Comparison of population coherence of place cells in hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA3

The hippocampus, a critical brain structure for navigation, context-dependent learning and episodic memory, is composed of anatomically heterogeneous subregions. These regions differ in their anatomical inputs as well as in their internal circuitry. A major feature of the CA3 region is its recurrent collateral circuitry, by which the CA3 pyramidal cells make excitatory synaptic contacts on each other. In contrast, pyramidal cells in the CA1 region are not extensively interconnected. Although these differences have inspired numerous theoretical models of differential processing capacities of these two regions, there have been few reports of robust differences in the firing properties of CA1 and CA3 neurons in behaving animals. The most extensively studied of these properties is the spatially selective firing of hippocampal ‘place cells’. Here we report that in a dynamically changing environment, in which familiar landmarks on the behavioural track and along the wall are rotated relative to each other, the population representation of the environment is more coherent between the original and cue-altered environments in CA3 than in CA1. These results demonstrate a functional heterogeneity between the place cells of CA3 and CA1 at the level of neural population representations.

[1]  D Marr,et al.  Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. , 1971, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[3]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[4]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  G. Paxinos The Rat nervous system , 1985 .

[6]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Preserved spatial coding in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells during reversible suppression of CA3c output: evidence for pattern completion in hippocampus , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Amaral,et al.  Organization of intrahippocampal projections originating from CA3 pyramidal cells in the rat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade‐off , 1994, Hippocampus.

[10]  E. Rolls,et al.  Computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory , 1994, Hippocampus.

[11]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  Dynamics of learning and recall at excitatory recurrent synapses and cholinergic modulation in rat hippocampal region CA3 , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Theta phase precession in hippocampal neuronal populations and the compression of temporal sequences , 1996, Hippocampus.

[13]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. , 1997, Science.

[14]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Cues that hippocampal place cells encode: Dynamic and hierarchical representation of local and distal stimuli , 1997, Hippocampus.

[15]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping in a Continuous Attractor Neural Network Model , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  E. Rolls,et al.  Neural networks and brain function , 1998 .

[17]  P. Dayan,et al.  The Involvement of Recurrent Connections in Area CA3 in Establishing the Properties of Place Fields: a Model , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Paul E. Gilbert,et al.  Testing neural network models of memory with behavioral experiments , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  A. Mcguire,et al.  What is it to be a model? , 2000, HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care.

[20]  H. Eichenbaum A cortical–hippocampal system for declarative memory , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  E. Rolls,et al.  Role of long‐term synaptic modification in short‐term memory , 2001, Hippocampus.

[22]  Bruno Poucet,et al.  Remapping of place cell firing patterns after maze rotations , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  James J Knierim,et al.  Dynamic Interactions between Local Surface Cues, Distal Landmarks, and Intrinsic Circuitry in Hippocampal Place Cells , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Inah Lee,et al.  Differential contribution of NMDA receptors in hippocampal subregions to spatial working memory , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Menno P. Witter,et al.  Place Cells and Place Recognition Maintained by Direct Entorhinal-Hippocampal Circuitry , 2002, Science.

[26]  M. Quirk,et al.  Requirement for Hippocampal CA3 NMDA Receptors in Associative Memory Recall , 2002, Science.

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[28]  Kathryn J Jeffery,et al.  Heterogeneous Modulation of Place Cell Firing by Changes in Context , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Single unit activity in the rat hippocampus during a spatial memory task , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  B. McNaughton,et al.  The contributions of position, direction, and velocity to single unit activity in the hippocampus of freely-moving rats , 1983, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  J. Guzowski,et al.  Differences in Hippocampal Neuronal Population Responses to Modifications of an Environmental Context: Evidence for Distinct, Yet Complementary, Functions of CA3 and CA1 Ensembles , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.