Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: a case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–2009

This paper analyzes the relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations of computer science research activity. It analyzes the number of documents and citations and how they vary by number of authors. They are also analyzed (according to author set cardinality) under different circumstances, that is, when documents are written in different types of collaboration, when documents are published in different document types, when documents are published in different computer science subdisciplines, and, finally, when documents are published by journals with different impact factor quartiles. To investigate the above relationships, this paper analyzes the publications listed in the Web of Science and produced by active Spanish university professors between 2000 and 2009, working in the computer science field. Analyzing all documents, we show that the highest percentage of documents are published by three authors, whereas single-authored documents account for the lowest percentage. By number of citations, there is no positive association between the author cardinality and citation impact. Statistical tests show that documents written by two authors receive more citations per document and year than documents published by more authors. In contrast, results do not show statistically significant differences between documents published by two authors and one author. The research findings suggest that international collaboration results on average in publications with higher citation rates than national and institutional collaborations. We also find differences regarding citation rates between journals and conferences, across different computer science subdisciplines and journal quartiles as expected. Finally, our impression is that the collaborative level (number of authors per document) will increase in the coming years, and documents published by three or four authors will be the trend in computer science literature.

[1]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[2]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Nabil Amara,et al.  The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research , 1998 .

[4]  Guillaume Cabanac,et al.  Shaping the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: A scientometric study of 77 leading journals , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  David M. Rosenberg,et al.  Collaboration in scientific research: a critical need for freshwater ecology , 1999 .

[7]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications , 2009, Scientometrics.

[8]  Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al.  Spanish personal name variations in national and international biomedical databases: implications for information retrieval and bibliometric studies. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[9]  E. Garfield.  Use of Journal Citation Reports and Journal Performance Indicators in measuring short and long term journal impact. , 2000, Croatian medical journal.

[10]  Peter Weingart,et al.  Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[11]  Justin Solomon,et al.  Programmers, Professors, and Parasites: Credit and Co-Authorship in Computer Science , 2009, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[12]  Chien Hsiang Liao,et al.  How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks , 2011, Scientometrics.

[13]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia: A comparison between Europe and the USA , 2004 .

[14]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results , 1998, Scientometrics.

[15]  Rolf Zetterström,et al.  The number of authors of scientific publications , 2004, Acta paediatrica.

[16]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[17]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges , 2008 .

[18]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The Need for a Theory of citing , 1981, J. Documentation.

[19]  Lawrence J. Smolinsky,et al.  Citation rates in mathematics: a study of variation by subdiscipline , 2012, Scientometrics.

[20]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[21]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  The meaning of the Impact Factor , 2003 .

[22]  Jun Hu,et al.  The fruits of collaboration in a multidisciplinary field , 2010, Scientometrics.

[23]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research , 2011, Scientometrics.

[24]  Stanley Presser,et al.  Collaboration and the Quality of Research , 1980 .

[25]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  The role of conference publications in CS , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[26]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[27]  R. Hauptman.  How to Be a Successful Scholar: Publish Efficiently , 2005 .

[28]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[29]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[30]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science , 2009 .

[31]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies , 2004, Scientometrics.

[32]  Bárbara S. Lancho-Barrantes,et al.  Citation flows in the zones of influence of scientific collaborations , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  P. Boardman,et al.  Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital☆ , 2010 .

[34]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  Collaboration in computer science: a network science approach. Part II , 2011, ArXiv.

[35]  Massimo Franceschet.  The role of conference publications in computer science: a bibliometric view , 2010 .

[36]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[37]  Lance Fortnow,et al.  ViewpointTime for computer science to grow up , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[38]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2008, Scientometrics.

[39]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers? An investigation on the Italian university system , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[40]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 2005, Scientometrics.

[41]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[42]  Christine Laine,et al.  Exorcising Ghosts and Unwelcome Guests , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[43]  Jacques Wainer,et al.  Invisible work in standard bibliometric evaluation of computer science , 2011, Commun. ACM.