Disciplinary Differences in Academic Web Presence – A Statistical Study of the UK

The Web has become an important tool for scholars to publicise their activities and disseminate their findings. In the information age, those who do not use it risk being bypassed. In this paper we introduce a statistical technique to assess the extent to which the broad spectrum of research areas are visible online in UK universities. Five broad subject categories are used for research, and inlink counts are used as indicators of online visibility or impact. The approach is designed to give more complete subject coverage than previous studies and to avoid the conceptual difficulties of a page classification approach, although one is used for triangulation. The results suggest that Science and Engineering dominate university Web presences, but with Humanities and Arts also achieving a high presence relative to its size, showing that high Web impact does not have to be restricted to the sciences. Research funding bodies should now consider whether action needs to be taken to ensure that opportunities are not being missed in the lower Web impact areas.

[1]  Robert C. Vreeland.  Law Libraries in Hyperspace: A Citation Analysis of World Wide Web Sites , 2000 .

[2]  Liu Zhijing,et al.  Web mining research , 2003, Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications. ICCIMA 2003.

[3]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Scholarly Use of the Web: What Are the Key Inducers of Links to Journal Web Sites , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Rob Kling,et al.  Scholarly Communication and the Continuum of Electronic Publishing , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  What is this link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation , 2003, Inf. Res..

[6]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not Just a Matter of Time: Field Differences and the Shaping of Electronic Media , 1999 .

[7]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its web pages: An investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Monika Henzinger,et al.  Hyperlink Analysis for the Web , 2001, IEEE Internet Comput..

[9]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations.@@@Einstein and the Generations of Science. , 1976 .

[10]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Internet Use by Faculty Members in Various Disciplines: A Comparative Case Study , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Stephen P. Harter,et al.  Web-based analyses of E-journal impact: Approaches, problems, and issues , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Lennart Björneborn.  Small-world linkage and co-linkage , 2001, HYPERTEXT '01.

[13]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Motivations for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Edward J. Valauskas,et al.  Web Logs as Indices of Electronic Journal Use: Tools for Identifying a “Classic” Article , 2002 .

[15]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Conceptualizing documentation on the Web: An evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university Web sites , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  KlingRob,et al.  Not just a matter of time , 2000 .

[18]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Three target document range metrics for university web sites , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Richard E. Ferdig,et al.  Web and database network environments for educational supply and demand , 2002 .

[20]  Scientific.  International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED 1997 , 2003 .

[21]  Steven Furnell,et al.  A model for monitoring and migrating Web resources , 2003 .

[22]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[23]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Research dissemination and invocation on the Web , 2002, Online Inf. Rev..

[24]  Mark B. Schmidt,et al.  Explaining is Student and is Industry Differences in Perceptions of Skill Importance , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Susan Davis Herring.  Using the World Wide Web for research: are faculty satisfied? , 2001 .

[26]  Les Carr,et al.  Evidence of Hypertext in the scholarly archive , 2002, HYPERTEXT '02.

[27]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A web crawler design for data mining , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Self-citation and Self-reference: Credibility and Promotion in Academic Publication , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Sriram Raghavan,et al.  Searching the Web , 2001, ACM Trans. Internet Techn..

[30]  Peiling Wang,et al.  Mining longitudinal web queries: Trends and patterns , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Extracting macroscopic information from Web links , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Which academic subjects have most online impact? A pilot study and a new classification process , 2003, Online Inf. Rev..

[33]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Perspective of webometrics , 2004, Scientometrics.

[34]  Jonathan Adams.  Research Assessment in the UK , 2002, Science.

[35]  George A. Barnett,et al.  Hyperlink-affiliation network structure of top web sites: Examining affiliates with hyperlink in Korea , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  Alexander C. Halavais,et al.  Mapping networks of support for the Zapatista movement: Applying social network analysis to study contemporary social movements: Online activism in theory and practice , 2003 .

[37]  Gashaw Kebede,et al.  The changing information needs of users in electronic information environments , 2002, Electron. Libr..

[38]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The relationship between the links/Web Impact Factors of computer science departments in UK and thei , 2003 .

[39]  P. David Marshall,et al.  Web Theory , 2002 .

[40]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Evidence for the existence of geographic trends in university Web site interlinking , 2002, J. Documentation.

[41]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Disciplinary and linguistic considerations for academic Web linking: An exploratory hyperlink mediated study with Mainland China and Taiwan , 2003, Scientometrics.

[42]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Search engine coverage bias: evidence and possible causes , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[43]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[44]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The relationship between the WIFs or inlinks of Computer Science Departments in UK and their RAE ratings or research productivities in 2001 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[45]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Winners don't take all: Characterizing the competition for links on the web , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Mike Thelwall.  The top 100 linked-to pages on UK university web sites: high inlink counts are not usually associated with quality scholarly content , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[47]  Mike McConnell,et al.  Presenting a model for the structure and content of a university World Wide Web site , 1999, J. Inf. Sci..

[48]  R. Rousseau.  Sitations: an exploratory study , 1997 .

[49]  Karen S. Nantz,et al.  Faculty Course Use of the Internet , 2000, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Rob Kling,et al.  Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[51]  Hendrik Blockeel,et al.  Web mining research: a survey , 2000, SKDD.

[52]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Web Impact Factors for Australasian universities , 2002, Scientometrics.

[53]  Martin Oliver,et al.  "But my subject's different": a web-based approach to supporting disciplinary lifelong learning skills , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[54]  Ian McNay,et al.  Assessing the assessment: An analysis of the UK Research Assessment Exercise, 2001, and its outcomes, with special reference to research in education , 2003 .

[55]  M. Thelwall,et al.  U.S. academic departmental Web-site interlinking in the United States Disciplinary differences , 2003 .

[56]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Library and Information Science Schools in Canada and USA: A Webometric Perspective , 2002 .

[57]  Owen Thomas,et al.  Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[58]  Martin J. Rees.  Not worth the paper , 2002 .

[59]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to 'webometrics' , 1997, J. Documentation.

[60]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[61]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A fair history of the Web? Examining country balance in the Internet Archive , 2004 .

[62]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A comparison of sources of links for academic Web impact factor calculations , 2002, J. Documentation.

[63]  Alastair Smith,et al.  A Tale of Two Web Spaces: Comparing Sites Using Web Impact Factors. , 1999 .

[64]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The calculation of web impact factors , 1998, J. Documentation.

[65]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[66]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.