Effect of friction on electron transfer in biomolecules

In biological and chemical electron transfer, a nuclear reaction coordinate is coupled to other nuclear and/or ‘‘solvent’’ coordinates. This coupling, or friction, if strong enough, may substantially slow down motion along the reaction coordinate, and thus vitiate the assumption of electron transfer being nonadiabatic with respect to the nuclei. Here, a simple, fully quantum mechanical model for electron transfer using a one mode treatment which incorporates this coupling is studied. Path integral methods are used to study the dependence of the reaction rate on friction, and the limits of the moderate and the high friction are analyzed in detail. The first limit will prevail if the reaction coordinate is, e.g., an underdamped nuclear vibration, whereas the second limit will prevail if it corresponds to a slow or diffusive degree of freedom. In the high‐friction limit, the reaction rate is explicitly shown to vary between the nonadiabatic and adiabatic expressions as the tunneling matrix element and/or the friction are varied. Starting from a path integral expression for the time evolution of the reduced density matrix for the electron and reaction coordinate, a Fokker–Planck equation is obtained which reduces in the high‐friction limit to a Smoluchowski equation similar to one solved by Zusman.

[1]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Rate theories and puzzles of hemeprotein kinetics. , 1985, Science.

[2]  Hakim,et al.  Quantum theory of a free particle interacting with a linearly dissipative environment. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[3]  A. Leggett Quantum tunneling in the presence of an arbitrary linear dissipation mechanism , 1984 .

[4]  A. Leggett,et al.  Dynamics of the two-state system with ohmic dissipation , 1984 .

[5]  A. Leggett,et al.  Quantum tunnelling in a dissipative system , 1983 .

[6]  W. Bialek,et al.  Vibronically coupled two-level systems: Radiationless transitions in the slow regime , 1983 .

[7]  Edward M. Kosower,et al.  Intramolecular donor-acceptor systems. 9. Photophysics of (phenylamino)naphthalenesulfonates: a paradigm for excited-state intramolecular charge transfer , 1982 .

[8]  D. Devault Quantum mechanical tunnelling in biological systems , 1980, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[9]  L. D. Zusman Outer-sphere electron transfer in polar solvents , 1980 .

[10]  J. Hopfield,et al.  Theory of thermal and photoassisted electron tunneling , 1980 .

[11]  M. Simonius Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Blocking of Metastable States , 1978 .

[12]  N. Kampen,et al.  A soluble model for diffusion in a bistable potential , 1977 .

[13]  Joshua Jortner,et al.  Temperature dependent activation energy for electron transfer between biological molecules , 1976 .

[14]  L. Schiff,et al.  Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. , 1973 .

[15]  N. Hush,et al.  Homogeneous and heterogeneous optical and thermal electron transfer , 1968 .

[16]  Rudolph A. Marcus,et al.  On the Theory of Electron-Transfer Reactions. VI. Unified Treatment for Homogeneous and Electrode Reactions , 1965 .

[17]  R. Feynman,et al.  The Theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system , 1963 .

[18]  H. Kramers Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , 1940 .

[19]  H. Risken Fokker-Planck Equation , 1984 .

[20]  B. Chance Tunneling in biological systems , 1979 .

[21]  R. Feynman,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , 1965 .

[22]  A. Messiah Quantum Mechanics , 1961 .

[23]  S. Chandrasekhar Stochastic problems in Physics and Astronomy , 1943 .