Contractile actomyosin arcs promote the activation of primary mouse T cells in a ligand-dependent manner

Mechano-transduction is an emerging but still poorly understood component of T cell activation. Here we investigated the ligand-dependent contribution made by contractile actomyosin arcs populating the peripheral supramolecular activation cluster (pSMAC) region of the immunological synapse (IS) to T cell receptor (TCR) microcluster transport and proximal signaling in primary mouse T cells. Using super resolution microscopy, OT1-CD8+ mouse T cells, and two ovalbumin (OVA) peptides with different affinities for the TCR, we show that the generation of organized actomyosin arcs depends on ligand potency and the ability of myosin 2 to contract actin filaments. While weak ligands induce disorganized actomyosin arcs, strong ligands result in organized actomyosin arcs that correlate well with tension-sensitive CasL phosphorylation and the accumulation of ligands at the IS center. Blocking myosin 2 contractility greatly reduces the difference in the extent of Src and LAT phosphorylation observed between the strong and the weak ligand, arguing that myosin 2-dependent force generation within actin arcs contributes to ligand discrimination. Together, our data are consistent with the idea that actomyosin arcs in the pSMAC region of the IS promote a mechano-chemical feedback mechanism that amplifies the accumulation of critical signaling molecules at the IS.

[1]  A. Rubinstein Signaling , 2019, Hardness of Approximation Between P and NP.

[2]  E. Betzig,et al.  Formin-generated actomyosin arcs propel T cell receptor microcluster movement at the immune synapse , 2016, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  Katharina Gaus,et al.  Functional role of T-cell receptor nanoclusters in signal initiation and antigen discrimination , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Richard S Lewis,et al.  Calcium influx through CRAC channels controls actin organization and dynamics at the immune synapse , 2016, eLife.

[5]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Actin polymerization‐dependent activation of Cas‐L promotes immunological synapse stability , 2016, Immunology and cell biology.

[6]  M. Butte,et al.  T cell activation requires force generation , 2016, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  Yang Liu,et al.  DNA-based nanoparticle tension sensors reveal that T-cell receptors transmit defined pN forces to their antigens for enhanced fidelity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Burkhardt,et al.  Action and Traction: Cytoskeletal Control of Receptor Triggering at the Immunological Synapse , 2016, Front. Immunol..

[9]  C. Hivroz,et al.  Biophysical Aspects of T Lymphocyte Activation at the Immune Synapse , 2016, Front. Immunol..

[10]  Tai-De Li,et al.  Force Feedback Controls Motor Activity and Mechanical Properties of Self-Assembling Branched Actin Networks , 2016, Cell.

[11]  P. Allen,et al.  Force-Regulated In Situ TCR–Peptide-Bound MHC Class II Kinetics Determine Functions of CD4+ T Cells , 2015, The Journal of Immunology.

[12]  R. Varma,et al.  Supported Lipid Bilayer Technology for the Study of Cellular Interfaces , 2015, Current protocols in cell biology.

[13]  M. Davidson,et al.  Extended-resolution structured illumination imaging of endocytic and cytoskeletal dynamics , 2015, Science.

[14]  G. Hill,et al.  Imaging the immunological synapse between dendritic cells and T cells. , 2015, Journal of immunological methods.

[15]  D. Margulies,et al.  The cellular environment regulates in situ kinetics of T‐cell receptor interaction with peptide major histocompatibility complex , 2015, European journal of immunology.

[16]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  Actin Depletion Initiates Events Leading to Granule Secretion at the Immunological Synapse , 2015, Immunity.

[17]  C. Jun,et al.  TAGLN2 regulates T cell activation by stabilizing the actin cytoskeleton at the immunological synapse , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Molecular force spectroscopy on cells. , 2015, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[19]  A. Babich,et al.  F-actin flow drives affinity maturation and spatial organization of LFA-1 at the immunological synapse , 2015, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  D. Irvine,et al.  Actin foci facilitate activation of the phospholipase C-γ in primary T lymphocytes via the WASP pathway , 2015, eLife.

