The Demographic Benefits of Diel Vertical Migration by Zooplankton

Three types of diel vertical migration behavior were expressed within a fjord population of the calanoid copepod Pseudocalanus newmani: (1) reverse migration (nocturnal descent), (2) normal migration (nocturnal ascent), and (3) no detectable migration. Reverse migration by P. newmani occurred in all three study years, but only at a deep (185 m) station at times of year when normally migrating predatory zooplankton (the copepod Euchaeta elongata, the chaetognath Sagitta elegans, and the omnivorous euphausiid Euphausia pacifica) were abundant. A predator—exclusion "natural experiment" tested the hypothesis that the reverse migration is a predator avoidance mechanism: at a shallow (55 m) station within the same fjord, large predatory zooplankton were absent or reduced markedly in abundance. In conditions of reduced nocturnal predation by predatory zooplankton, no reverse migration by P. newmani was detected on any of 11 cruises, consistent with the hypothesis. Instead, at the shallow station, where diurnal predation by planktivorous fish was of increased importance, normal diel vertical migration by P. newmani was observed on several occasions. No migration was detectable at either the deep station or the shallow station at times of year of low feeding activity of predators in surface waters. The predominant migration behavior (reverse, normal, or no migration) varied depending whether the primary source of mortality was predation by nocturnally feeding zooplankton or visually hunting planktivorous fish, and appeared unrelated to resource distributions or temperature gradients. The relative advantage of the three migration behaviors is explored with theoretical life table analyses. Re—examination of the demographic advantage hypothesis proposed by McLaren (1974) illustrates that vertical migration across a thermocline carries a fitness cost, not a benefit. The realized rate of increase of a migrant population of Pseudocalanus is found to be lower than a nonmigrant population for all combinations of surface temperatures, positive thermal stratification, and ratios of mortality for early and late developmental stages. However, avoidance of predators by vertical migrants reverses the outcome of this analysis. Predator avoidance by Pseudocalanus, accompanied by reduced mortality rates, confers a fitness advantage upon a population that migrates across a thermocline. Remarkably small reductions in mortality rates (as little as 12%) confer this advantage, whether migrants avoid nonvisually hunting predatory zooplankton by night or visually hunting planktivorous fish by day. The behavioral variation documented here confirms that diel vertical migration is dynamic rather than a fixed, invariant behavioral trait within a population. In environments where predation pressure and other factors vary through time, studies of limited scope and short duration are unlikely to illuminate the ultimate causes for diel vertical migration. The heritability of the vertical migration trait is unclear. The different phenotypic responses reflected within this single populations of P. newmani may reflect altered behavior of individuals. Alternatively, this behavioral variation may represent a balanced polymorphism maintained by differential mortality of genotypes experiencing selection pressures that vary through time.

[1]  B. Frost Variability and possible adaptive significance of diel vertical migration in Calanus pacificus, a planktonic marine copepod , 1988 .

[2]  J. T. Enright,et al.  Diurnal vertical migration: Adaptive significance and timing. Part 2. Test of the model: Details of timing1 , 1977 .

[3]  I. McLAREN Effects of Temperature on Growth of Zooplankton, and the Adaptive Value of Vertical Migration , 1963 .

[4]  W. Lampert,et al.  Predator evasion as an explanation of diurnal vertical migration by zooplankton , 1981, Nature.

[5]  R. W. Gilmer,et al.  The physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of a stratified, saline, sulfide lake in Palau1 , 1982 .

[6]  David W. Narver Diel Vertical Movements and Feeding of Underyearling Sockeye Salmon and the Limnetic Zooplankton in Babine Lake, British Columbia , 1970 .

[7]  K. King The life history and vertical distribution of the chaetognath, Sagitta elegans, in Dabob Bay, Washington , 1979 .

[8]  C. Williamson,et al.  Diel vertical migration in Mesocyclops edax: implications for predation rate estimates , 1982 .

[9]  D. Mackas,et al.  Fluorescence analysis of zooplankton gut contents and an investigation of diel feeding patterns , 1976 .

[10]  Application of an advective-diffusive equation to a water parcel observed in a fjord , 1975 .

[11]  L. Weider Spatial heterogeneity of Daphnia genotypes: Vertical migration and habitat partitioning' , 1984 .

[12]  R. Lough,et al.  Prey Field of Larval Herring Clupea harengus on a Continental Shelf Spawning Area , 1983 .

[13]  S. Bollens,et al.  Predator-induced diet vertical migration in a planktonic copepod , 1989 .

[14]  W. Lampert The adaptive significance of diel vertical migrations , 1989 .

[15]  J. Vidal Physioecology of zooplankton. I. Effects of phytoplankton concentration, temperature, and body size on the growth rate of Calanus pacificus and Pseudocalanus sp. , 1980 .

