Evaluation of ECG algorithms designed to improve detect of transient myocardial ischemia to minimize false alarms in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND Patients hospitalized for suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at risk for transient myocardial ischemia. During the "rule-out" phase, continuous ECG ST-segment monitoring can identify transient myocardial ischemia, even when asymptomatic. However, current ST-segment monitoring software is vastly underutilized due to false positive alarms, with resultant alarm fatigue. Current ST algorithms may contribute to alarm fatigue because; (1) they are not designed with a delay (minutes), rather alarm to brief spikes (i.e., turning, heart rate changes), and (2) alarm to changes in a single ECG lead, rather than contiguous leads. PURPOSE This study was designed to determine sensitivity, and specificity, of ST algorithms when accounting for; ST magnitude (100μV vs 200μV), duration, and changes in contiguous ECG leads (i.e., aVL, I, - aVR, II, aVF, III; V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, V6, V6, I). METHODS This was a secondary analysis from the COMPARE Study, which assessed occurrence rates for transient myocardial ischemia in hospitalized patients with suspected ACS using 12-lead Holter. Transient myocardial ischemia was identified from Holter using >100μV ST-segment ↑ or ↓, in >1 ECG lead, >1min. Algorithms tested against Holter transient myocardial ischemia were done using the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) ECG algorithm and included: (1)100μV vs 200μV any lead during a 5-min ST average; (2)100μV vs 200μV any lead >5min, (3) 100μV vs 200μV any lead during a 5-min ST average in contiguous leads, and (4) 100μV vs 200μV>5min in contiguous leads (Table below). RESULTS In 361 patients; mean age 63+12years, 63% male, 56% prior CAD, 43 (11%) had transient myocardial ischemia. Of the 43 patients with transient myocardial ischemia, 17 (40%) had ST-segment elevation events, and 26 (60%) ST-segment depression events. A higher proportion of patients with ST segment depression has missed ischemic events. Table shows sensitivity and specificity for the four algorithms tested. CONCLUSIONS Sensitivity was highly variable, due to the ST threshold selected, with the 100μV measurement point being superior to the 200μV amplitude threshold. Of all the algorithms tested, there was moderate sensitivity and specificity (70% and 68%) using the 100μV ST-segment threshold, integrated ST-segment changes in contiguous leads during a 5-min average.

[1]  A. Jaffe,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[2]  R. Gregg,et al.  Intelligent use of advanced capabilities of diagnostic ECG algorithms in a monitoring environment. , 2017, Journal of electrocardiology.

[3]  B. Drew,et al.  Insights into the Problem of Alarm Fatigue with Physiologic Monitor Devices: A Comprehensive Observational Study of Consecutive Intensive Care Unit Patients , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  M. Souter,et al.  Equipment-related Electrocardiographic Artifacts: Causes, Characteristics, Consequences, and Correction , 2008, Anesthesiology.

[5]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2015 .

[6]  Charalampos Tsimenidis,et al.  False alarms during patient monitoring in clinical intensive care units are highly related to poor quality of the monitored electrocardiogram signals , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[7]  M. Schull,et al.  ALaRMED: adverse events in low-risk chest pain patients receiving continuous ECG monitoring in the emergency department: a survey of Canadian emergency physicians. , 2008, CJEM.

[8]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Among Unstable Angina and Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients, Transient Myocardial Ischemia and Early Invasive Treatment Are Predictors of Major In-hospital Complications , 2016, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[9]  Heini Huhtala,et al.  Comparative accuracy of manual versus computerized electrocardiographic measurement of J-, ST- and T-wave deviations in patients with acute coronary syndrome. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  Vladimir Shusterman,et al.  Dynamic tracking of ischemia in the surface electrocardiogram. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.

[11]  B. Drew,et al.  Frequency, duration, magnitude, and consequences of myocardial ischemia during intracoronary ultrasonography. , 1997, American heart journal.

[12]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[13]  M. Pelter,et al.  A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[14]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Unplanned transfer from the telemetry unit to the intensive care unit in hospitalized patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. , 2016, Journal of electrocardiology.

[15]  J. Alpert,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the North American Society for P , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  B. Drew,et al.  Frequency, characteristics, and clinical significance of transient ST segment elevation in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2002, European heart journal.

[17]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Signal Quality Analysis of Ambulatory Electrocardiograms to Gate False Myocardial Ischemia Alarms , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  A. Yan,et al.  Long-term prognostic value and therapeutic implications of continuous ST-segment monitoring in acute coronary syndrome. , 2007, American heart journal.

[19]  R. Califf,et al.  Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young , 2004, Circulation.

[20]  G. Wagner,et al.  Validation of improved vessel-specific leads (VSLs) for detecting acute myocardial ischemia. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[21]  S. Sendelbach,et al.  National survey of cardiologists' standard of practice for continuous ST-segment monitoring. , 2010, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[22]  C. Aguiar,et al.  Does Continuous ST‐Segment Monitoring Add Prognostic Information to the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE Risk Scores? , 2011, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[23]  B. Drew,et al.  Computer versus manual measurement of ST-segment deviation. , 1997, Journal of electrocardiology.