Assessment of aesthetic quality and multiple functions of urban green space from the users’ perspective: The case of Hangzhou Flower Garden, China

Abstract This paper presents results of an attempt to evaluate aesthetic quality (visual, auditory, tactile and olfactory factors) of urban green space comprehensively, and assesses a proposed systematic simulation assessment approach for estimating near view scenic beauty. Quantitative holistic evaluation techniques were used. On-the-spot survey technique was employed by administering questionnaires to selected respondents who were also provided visual photo stimuli for evaluation. The photos were taken and presented to respondents in a defined and systematic way. The photo-based assessments gave no statistically significant difference ( P P

[1]  C.Y. Jim,et al.  Perception and Attitude of Residents Toward Urban Green Spaces in Guangzhou (China) , 2006, Environmental management.

[2]  P. Dearden FOCUS: LANDSCAPE AESTHETICS , 1985 .

[3]  E. Zube Cross-Disciplinary and Intermode Agreement On the Description and Evaluation of Landscape Resources , 1974 .

[4]  D. Canter,et al.  PICTURE OR PLACE? A MULTIPLE SORTING STUDY OF LANDSCAPE☆ , 1997 .

[5]  Richard Smardon,et al.  Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation , 1988 .

[6]  T. Terkenli Towards a theory of the landscape: the Aegean landscape as a cultural image , 2001 .

[7]  Louise M. Arthur,et al.  Scenic assessment: An overview , 1977 .

[8]  Gregory J. Buhyoff,et al.  Replication of a scenic preference function. , 1980 .

[9]  L. Jackson The relationship of urban design to human health and condition , 2003 .

[10]  K. Craik,et al.  The Development of Perceived Environmental Quality Indices , 1976 .

[11]  Gregory J. Buhyoff,et al.  Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. , 1978 .

[12]  Elwood L. Shafer,et al.  A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes , 1974 .

[13]  Y. Yasuoka,et al.  Assessing the impression of street‐side greenery , 1985 .

[14]  Ramessh Kumar,et al.  Understanding DSS value: an options perspective , 1999 .

[15]  S. Amir,et al.  Expert-based Method for the Evaluation of Visual Absorption Capacity of the Landscape* , 1990 .

[16]  Elwood L. Shafer,et al.  It seems possible to quantify scenic beauty in photographs , 1970 .

[17]  Assessment of landscape change by land evaluation of past and present situation , 1998 .

[18]  T. Daniel Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century , 2001 .

[19]  Philip Dearden,et al.  Public participation and scenic quality analysis , 1981 .

[20]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Effects of Sounds on Preferences for Outdoor Settings , 1983 .

[21]  T. Daniel,et al.  Measuring landscape esthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method , 1976 .

[22]  T. Daniel,et al.  Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics , 2002 .

[23]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Evaluating enclosure in urban sites , 2001 .

[24]  Gabriele Zanetto,et al.  The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation: The role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process , 2003 .

[25]  A framework linking urban park land use with pond water quality , 2000 .

[26]  Ervin H. Zube,et al.  Themes in Landscape Assessment Theory , 1984, Landscape Journal.

[27]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Comparison of Four Methods of Street Tree Assessment , 1993, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[28]  M. Arriaza,et al.  Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes , 2004 .

[29]  T. Brown,et al.  Predicting scenic beauty of timber stands , 1986 .

[30]  C.Y. Jim,et al.  Value of scenic views: Hedonic assessment of private housing in Hong Kong , 2009 .

[31]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[32]  Edward A. Cook,et al.  Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks , 2002 .

[33]  Ervin H. Zube,et al.  Perceiving Environmental Quality , 1976 .

[34]  Olaf Bastian,et al.  Landscape classification in Saxony (Germany) — a tool for holistic regional planning , 2000 .

[35]  A. Mayer The effect of limited options and policy interactions on water storage policy in south Florida. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology , 1997 .

[37]  Z. Naveh Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes , 2001 .

[38]  S. Marsh,et al.  Monitoring Forest Transitions Using Scanned Ground Photographs as a Primary Data Source , 2001 .

[39]  B. Salem Application of GIS to biodiversity monitoring , 2003 .

[40]  T. Daniel,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Assessment of Landscape Quality , 1983 .

[41]  Chi Yung Jim,et al.  Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China , 2006 .

[42]  W. Hale,et al.  Assessment of scenic beauty of the roadside vegetation in northern England , 2003 .

[43]  Andre Botequilha Leitão,et al.  Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning , 2002 .

[44]  S. Marsh,et al.  Spectral analysis for articulating scenic color changes in a coniferous landscape. , 1997 .