Current status and restoration options for floodplains along the Danube River.

Floodplains are key ecosystems of riverine landscapes and provide a multitude of ecosystem services. In most of the large river systems worldwide, a tremendous reduction of floodplain area has occurred in the last 100 years and this loss continues due to pressures such as land use change, river regulation, and dam construction. In the Danube River Basin, the extent of floodplains has been reduced by 68% compared to their pre-regulation area, with the highest losses occurring in the Upper Danube and the lowest in the Danube Delta. In this paper, we illustrate the restoration potential of floodplains along the Danube and its major tributaries. Via two case studies in the Upper and Lower Danube, we demonstrate the effects of restoration measures on the river ecosystem, addressing different drivers, pressures, and opportunities in these regions. The potential area for floodplain restoration based on land use and hydromorphological characteristics amounts to 8102 km(2) for the whole Danube River, of which estimated 75% have a high restoration potential. A comparison of floodplain status and options for restoration in the Upper and Lower Danube shows clear differences in drivers and pressures, but certain common options apply in both sections if the local context of stakeholders and societal needs are considered. New approaches to flood protection using natural water retention measures offer increased opportunities for floodplain restoration, but conflicting societal needs and legal frameworks may restrict implementation. Emerging issues such as climate change and invasive non-native species will need careful consideration in future restoration planning to minimize unintended effects and to increase the resilience of floodplains to these and other pressures.

[1]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive and Economic Valuation of Wetlands The Restoration of Floodplains along the River Elbe , 2007 .

[2]  C. Johnston,et al.  The Potential Importance of Boundaries of Fluvial Ecosystems , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  Colin R. Townsend,et al.  The Patch Dynamics Concept of Stream Community Ecology , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[4]  T. Hein,et al.  Ecohydrology, key-concept for large river restoration , 2007 .

[5]  G. Bornette,et al.  Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains , 2002 .

[6]  B. Moss,et al.  The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise? , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Stephan Gollasch,et al.  National checklist for aquatic alien species in Germany , 2006 .

[8]  Tim Hess,et al.  A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England , 2010 .

[9]  Thomas Hein,et al.  The impact of surface water exchange on the nutrient and particle dynamics in side-arms along the River Danube, Austria. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Thomas Hein,et al.  Managing the world’s most international river: the Danube River Basin , 2010 .

[11]  S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern,et al.  Large-scale controls on potential respiration and denitrification in riverine floodplains , 2012, Ecological engineering.

[12]  U. Uehlinger,et al.  Rivers of Europe , 2009 .

[13]  S. Bogdanović Legal aspects of transboundary water management in the Danube Basin , 2005 .

[14]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionality of Rivers and Floodplains , 2006 .

[15]  I. Zsuffa,et al.  Multi-criteria decision support for the revitalisation of river floodplains , 2001 .

[16]  B. Webb,et al.  Long-term changes in river temperature and the influence of climatic and hydrological factors , 2007 .

[17]  A. D. Buijse,et al.  Changes in fish populations in Danube delta lakes: effects of hydrology and water quality change. Review of results and potential for rehabilitation , 2005 .

[18]  E. Schneider The ecological functions of the Danubian floodplains and their restoration with special regard to the Lower Danube. , 2002 .

[19]  K. Tockner,et al.  An extension of the flood pulse concept. , 2000 .

[20]  K. Tockner,et al.  Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems , 2010 .

[21]  D. Gilvear,et al.  The role of lateral connectivity in the maintenance of macrophyte diversity and production in large rivers , 2013 .

[22]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[23]  A. Blaschke,et al.  Optimised management strategies for the Biosphere reserve Lobau, Austria - based on a multi criteria decision support system , 2006 .

[24]  D. Gilvear,et al.  Channel dynamics and geomorphic variability as controls on gravel bar vegetation; River Tummel, Scotland , 2006 .

[25]  H. Habersack,et al.  Floodplain evaluation matrix (FEM): An interdisciplinary method for evaluating river floodplains in the context of integrated flood risk management , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[26]  H. Habersack,et al.  Large Rivers in the Anthropocene: Insights and tools for understanding climatic, land use, and reservoir influences , 2014 .

[27]  José I. Barredo,et al.  Major flood disasters in Europe: 1950–2005 , 2007 .

[28]  T. Hein,et al.  Impact of drying and re-flooding of sediment on phosphorus dynamics of river-floodplain systems , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  C. Amoros,et al.  Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands. III. Vegetation survey and monitoring optimization , 1996 .

[30]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[31]  T. Hein,et al.  The hydrochemical response of small and shallow floodplain water bodies to temporary surface water connections with the main river , 2015 .

[32]  P. Winkler,et al.  Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  Stefan Schindler,et al.  Multifunctionality of floodplain landscapes: relating management options to ecosystem services , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[34]  W. P. Cofino,et al.  Concepts in river ecology: implications for indicator development , 1997 .

[35]  Bernhard Schober,et al.  A novel assessment of the role of Danube floodplains in flood hazard reduction (FEM method) , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[36]  R. E. Grift,et al.  Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe , 2002 .

[37]  P. Pekárová,et al.  Is the Water Temperature of the Danube River at Bratislava, Slovakia, Rising? , 2008 .

[38]  F. Rahel,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Climate Change on Aquatic Invasive Species , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[39]  Christian Baumgartner,et al.  The Integrated River Engineering Project for the free-flowing Danube in the Austrian Alluvial Zone National Park : contradictory goals and mutual solutions , 2003 .

[40]  M. Zessner,et al.  Effects of climate change on nitrate loads in a large river: the Austrian Danube as example , 2008 .

[41]  N. Willby,et al.  Harmonising the bioassessment of large rivers in the absence of near‐natural reference conditions – a case study of the Danube River , 2012 .