Can observers exploit enhanced-disparity information to control reaching movements within telepresence environments?

The control of inter-camera distance (ICD) can be used to change the range of binocular disparities available from a visual scene viewed remotely. Binocular disparity is considered pre-eminent in the control of reaching behavior. One reason for this is that once suitably scaled it can specify metrical depth relationships within a scene. Such information is necessary in order to plan the transport and grasped phase of a reaching movement. However whether an observer can take advantage of enhanced disparities to control reaching is unknown. Here we examine the effects of manipulating ICD on reaching movements with ICDs ranging from 6.5cm to 26cm. Typically sized, real world objects were placed in a scene and reaching performance was assessed. An experimental sequence consisted of three blocks. The first and last block used a normal ICD/IOD of 6.5cm whereas the middle block used an increased ICD. Larger than normal ICD were found to disrupt reaching performance, with slower peak velocities and smaller grip apertures being observed. This was more pronounced for unfamiliar objects. Little evidence for learning was found.

[1]  H. Wallach,et al.  Modification of stereoscopic depth-perception. , 1963, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  A M Wing,et al.  Assessing and reporting the accuracy of position measurements made with optical tracking systems. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Disparity Scaling and the Perception of Frontoparallel Surfaces , 1995, Perception.

[4]  B. Rogers,et al.  The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues , 1996, Vision Research.

[5]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Cues to Viewing Distance for Stereoscopic Depth Constancy , 1998, Perception.

[6]  S. Judge,et al.  Adaptation to Telestereoscopic Viewing Measured by One-Handed Ball-Catching Performance , 1988, Perception.

[7]  M. Jeannerod The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[8]  J. M. Foley Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[9]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  The design of telepresence systems: the task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax. , 1999, International journal of cognitive ergonomics.

[10]  Hc. Dijkertnan The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane. I. Effects of visual form agnosia , 1997 .

[11]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis , 1992, Vision Research.

[13]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-time Signal Processing. Vol.2 , 2001 .

[15]  D. Post,et al.  A Study of Direct Distance Estimations to Familiar Objects in Real-Space, Two-Dimensional, and Stereographic Displays , 1982 .