From simulations to real: Investigating young students' learning and transfer from simulations to real tasks

Research has explored the use of simulations for education and training, and attention is turning to how they might support learning in school subjects such as mathematics and science. However, existing studies have mostly concentrated on older students, and if simulations help build knowledge useful for solving problems within the simulation, rather than possible transfer beyond the simulation. This paper reports on a study investigating 5 year olds' learning transfer from simulations introducing simple circuit procedures and concepts, to equipment-based tasks. The study explored for evidence of learning transfer, using an analytical framework that aligned transfer strategy indicators with cognitive process dimensions, to identify transfer events and understand the thinking skills students applied during them. Findings supported the learning value of simulations, indicating young students transferred procedural knowledge to the equipment tasks, with some also demonstrating basic conceptual transfer. They also suggested transfer tasks can provide opportunities to exercise higher order thinking, through activating processes including reflection, evaluation, analysis and abstraction. Such capabilities are highly valued, and central to school achievement and development of learner independence and self-direction. Practitioner Notes What is already known about this topic Simulations can develop knowledge useful for solving problems within the simulation. Simulations can be effective for learning mathematics and science procedures. Between-simulation transfer engages higher order processing. What this paper adds Evidence of young students' procedural learning transfer, from simulations to real tasks. Some evidence of young students' naive conceptual transfer, from simulations to real tasks. Evidence of the value of transfer tasks for higher order thinking development. Implications for practice and/or policy Transfer tasks provide opportunities for young students to exercise higher order thinking and problem solving. Teachers should consider transfer tasks for extending procedural learning to real tasks. Teachers are important for scaffolding young students' concept formation during transfer tasks, to ensure accurate knowledge development. Simulations can be effective for developing transferrable procedural knowledge, but conceptual transfer should not be assumed.

[1]  Z. C. Zacharia,et al.  Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  Brittany Huber,et al.  Young children's transfer of learning from a touchscreen device , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Franck Ganier,et al.  Evaluation of procedural learning transfer from a virtual environment to a real situation: a case study on tank maintenance training , 2014, Ergonomics.

[4]  D. Miles Simulation Learning and Transfer in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Grounded Theory Study. , 2018, The Journal of nursing education.

[5]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Physical versus Virtual Manipulative Experimentation in Physics Learning. , 2011 .

[6]  Peter W. Airasian,et al.  The Role of Assessment in the Revised Taxonomy , 2002 .

[7]  Tomi Jaakkola,et al.  Fostering elementary school students' understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits of Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum , 2014 .

[9]  R. Mayer Rote Versus Meaningful Learning , 2002 .

[10]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[11]  Jorge Trindade,et al.  Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Kelly Dickerson,et al.  They can interact, but can they learn? Toddlers' transfer learning from touchscreens and television. , 2015, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  Garry Falloon,et al.  Using simulations to teach young students science concepts: An Experiential Learning theoretical analysis , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Petros Georghiades,et al.  RESEARCH REPORT , 2004 .

[15]  Marios Papaevripidou,et al.  Is physicality an important aspect of learning through science experimentation among kindergarten students , 2012 .

[16]  P. Pintrich The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing , 2002 .

[17]  Terry K. Smith Elementary Science Instruction: Examining a Virtual Environment for Evidence of Learning, Engagement, and 21st Century Competencies. , 2014 .

[18]  Silvia B. Lovato,et al.  Young Children Learning from Touch Screens: Taking a Wider View , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[19]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Blending Physical and Virtual Manipulatives: An Effort to Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding through Science Laboratory Experimentation , 2012 .

[20]  M. Veenman Metacognition in Science Education: Defi nitions, Constituents, and Their Intricate Relation with Cognition , 2012 .

[21]  Hsin-Kai Wu,et al.  Designing Applications for Physics Learning: Facilitating High School Students' Conceptual Understanding by Using Tablet PCS , 2015 .

[22]  T. Jong,et al.  Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Circuits in Secondary Vocational Engineering Education: Combining Traditional Instruction with Inquiry Learning in a Virtual Lab , 2013 .

[23]  Cédric Buche,et al.  Transfer of learning in virtual environments: a new challenge? , 2008, Virtual Reality.

[24]  Barbara A. Burns,et al.  A Comparison of Concrete and Virtual Manipulative Use in Third- and Fourth-Grade Mathematics , 2011 .

[25]  David W. Brooks,et al.  The Impact of Virtual Manipulatives on First Grade Geometry Instruction and Learning , 2006 .

[26]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall , 2014, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[27]  D. Ardianto,et al.  COMPARISON OF STUDENTS' SCIENTIFIC LITERACY IN INTEGRATED SCIENCE LEARNING THROUGH MODEL OF GUIDED DISCOVERY AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING , 2016 .

[28]  Petros Georghiades,et al.  Beyond conceptual change learning in science education: focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition , 2000 .

[29]  Alexis R. Lauricella,et al.  Measuring with Murray: Touchscreen technology and preschoolers' STEM learning , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..