Recommendations for the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring Based on the Development of the Deep Tutor Service

We present in this paper the design of DeepTutor, the first dialoguebased intelligent tutoring system based on Learning Progressions, and its implications for developing the Generalized Framework for Intelligent Tutoring. We also present the design of SEMILAR, a semantic similarity toolkit, that helps researchers investigate and author semantic similarity models for evaluating natural language student inputs in conversatioanl ITSs. DeepTutor has been developed as a web service while SEMILAR is a Java library. Based on our experience with developing DeepTutor and SEMILAR, we contrast three different models for developing a standardized architecture for intelligent tutoring systems: (1) a single-entry web service coupled with XML protocols for queries and data, (2) a bundle of web services, and (3) library-API. Based on the analysis of the three models, recommendations are

[1]  K. VanLehn The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Computational Intelligence for Technology Enhanced Learning , 2010, Computational Intelligence for Technology Enhanced Learning.

[4]  Nobal B. Niraula,et al.  The SIMILAR Corpus: A Resource To Foster The Qualitative Understanding of Semantic Similarity of Texts , 2012 .

[5]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[6]  Aaron Rogat,et al.  Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based Approach to Reform. CPRE Research Report # RR-63. , 2009 .

[7]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Handbook of latent semantic analysis , 2007 .

[8]  Vasile Rus,et al.  SEMILAR: The Semantic Similarity Toolkit , 2013, ACL.

[9]  Reva Freedman,et al.  SGML-Based Markup as a Step toward Improving Knowledge Acquisition for Text Generation , 1998 .

[10]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Guru: A Computer Tutor That Models Expert Human Tutors , 2012, ITS.

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  Ajith Abraham,et al.  Intelligent and Interactive Web-Based Tutoring System in Engineering Education: Reviews, Perspectives and Development , 2010, Computational Intelligence for Technology Enhanced Learning.

[13]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Recent Advances in Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2013, AI Mag..

[14]  Vasile Rus,et al.  A Comparison of Greedy and Optimal Assessment of Natural Language Student Input Using Word-to-Word Similarity Metrics , 2012, BEA@NAACL-HLT.

[15]  C. Kelley,et al.  CONSORTIUM FOR POLICY RESEARCH IN EDUCATION , 2012 .