Questions : Logic and Interactions

The early years of the twenty first century have seen an increased interest in Questions. This is partly due to the rise of interest in interaction, where questions play a key role. As components of context, they are significant actors in grammatical phenomena such as ellipsis and focus. They are of fundamental importance in explicating inquiry and of course in question answering. This update to Jeroen Groenendijk and Martin Stokhof’s 1997 article focuses on the two main areas of logico-linguistic research on questions recently: first, the logic and ontology of questions—what are questions and how do they relate to other semantic entities? Second, questions in interaction— issues such as how questions affect context, why questions get asked, what range of responses—not just answers—do questions give rise to. The boundaries between these two areas is somewhat artificial and, therefore, not easy to demarcate, particularly in an era where meanings are often explicated in terms of context change. A brief indication of other research in the area is provided before the concluding remarks.

[1]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  For a Structured Meaning Account of Questions and Answers , 2001 .

[2]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1986 .

[3]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  NEGATIVE BIAS IN POLAR QUESTIONS , 2005 .

[4]  Nissim Francez,et al.  Bilattices and the Semantics of Natural Language Questions , 2002 .

[5]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Inquisitive Semantics: Two Possibilities for Disjunction , 2009, TbiLLC.

[6]  Chung-chieh Shan,et al.  A Modal Interpretation of the Logic of Interrogation , 2006, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[7]  J. Bregetzer [The liar]. , 1989, Revue de l'infirmiere.

[8]  Raquel. FernaÌndez Rovira Non-sentential utterances in dialogue : classification, resolution and use , 2006 .

[9]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  The interactive stance : meaning for conversation , 2012 .

[10]  Melvin Fitting,et al.  Bilattices and the Semantics of Logic Programming , 1991, J. Log. Program..

[11]  Matthew Purver,et al.  CLARIE: Handling Clarification Requests in a Dialogue System , 2006 .

[12]  Dorota Leszczynska-Jasion,et al.  A Loop-Free Decision Procedure for Modal Propositional Logics K4, S4 and S5 , 2009, J. Philos. Log..

[13]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Austinian Propositions, Davidsonian Events and Perception Complements , 1997 .

[14]  Paul Dekker,et al.  4: Optimal Inquisitive Discourse , 2007 .

[15]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives , 2001 .

[16]  Maribel Romero,et al.  On Negative Yes/No Questions , 2004 .

[17]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Clarification, Ellipsis, and the Nature of Contextual Updates in Dialogue , 2004 .

[18]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Austinian Truth, Attitudes and Type Theory , 2005 .

[19]  Maria Aloni,et al.  A Formal Treatment of the Pragmatics of Questions and Attitudes* , 2005 .

[20]  Matthew L. Ginsberg Bilattices and Modal Operators , 1990, J. Log. Comput..

[21]  R. Scha Logical foundations for question answering , 1983 .

[22]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics , 2009 .

[23]  Johan van Benthem,et al.  Toward a Dynamic Logic of Questions , 2009, J. Philos. Log..

[24]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Type-shifting rules and the semantics of interrogatives , 1988 .

[25]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  2: The Logic of Interrogation , 2007 .

[26]  William Jaworski,et al.  The logic of how-questions , 2007, Synthese.

[27]  Jens Allwood,et al.  The Swedish Spoken Language Corpus at Göteborg University , 1999 .

[28]  Jonathan Ginzburg Abstraction and Ontology: Questions as Propositional Abstracts in Type Theory with Records , 2005, J. Log. Comput..

[29]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  Issue-based Dialogue Management , 2002 .

[30]  Andrzej Wisniewski,et al.  Socratic Proofs and Paraconsistency: A Case Study , 2005, Stud Logica.

[31]  Prashant Parikh,et al.  A Game-Theoretic Account of Implicature , 1992, TARK.

[32]  Utpal Lahiri,et al.  Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts , 2002 .

[33]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1999 .

[34]  Yael Sharvit,et al.  A question of strength: on NPIs in interrogative clauses , 2007 .

[35]  R. van Rooij Negative Polarity Items in Questions: Strength as Relevance , 2003 .

[36]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions , 1991 .