Applications of Principal Component Analysis Integrated with GIS

Abstract Principal Component Analysis is a statistical instrument able to identify the variables explaining most variation within a sample. When the lines are administrative units within a region, and the input variable account for a specific issue (e.g., level of development etc.), Principal Component Analysis can be used to pinpoint the variables explaining mostly the specific issue. Moreover, if used in conjunction with GIS modeling, the entire approach produces hierarchies of the administrative units, which by mapping allow for the identification of hotspots (e.g., underdeveloped regions etc.) that are at the core of intervention policies. The presentation examines several examples from research aiming to assess the level of development in Romania, Ialomiţa hydrographic basin, the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve and Iasi County. The results indicate the utility of the approach as a research instrument, but also for strategic planning purposes. Specifically, they allow for pinpointing the variables that best account for the level of development, describing economic, social, demographic, education, infrastructure and cultural aspects. The results indicate that development cannot be assessed using variables pertaining to a single sector, as in all cases the relevant variables account for economic, social, cultural, or demographic issues.

[1]  J. DeCoster Overview of Factor Analysis , 1998 .

[2]  Kate Hunt,et al.  Theoretical and methodological developments , 2012 .

[3]  Mohan Munasinghe,et al.  Measuring sustainable development , 1997 .

[4]  J. Blažek,et al.  Can development axes be identified by socio-economic variables? The case of Czechia , 2009 .

[5]  Ad Astra,et al.  Reproducibility in computer-intensive sciences , 2002 .

[6]  Becky P.Y. Loo,et al.  Are There Useful Yardsticks of Population Size and Income Level for Building Metro Systems? Some Worldwide Evidence , 2010 .

[7]  Francis Harvey,et al.  Local‐government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  David F Duncan Uses and misuses of epidemiology in shaping and assessing drug policy , 1997, Journal of Primary Prevention.

[9]  Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor Systemic theory applied to ecology, geography and spatial planning , 2011 .

[10]  D. Perrons,et al.  Regional performance and inequality: linking economic and social development through a capabilities approach , 2012 .

[11]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Correlations and complementarities in data and methods through Principal Components Analysis (PCA) applied to the results of the SPIn-Eco Project. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  B. Mihai,et al.  Evaluation of landslide susceptibility using multivariate statistical methods : a case study in the Prahova subcarpathians , Romania , 2009 .

[13]  Levels of Biological Diversity: a Spatial Approach to Assessment Methods , 2008 .

[14]  A. Rafila,et al.  Case Study – Romania , 2012, Biopreparedness and Public Health.

[15]  A. Magurran,et al.  Patterns of speciation in endemic Mexican Goodeid fish: sexual conflict or early radiation? , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[16]  J. Oosterhaven Complex spatial systems : The modelling foundations of urban and regional analysis , 2002 .

[17]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[18]  Stephen M. Stigler,et al.  The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900 , 1986 .

[19]  A. Petrișor,et al.  In search of a relevant index measuring territorial disparities in a transition country. Romania as a case study , 2013 .

[20]  G. Dunteman Principal Components Analysis , 1989 .

[21]  D. Moran,et al.  Measuring sustainable development - Nation by nation , 2008 .