Changing face of stroke: implications for occupational therapy practice.

Stroke is one of the most life-altering syndromes affecting the world population. Rehabilitation for people experiencing stroke is focused almost exclusively on self-care activities and being able to return home and has little to no focus on work rehabilitation or community reintegration. The Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Group (CRRG) at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis was formed with the vision of improving everyday life for people after stroke by translating knowledge from neuroscience into treatment programs for productive living. Descriptive analysis of the intake assessment from the CRRG Clinical Core (N = 7,740) revealed three important findings: The age at stroke is decreasing, most strokes are neurologically mild to moderate in nature, and discharge placement decisions are being made largely on the basis of measures of impairment. The changes in the stroke population require occupational therapy to expand rehabilitation beyond the acute management of stroke to address full participation in work, family, and community life.

[1]  M. Carolyn Baum.  Participation: Its Relationship to Occupation and Health , 2003 .

[2]  C. A. Trombly,et al.  Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction , 1989 .

[3]  G. Chard.  International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2004 .

[4]  R L Hewer,et al.  Measuring Quality of Life in Stroke , 1993, Stroke.

[5]  B. Norrving,et al.  Costs of Stroke in Sweden A National Perspective , 1994, Stroke.

[6]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  K. Ekberg,et al.  Stroke patients' experiences of return to work , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  M. Law,et al.  Occupational therapy practice: focusing on occupational performance. , 1997, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[9]  Christine Eiser,et al.  Measuring quality of life , 1997, Archives of disease in childhood.

[10]  M. Bendz.  Rules of relevance after a stroke. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[11]  R. Teasell,et al.  Social issues in the rehabilitation of younger stroke patients. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  S. Johnston,et al.  Thirty-year projections for deaths from ischemic stroke in the United States. , 2003, Stroke.

[13]  J. Marler,et al.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. , 1989, Stroke.

[14]  E. Roth,et al.  The American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification: executive summary. , 1998, Circulation.

[15]  L. Koch,et al.  Returning to Work After the Onset of Illness , 2005 .

[16]  A study to evaluate the met and unmet needs of members belonging to Young Stroke groups affiliated with the Stroke Association , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[17]  A. Boonen,et al.  The international classification for functioning, disability and health , 2007, Clinical Rheumatology.

[18]  A. G. Fisher,et al.  Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. 1998 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[19]  H. Stuart.  Stigma and work. , 2004, HealthcarePapers.

[20]  Mona Bendz,et al.  The first year of rehabilitation after a stroke - from two perspectives. , 2003, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[21]  C. Trombly.  Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[22]  S. Saeki.  Disability management after stroke: its medical aspects for workplace accommodation , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.