Lifetime memories from persistently supple synapses

It is here proposed that the evanescent network derived from malleable or supple synapses is the substrate for long‐lasting memory. The subjective sense of memory permanence is not derived, as suggested by Bain and others, from the stabilization of synaptic structure which gives rise to consolidated distributed networks. This generally held wisdom that synapses are activated and ultimately stabilized to reflect the long‐lasting substrate of memory is reinforced by increased interest in the importance of sparse coding in memory consolidation. One line of evidence for sparse coding derives from studies on the lateral nucleus neurons of the amygdala (for review, see Josselyn, 2010 ). These findings lead to the conclusion that a small number of neurons are both necessary and sufficient to retrieve the fear engram. Recently, it has been shown that sparse coding in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus is sufficient for retrieving the fear conditioning engram (Liu et al., 2012 ). One implication of these findings is that memory is stored in selected cells and that this restricted storage is more or less permanent, as the authors note: “… Defined cell populations can form the cellular basis for fear memory engrams (Liu et al., 2012 , p. 89).” But the problem with this model is that because new learning is incorporated into existing networks, stabilization would work against this integration. For this reason and because of obligatory processes of metabolic protein turnover and ongoing synaptic malleability, the “supple synapse” model is proposed (Routtenberg, A., Rekart, 2005; Routtenberg, 2008a , b ). Specifically, long‐lasting memory is derived from the instructive, use‐dependent sampling of neural networks selected from a very large universe of networks that are evanescent because they are linked together by supple synapses. Importantly, if such suppleness did not exist, the stabilization of synapses would then prevent the physiological malleability of brain circuitry that is essential both for proper integrated information storage and for flexible information retrieval. A corollary of this proposal is that it suggests an alternative view of consolidation: the same agent which is disruptive immediately after learning is no longer effective later because the network, over time, becomes widely distributed and evanescent. Thus, time‐dependence is replaced with space‐dependence. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Synaptic efficacy and EPSP summation in granule cells of rat fascia dentata studied in vitro. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  F. Crick Do dendritic spines twitch? , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  M. Gazzaniga Interview with Endel Tulving , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  E. Capaldi,et al.  The organization of behavior. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space. , 1993, Science.

[6]  S. Kauffman At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[7]  U. Frey,et al.  Synaptic tagging: implications for late maintenance of hippocampal long-term potentiation , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Environment-specific expression of the immediate-early gene Arc in hippocampal neuronal ensembles , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  J. D. McGaugh Memory--a century of consolidation. , 2000, Science.

[10]  A. Matus,et al.  Actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines. , 2000, Science.

[11]  E. Shimizu,et al.  NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic reinforcement as a crucial process for memory consolidation. , 2000, Science.

[12]  E. Kandel The Molecular Biology of Memory Storage: A Dialogue Between Genes and Synapses , 2001, Science.

[13]  R. Muller,et al.  Consolidation of Extinction Learning Involves Transfer from NMDA-Independent to NMDA-Dependent Memory , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Y. Dudai Molecular bases of long-term memories: a question of persistence , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Representations of odors in the rat orbitofrontal cortex change during and after learning. , 2002, Behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  Henry Markram,et al.  Real-Time Computing Without Stable States: A New Framework for Neural Computation Based on Perturbations , 2002, Neural Computation.

[17]  G. Edelman,et al.  Spike-timing dynamics of neuronal groups. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  E. Marder,et al.  Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  H. Eichenbaum Hippocampus Cognitive Processes and Neural Representations that Underlie Declarative Memory , 2004, Neuron.

[20]  J. Guzowski,et al.  Differences in Hippocampal Neuronal Population Responses to Modifications of an Environmental Context: Evidence for Distinct, Yet Complementary, Functions of CA3 and CA1 Ensembles , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  J. L. Rekart,et al.  Post-translational protein modification as the substrate for long-lasting memory , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  Karel Svoboda,et al.  Rapid Redistribution of Synaptic PSD-95 in the Neocortex In Vivo , 2006, PLoS biology.

[23]  J. Tsien,et al.  Molecular and systems mechanisms of memory consolidation and storage , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[24]  A. Routtenberg,et al.  Post‐translational synaptic protein modification as substrate for long‐lasting, remote memory: An initial test , 2007, Hippocampus.

[25]  Y. Dudai,et al.  Rapid Erasure of Long-Term Memory Associations in the Cortex by an Inhibitor of PKMζ , 2007, Science.

[26]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Constructive memory: The ghosts of past and future , 2007, Nature.

[27]  A. Routtenberg Long-lasting memory from evanescent networks. , 2008, European journal of pharmacology.

[28]  A. Routtenberg The substrate for long-lasting memory: If not protein synthesis, then what? , 2008, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[29]  W. Gan,et al.  Stably maintained dendritic spines are associated with lifelong memories , 2009, Nature.

[30]  Willie F. Tobin,et al.  Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories , 2009, Nature.

[31]  Matthew A. Wilson,et al.  Hippocampal Replay of Extended Experience , 2009, Neuron.

[32]  R. Morris,et al.  Making memories last: the synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  S. Josselyn Continuing the search for the engram: examining the mechanism of fear memories. , 2010, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN.

[34]  Edith Lesburguères,et al.  Early Tagging of Cortical Networks Is Required for the Formation of Enduring Associative Memory , 2011, Science.

[35]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Consolidation and Reconsolidation: Two Lives of Memories? , 2011, Neuron.

[36]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall , 2012, Nature.