Improving linear accelerator service response with a real-time electronic event reporting system.

To track linear accelerator performance issues, an online event recording system was developed in-house for use by therapists and physicists to log the details of technical problems arising on our institution's four linear accelerators. In use since October 2010, the system was designed so that all clinical physicists would receive email notification when an event was logged. Starting in October 2012, we initiated a pilot project in collaboration with our linear accelerator vendor to explore a new model of service and support, in which event notifications were also sent electronically directly to dedicated engineers at the vendor's technical help desk, who then initiated a response to technical issues. Previously, technical issues were reported by telephone to the vendor's call center, which then disseminated information and coordinated a response with the Technical Support help desk and local service engineers. The purpose of this work was to investigate the improvements to clinical operations resulting from this new service model. The new and old service models were quantitatively compared by reviewing event logs and the oncology information system database in the nine months prior to and after initiation of the project. Here, we focus on events that resulted in an inoperative linear accelerator ("down" machine). Machine downtime, vendor response time, treatment cancellations, and event resolution were evaluated and compared over two equivalent time periods. In 389 clinical days, there were 119 machine-down events: 59 events before and 60 after introduction of the new model. In the new model, median time to service response decreased from 45 to 8 min, service engineer dispatch time decreased 44%, downtime per event decreased from 45 to 20 min, and treatment cancellations decreased 68%. The decreased vendor response time and reduced number of on-site visits by a service engineer resulted in decreased downtime and decreased patient treatment cancellations. PACS numbers: 87.56.bd, 87.55.Qr.

[1]  Peter A S Johnstone,et al.  The electronification of the radiation oncology treatment cycle: the promises and pitfalls of a digital department. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[2]  James F Dempsey,et al.  Web-based submission, archive, and review of radiotherapy data for clinical quality assurance: a new paradigm. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  F. Rath Tools for developing a quality management program: proactive tools (process mapping, value stream mapping, fault tree analysis, and failure mode and effects analysis). , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Nabil Adnani,et al.  Design and clinical implementation of a TG‐106 compliant linear accelerator data management system and MU calculator , 2010, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[5]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  Quality in radiation oncology. , 2007, Medical physics.

[6]  D Thwaites,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy , 1995 .

[7]  Sridhar Yaddanapudi,et al.  Technical note: electronic chart checks in a paperless radiation therapy clinic. , 2012, Medical physics.

[8]  N. Spry,et al.  Detailed review and analysis of complex radiotherapy clinical trial planning data: evaluation and initial experience with the SWAN software system. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  D. Parda,et al.  A Radiation Oncology Based Electronic Health Record in an Integrated Radiation Oncology Network , 2011, Journal of Radiation Oncology Informatics.

[10]  L. Potters,et al.  Six sigma tools for a patient safety-oriented, quality-checklist driven radiation medicine department. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[11]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. , 2009, Medical physics.

[12]  J. Palta,et al.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. , 1994, Medical physics.

[13]  Martin-Immanuel Bittner Information Technology in Radiation Oncology – A Brave New World? , 2013, Front. Oncol..

[14]  E E Klein,et al.  A quality assurance program for ancillary high technology devices on a dual-energy accelerator. , 1996, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  Tommy Knöös,et al.  Radiation Oncology Safety Information System (ROSIS)--profiles of participants and the first 1074 incident reports. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  C. J. Karzmark,et al.  Advances in linear accelerator design for radiotherapy. , 1984, Medical physics.

[17]  Peter Balter,et al.  Information technology resource management in radiation oncology * , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.