[21]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  Force-dependent transition in the T-cell receptor β-subunit allosterically regulates peptide discrimination and pMHC bond lifetime , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Force and affinity in ligand discrimination by the TCR. , 2014, Trends in immunology.

[23]  A. Málnási-Csizmadia,et al.  para-Nitroblebbistatin, the non-cytotoxic and photostable myosin II inhibitor. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[24]  B. Evavold,et al.  Accumulation of Serial Forces on TCR and CD8 Frequently Applied by Agonist Antigenic Peptides Embedded in MHC Molecules Triggers Calcium in T Cells , 2014, The Journal of Immunology.

[25]  E. Betzig,et al.  Nonmuscle Myosin II Isoforms Coassemble in Living Cells , 2014, Current Biology.

[26]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Accumulation of Dynamic Catch Bonds between TCR and Agonist Peptide-MHC Triggers T Cell Signaling , 2014, Cell.

[27]  Sudha Kumari,et al.  T cell antigen receptor activation and actin cytoskeleton remodeling. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  Arezki Boudaoud,et al.  FibrilTool, an ImageJ plug-in to quantify fibrillar structures in raw microscopy images , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[29]  Lance C Kam,et al.  CD28 and CD3 have complementary roles in T-cell traction forces , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  A. Babich,et al.  Coordinate control of cytoskeletal remodeling and calcium mobilization during T‐cell activation , 2013, Immunological reviews.

[31]  Geoff P. O’Donoghue,et al.  Direct single molecule measurement of TCR triggering by agonist pMHC in living primary T cells , 2013, eLife.

[32]  J. Hammer,et al.  Controversy and consensus regarding myosin II function at the immunological synapse. , 2013, Current opinion in immunology.

[33]  L. Kane Faculty Opinions recommendation of Distinct TCR signaling pathways drive proliferation and cytokine production in T cells. , 2013 .

[34]  Á. Enyedi,et al.  B cell receptor‐induced Ca2+ mobilization mediates F‐actin rearrangements and is indispensable for adhesion and spreading of B lymphocytes , 2013, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[35]  Matthew F Krummel,et al.  Integration of the movement of signaling microclusters with cellular motility in immunological synapses , 2012, Nature Immunology.

[36]  J. Cannons,et al.  Positive and negative signaling through SLAM receptors regulate synapse organization and thresholds of cytolysis. , 2012, Immunity.

[37]  Alexander Babich,et al.  F-actin polymerization and retrograde flow drive sustained PLCγ1 signaling during T cell activation , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  Wayne W. Hancock,et al.  Substrate Rigidity Regulates Human T Cell Activation and Proliferation , 2012, The Journal of Immunology.

[39]  J. Hammer,et al.  Actin retrograde flow and actomyosin II arc contraction drive receptor cluster dynamics at the immunological synapse in Jurkat T cells , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[40]  Nicole C. Fay,et al.  Myosin IIA Modulates T Cell Receptor Transport and CasL Phosphorylation during Early Immunological Synapse Formation , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Characterization of dynamic actin associations with T-cell receptor microclusters in primary T cells , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[42]  Sudha Kumari,et al.  Mechanosensing in T lymphocyte activation. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[43]  P. Doherty,et al.  Affinity Thresholds for Naive CD8+ CTL Activation by Peptides and Engineered Influenza A Viruses , 2011, The Journal of Immunology.

[44]  Cheng-han Yu,et al.  Altered Actin Centripetal Retrograde Flow in Physically Restricted Immunological Synapses , 2010, PloS one.

[45]  Mi-Hua Tao,et al.  Cutting Edge: Mechanical Forces Acting on T Cells Immobilized via the TCR Complex Can Trigger TCR Signaling , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[46]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  The kinetics of two dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T cell responsiveness , 2010, Nature.

