Topography of selectively laser melted surfaces: A comparison of different measurement methods

Selective laser melting (SLM) of metals produces surface topographies that are challenging to measure. Multiple areal surface topography measurement technologies are available, which allow reconstruction of information rich, three-dimensional digital surface models. However, the capability of such technologies to capture intricate topographic details of SLM parts has not yet been investigated. This work explores the topography of a SLM Ti6Al4V part, as reconstructed from measurements by various optical and non-optical technologies. Discrepancies in the reconstruction of local topographic features are investigated through alignment and quantitative assessment of local differences. ISO 25178-2 areal texture parameters are computed as further comparison indicators.

[1]  Jon Petzing,et al.  Focus variation microscope: linear theory and surface tilt sensitivity. , 2016, Applied optics.

[2]  Bengt-Göran Rosén,et al.  Software relocation of 3D surface topography measurements , 2001 .

[3]  Gerd Witt,et al.  Characterization of typical surface effects in additive manufacturing with confocal microscopy , 2015 .

[4]  H Han Haitjema,et al.  An international comparison of surface texture parameters quantification on polymer artefacts using optical instruments , 2016 .

[5]  R. Leach.  Introduction to Surface Texture Measurement , 2011 .

[6]  Richard K. Leach,et al.  TOPICAL REVIEW: Bandwidth characteristics and comparisons of surface texture measuring instruments , 2010 .

[7]  Liam Blunt,et al.  Areal surface texture data extraction from X-ray computed tomography reconstructions of metal additively manufactured parts , 2017 .

[8]  Franz Helmli,et al.  Focus Variation Instruments , 2011 .

[9]  J. Lifton,et al.  A simulation-based study on the influence of beam hardening in X-ray computed tomography for dimensional metrology. , 2015, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[10]  R. Leach.  Optical measurement of surface topography , 2011 .

[11]  Gavin D. MacAulay,et al.  Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing , 2015 .

[12]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Computed tomography for dimensional metrology , 2011 .

[13]  P. Groot.  Coherence Scanning Interferometry , 2011 .

[14]  T. Kwon,et al.  The Influence of Process Parameters on the Surface Roughness of a 3D-Printed Co–Cr Dental Alloy Produced via Selective Laser Melting , 2016 .

[15]  I. Jolliffe.  Principal Component Analysis , 2005 .

[16]  Nicola Senin,et al.  Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: a review , 2016 .

[17]  Nicola Senin,et al.  Towards an additive surface atlas , 2016 .

[18]  Anders Snis,et al.  Effect of process parameters settings and thickness on surface roughness of EBM produced Ti‐6Al‐4V , 2012 .

[19]  Roger Artigas,et al.  Imaging confocal microscopy , 2020, Advances in Optical Surface Texture Metrology.

[20]  H Han Haitjema,et al.  Uncertainty in measurement of surface topography , 2015, Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties.