Evaluation approach for sustainable renewable energy systems under uncertain environment: A case study

Abstract The demand for energy in Egypt has increased dramatically due to the steady increase in economic and societal development. To meet this need, the use of more renewable energy resources is an essential part of the solution to the ultimate shortage of energy. Because of the multitude of factors involved, the selection of the most suitable renewable energy systems (RESs) is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. There are a good number of works associated with the design of MCDM methods, particularly under uncertain and ambiguous situations. However, efficient incorporation of ambiguity and uncertainty in decision making is still a challenging task, and thus this work proposes a hybrid MCDM approach for selecting the components of a sustainable RES under uncertain environments, utilizing different triangular neutrosophic numbers to deal with unclear information. This proposed hybrid approach starts with defining the relative importance of the selected sustainable criteria by using an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Later, in the second phase, this hybrid approach combines VIKOR and the TOPSIS to rank the RESs for a real-life case study. The results obtained indicate that concentrated solar power is the most suitable source of renewable energy for Egypt, with photoelectric power the second most suitable.

[1]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[2]  Arvind R. Singh,et al.  A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development , 2017 .

[3]  Ümran Şengül,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey , 2015 .

[4]  Razman Mat Tahar,et al.  Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia , 2014 .

[5]  Peide Liu,et al.  Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Based on Interval Neutrosophic Uncertain Linguistic Variables and Choquet Integral , 2016, Cognitive Computation.

[6]  Celal Özkale,et al.  Decision analysis application intended for selection of a power plant running on renewable energy sources , 2017 .

[7]  Jun Ye,et al.  Multiple attribute group decision making based on interval neutrosophic uncertain linguistic variables , 2017, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[8]  Jeffrey E. Lovich,et al.  Wildlife Conservation and Solar Energy Development in the Desert Southwest, United States , 2011 .

[9]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Assessment of concentrated solar power (CSP) technologies based on a modified intuitionistic fuzzy topsis and trigonometric entropy weights , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[10]  George Alex Thopil,et al.  A framework for sustainable utility scale renewable energy selection in South Africa , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[11]  A. Hatata,et al.  A feasibility study of small hydro power for selected locations in Egypt , 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[12]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field , 2019, Comput. Ind..

[13]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  An Integrated Delphi-DEMATEL-ELECTRE Method on Gray Numbers to Rank Technology Providers , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application , 2020, Soft Comput..

[15]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Selection of sustainable alternative energy source for shipping: Multi-criteria decision making under incomplete information , 2017 .

[16]  Ching-Ter Chang,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[17]  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari,et al.  An extension of best-worst method with D numbers: Application in evaluation of renewable energy resources , 2020 .

[18]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[19]  Ting Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China , 2018 .

[20]  Madson T. Silva,et al.  Land use change scenarios and their effects on hydropower energy in the Amazon. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Multicriteria Planning of Post‐Earthquake Sustainable Reconstruction , 2002 .

[22]  H. Gitinavard,et al.  A soft computing based-modified ELECTRE model for renewable energy policy selection with unknown information , 2017 .

[23]  Maamar Bettayeb,et al.  Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method , 2020 .

[24]  M. M. Aman,et al.  A review of Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) issues of solar energy system , 2015 .

[25]  Xinying Li,et al.  Portfolio optimization of renewable energy projects under type-2 fuzzy environment with sustainability perspective , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[26]  K. S. Ravichandran,et al.  Scientific Decision Framework for Evaluation of Renewable Energy Sources under Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Set with Partially Known Weight Information , 2019, Sustainability.

[27]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  A novel integrated decision-making approach for the evaluation and selection of renewable energy technologies , 2018, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[28]  H. Di̇nçer,et al.  Multidimensional evaluation of global investments on the renewable energy with the integrated fuzzy decision‐making model under the hesitancy , 2019, International Journal of Energy Research.

[29]  Samuel Alexander,et al.  Degrowth, energy descent, and ‘low-tech’ living: Potential pathways for increased resilience in times of crisis , 2016, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[30]  M. Naeth,et al.  Perspectives on environmental impacts and a land reclamation strategy for solar and wind energy systems. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Abdelkrim Liazid,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system , 2017 .

[32]  Khalid Zaman,et al.  The impact of climate change and energy resources on biodiversity loss: Evidence from a panel of selected Asian countries , 2018 .

[33]  Ki-Hyun Kim,et al.  Solar energy: Potential and future prospects , 2018 .

[34]  G. Büyüközkan,et al.  An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey , 2016 .

[35]  Samuel Asumadu-Sarkodie,et al.  A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation , 2016 .

[36]  Pavel Loskot,et al.  Mitigating the current energy crisis in Nepal with renewable energy sources , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[37]  Veronica Campos-Guzman,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis with Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A review of approaches for the sustainability evaluation of renewable energy technologies , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[38]  E. de Oliveira Fernandes,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods for Renewable Energy Systems on Islands , 2015 .

[39]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations , 2017 .

[40]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods , 2000 .

[41]  Enrique Mu,et al.  Understanding the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2017 .

[42]  Djula Borozan,et al.  Technical and total factor energy efficiency of European regions: A two-stage approach , 2018, Energy.

[43]  Dragan Komljenovic,et al.  A multicriteria decision making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia , 2016 .

[44]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: the case of Turkey , 2013 .