HiMoP: A three-component architecture to create more human-acceptable social-assistive robots

Generation of autonomous behavior for robots is a general unsolved problem. Users perceive robots as repetitive tools that do not respond to dynamic situations. This research deals with the generation of natural behaviors in assistive service robots for dynamic domestic environments, particularly, a motivational-oriented cognitive architecture to generate more natural behaviors in autonomous robots. The proposed architecture, called HiMoP, is based on three elements: a Hierarchy of needs to define robot drives; a set of Motivational variables connected to robot needs; and a Pool of finite-state machines to run robot behaviors. The first element is inspired in Alderfer’s hierarchy of needs, which specifies the variables defined in the motivational component. The pool of finite-state machine implements the available robot actions, and those actions are dynamically selected taking into account the motivational variables and the external stimuli. Thus, the robot is able to exhibit different behaviors even under similar conditions. A customized version of the “Speech Recognition and Audio Detection Test,” proposed by the RoboCup Federation, has been used to illustrate how the architecture works and how it dynamically adapts and activates robots behaviors taking into account internal variables and external stimuli.

[1]  C. Morris,et al.  Psychology : An Introduction , 1968 .

[2]  T. Steimer,et al.  The biology of fear- and anxiety-related behaviors , 2002, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[3]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[4]  D. Berlyne A theory of human curiosity. , 1954, British journal of psychology.

[5]  Andrew G. Barto,et al.  An Adaptive Robot Motivational System , 2006, SAB.

[6]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[7]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  A Motivational System for Regulating Human-Robot Interaction , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[8]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[9]  José María Cañas,et al.  Behavior-based Iterative Component Architecture for robotic applications with the Nao humanoid , 2008 .

[10]  Joseph J. Paton,et al.  Big behavioral data: psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  A Robust Layered Control Syste For A Mobile Robot , 2022 .

[12]  Robert T. Ross,et al.  Mathematico-Deductive Theory of Rote Learning , 1941 .

[13]  Dolapo Peter Olagoke,et al.  Motivation and information management as a tool of job satisfaction of employees in Nigeria , 2015 .

[14]  C. Alderfer An empirical test of a new theory of human needs , 1969 .

[15]  Luis J. Manso,et al.  Testing a Fully Autonomous Robotic Salesman in Real Scenarios , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions.

[16]  Masahiro Fujita,et al.  Ethological modeling and architecture for an entertainment robot , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[17]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Principles of Artificial Intelligence , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  Juan Fasola,et al.  A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly , 2013, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[19]  Ken Resnicow,et al.  Toward systematic integration between self-determination theory and motivational interviewing as examples of top-down and bottom-up intervention development: autonomy or volition as a fundamental theoretical principle , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[20]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  A robot architecture based on situated modules , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[21]  Lynne E. Parker,et al.  ALLIANCE: an architecture for fault tolerant, cooperative control of heterogeneous mobile robots , 1994 .

[22]  María Malfaz,et al.  A Biologically Inspired Architecture for an Autonomous and Social Robot , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[23]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Combining deliberation, reactivity, and motivation in the context of a behavior-based robot architecture , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01EX515).

[24]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. , 2004 .

[25]  Ibrahim A. Hameed,et al.  User Acceptance of Social Robots , 2016, ACHI 2016.

[26]  A. Maslow A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[27]  Monica N. Nicolescu,et al.  A hierarchical architecture for behavior-based robots , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[28]  Robert T. Ross,et al.  Mathematico Deductive Theory of Rote Learning: A Study in Scientific Methodology , 1940 .

[29]  João Luís Alves Apóstolo,et al.  The effects of guided imagery on comfort, depression, anxiety, and stress of psychiatric inpatients with depressive disorders. , 2009, Archives of psychiatric nursing.

[30]  Maria Fox,et al.  PDDL2.1: An Extension to PDDL for Expressing Temporal Planning Domains , 2003, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[31]  Ulrich Nehmzow,et al.  A Model of Habituation Applied to Mobile Robots , 2007 .

[32]  Cecilio Angulo,et al.  Using a cognitive architecture for general purpose service robot control , 2015, Connect. Sci..

[33]  Anders Orebäck,et al.  BERRA: a research architecture for service robots , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).