[47]  R. Germain,et al.  Optimal germinal center responses require a multistage T cell:B cell adhesion process involving integrins, SLAM-associated protein, and CD84. , 2010, Immunity.

[48]  Evan W. Newell,et al.  TCR–peptide–MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity , 2010, Nature.

[49]  A. Tsun,et al.  The Strength of T Cell Receptor Signal Controls the Polarization of Cytotoxic Machinery to the Immunological Synapse , 2009, Immunity.

[50]  E. Reinherz,et al.  The αβ T Cell Receptor Is an Anisotropic Mechanosensor* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  Jay T. Groves,et al.  Cluster size regulates protein sorting in the immunological synapse , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  A. Bretscher,et al.  T cell antigen receptor signaling and immunological synapse stability require myosin IIA , 2009, Nature Immunology.

[53]  James R Faeder,et al.  Stochastic effects and bistability in T cell receptor signaling. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[54]  K. Mossman,et al.  T cell receptor microcluster transport through molecular mazes reveals mechanism of translocation. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[55]  Zhengyu Ma,et al.  Surface-Anchored Monomeric Agonist pMHCs Alone Trigger TCR with High Sensitivity , 2008, PLoS biology.

[56]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Mechanisms for segregating T cell receptor and adhesion molecules during immunological synapse formation in Jurkat T cells , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Jayajit Das,et al.  The stimulatory potency of T cell antigens is influenced by the formation of the immunological synapse. , 2007, Immunity.

[58]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Force Sensing by Mechanical Extension of the Src Family Kinase Substrate p130Cas , 2006, Cell.

[59]  T. Zal,et al.  Altered peptide ligands induce delayed CD8-T cell receptor interaction--a role for CD8 in distinguishing antigen quality. , 2006, Immunity.

[60]  Rajat Varma,et al.  T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. , 2006, Immunity.

[61]  A. Ortiz,et al.  A conformation- and avidity-based proofreading mechanism for the TCR-CD3 complex. , 2006, Trends in immunology.

[62]  Ronald N Germain,et al.  Modeling T Cell Antigen Discrimination Based on Feedback Control of Digital ERK Responses , 2005, PLoS biology.

[63]  F. Shibasaki,et al.  Calcium Signal-induced Cofilin Dephosphorylation Is Mediated by Slingshot via Calcineurin* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[64]  Morgan Huse,et al.  Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity , 2005, Nature.

[65]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  A single class II myosin modulates T cell motility and stopping, but not synapse formation , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[66]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[67]  S. Jameson,et al.  The impact of duration versus extent of TCR occupancy on T cell activation: a revision of the kinetic proofreading model. , 2001, Immunity.

[68]  C. Nelson,et al.  Structural and Functional Consequences of Altering a Peptide MHC Anchor Residue1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[69]  L. Samelson,et al.  Dynamic actin polymerization drives T cell receptor-induced spreading: a role for the signal transduction adaptor LAT. , 2001, Immunity.

[70]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[71]  S. Jameson,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands. , 1999, Immunity.

[72]  Colin R. F. Monks,et al.  Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells , 1998, Nature.

[73]  H. Eisen,et al.  Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response. , 1996, Immunity.

[74]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  C. Heldin,et al.  Dimerization of cell surface receptors in signal transduction , 1995, Cell.

[76]  Paul M. Allen,et al.  Partial T cell signaling: Altered phospho-ζ and lack of zap70 recruitment in APL-induced T cell anergy , 1994, Cell.

[77]  M. Mescher Surface contact requirements for activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[78]  T. Pollard,et al.  Formins filter modified actin subunits during processive elongation. , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[79]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[80]  T. Finkel,et al.  T cell receptor triggering by force. , 2010, Trends in immunology.

[81]  V. Barr,et al.  Dynamic molecular interactions linking the T cell antigen receptor to the actin cytoskeleton , 2005, Nature Immunology.