[16]  J. Yen Effects of prey concentration, prey size, predator life stage, predator starvation, and season on predation rates of the carnivorous copepod Euchaeta elongata , 1983 .

[17]  R. Bieri The Distribution of the Planktonic Chaetognatha in the Pacific and their Relationship to the Water Masses1 , 1959 .

[18]  M. Ohman,et al.  Size fractionation of phytoplankton as an estimate of food available to herbivores1 , 1982 .

[19]  Ohman,et al.  Omnivory by Euphausia pacifica: the role of copepod prey , 1984 .

[20]  B. K. Sullivan In situ feeding behavior of Sagitta elegans and Eukrohnia hamata (Chaetognatha) in relation to the vertical distribution and abundance of prey at Ocean Station “P”1 , 1980 .

[21]  J. Pijanowska,et al.  Effect of predation and resource depth distribution on vertical migration of zooplankton , 1988 .

[22]  C. Lorenzen,et al.  A method for the continuous measurement of in vivo chlorophyll concentration , 1966 .

[23]  I. McLAREN,et al.  The biology of Pseudocalanus. , 1979 .

[24]  R. Conover Zooplankton—Life in a Nutritionally Dilute Environment , 1968 .

[25]  A. Y. Fedorenko Instar and species-specific diets in two species of Chaoborus1 , 1975 .

[26]  M. Z. Gliwicz Predation and the evolution of vertical migration in zooplankton , 1986, Nature.

[27]  J. S. Suffern,et al.  Vertical migration in zooplankton as a predator avoidance mechanism1 , 1976 .

[28]  Edward Brinton,et al.  The distribution of Pacific euphausiids , 1962 .

[29]  M. Landry Population Dynamics and Production of a Planktonic Marine Copepod,. Acartia clausii, in a Small Temperate Lagoon on San Juan Island, Washington , 1978 .

[30]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Cyclic and Stable Populations: Plankton as Paradigm , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[31]  M. Reeve Comparative experimental studies on the feeding of chaetognaths and ctenophores , 1980 .

[32]  I. Bayly,et al.  Aspects of diel vertical migration in zooplankton, and its enigma variations , 1986 .

[33]  J. Haney Diel patterns of zooplankton behavior , 1988 .

[34]  T. Zaret Predation and freshwater communities , 1980 .

[35]  C. Clark,et al.  Diel Vertical Migrations by Juvenile Sockeye Salmon and the Antipredation Window , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[36]  D. Checkley Selective Feeding by Atlantic Herring (Clupea harengus) Larvae on Zooplankton in Natural Assemblages , 1982 .

[37]  Ramón Margalef Perspectives in Ecological Theory , 1968 .

[38]  I. Vuorinen Vertical migration of Eurytemora (Crustacea, Copepoda): a compromise between the risks of predation and decreased fecundity , 1987 .

[39]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology , 2019 .

[40]  J. T. Enright Diurnal vertical migration: Adaptive significance and timing. Part 1. Selective advantage: A metabolic model1 , 1977 .

[41]  R. Williams,et al.  Vertical distributions of eggs, nauplii and copepodites of Calanus helgolandicus (Copepoda: Crustacea) in the Celtic Sea , 1987 .

[42]  John H. Steele,et al.  A Simple Plankton Model , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[43]  H. Dumont A Competition-based Approach of the Reverse Vertical Migration in Zooplankton and its Implications, Chiefly Based on a Study of the Interactions of the Rotifer Asplanchna priodonta (Gosse) with Several Crustacea Entomostraca , 1972 .

[44]  E. R. Brooks,et al.  Effects of age and food availability on diel vertical migration of Calanus pacificus , 1982 .

[45]  T. Packard,et al.  Oxygen utilization and plankton metabolism in a Washington fjord , 1976 .

[46]  W. Gabriel,et al.  Vertical Migration of Zooplankton as an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[47]  C. Miller,et al.  Vertical habitat-partitioning by copepodites and adults of subtropical oceanic copepods , 1987 .

[48]  J. Koslow,et al.  FEEDING SELECTIVITY OF SCHOOLS OF NORTHERN ANCHOVY, ENGRAULIS MORDAX, IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT , 1981 .

[49]  M. Kamba Feeding habits and vertical distribution of walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma (Pallas), in early life stage in Uchiura Bay, Hokkaido. , 1977 .

[50]  L. Meester,et al.  Phototaxis in Daphnia: Interaction of hunger and genotype , 1989 .

[51]  D. F. Winter,et al.  A New Approach to the Computation of Tidal Motions in Estuaries , 1978 .

[52]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  A Treatise on Limnology Vol. II: Introduction to Lake Biology and the Limnoplankton , 1967 .