding role models. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Chia-Huei Emily Ko,et al.  Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research , 2008 .

[19]  P. Hedström Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology , 2005 .

[20]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social mechanisms : an analytical approach to social theory , 1999 .

[21]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Envy and jealousy: Self and society. , 1991 .

[22]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[23]  John M. Light,et al.  The Relative Importance of Proximity and Status for Friendship Choices in Social Hierarchies , 1978 .

[24]  Kathleen Riach,et al.  Don't Screw the Crew: Exploring the Rules of Engagement in Organizational Romance , 2007 .

[25]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[26]  Mooweon Rhee The Time Relevance of Social Capital , 2007 .

[27]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the world-wide web , 2000 .

[28]  Yong He,et al.  Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[30]  Reka Albert,et al.  Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks , 1999 .

[31]  S H Strogatz,et al.  Random graph models of social networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Pablo Acosta Promotion dynamics the Peter Principle: Incumbents vs. external hires , 2010 .

[33]  James M. Malcomson,et al.  Performance, Promotion, and the Peter Principle , 2001 .

[34]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[35]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  The Peter Principle: A Theory of Decline , 2003, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  R. Burt The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[37]  Jack B. Hilliard,et al.  The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong , 1971 .

[38]  Alessandro Pluchino,et al.  The Peter Principle Revisited: A Computational Study , 2009, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[39]  Leonard Fontana,et al.  Clique Formation in a Regional Health Planning Agency , 1985 .

[40]  Rochelle Parks-Yancy The Effects of Social Group Membership and Social Capital Resources on Careers , 2006 .

[41]  Andrew P. Roach,et al.  Emergent Scale-free Social Networks in History: Burning and the Rise of English Protestantism , 2008 .

[42]  W. M. Bowler Organizational Goals versus the Dominant Coalition: A Critical View of the Value of Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 2006 .

[43]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[44]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex adaptive systems - an introduction to computational models of social life , 2009, Princeton studies in complexity.

[45]  Christian Borgs,et al.  First to market is not everything: an analysis of preferential attachment with fitness , 2007, STOC '07.

[46]  P. A. Losty,et al.  A Behavioural Theory of the Firm , 1965 .

[47]  Daniel J. Brass Men's and Women's Networks: A Study of Interaction Patterns and Influence In an Organization , 1985 .

[48]  Mason Porter,et al.  Small-world network , 2012, Scholarpedia.

[49]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[50]  J. Mueller,et al.  Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy? , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[52]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Superstars and me : Predicting the impact of role models on the self , 1997 .

[53]  Ljupco Kocarev,et al.  Game Theoretic Approach for Discovering Vulnerable Links in Complex Networks , 2008, TeNe.

[54]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Comparing lots before and after: Promotion rejectees' invidious reactions to promotees , 2004 .

[55]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[56]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Justice , 2005 .