Misinformation and memory: the creation of new memories.

Misleading information presented after an event can lead people to erroneous reports of that misinformation. Different process histories can be responsible for the same erroneous report in different people. We argue that the relative proportion of times that the different process histories are responsible for erroneous reporting will depend on the conditions of acquisition, retention, and retrieval of information. Given the conditions typical of most misinformation experiments, it appears that misinformation acceptance plays a major role, memory impairment plays some role, and pure guessing plays little or no role. Moreover, we argue that misinformation acceptance has not received the appreciation that it deserves as a phenomenon worthy of our sustained investigation. It may not tell us anything about impairment of memories, but it does tell us something about the creation of new memories.

[1]  R. Hammersley,et al.  What is integration? Remembering a story and remembering false implications about the story , 1986 .

[2]  G. Davies,et al.  Memory in context : context in memory , 1990 .

[3]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Hypnosis and interrogative suggestibility , 1988 .

[4]  R A Chechile,et al.  Trace susceptibility theory. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  P. Sheehan,et al.  The consistency of occurrences of memory distortion following hypnotic induction. , 1986, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[6]  E F Loftus,et al.  Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[7]  C. Brockmann,et al.  Unspecific postevent information, attribution of responsibility, and eyewitness performance , 1987 .

[8]  A. W. Melton,et al.  The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. By Arthur W. Melton, Jean McQueen Irwin, 1940. , 1940, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Misleading postevent information and memory for events: arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  A Reconciliation of the Evidence on Eyewitness Testimony: Comments on McCloskey and Zaragoza , 1989 .

[11]  E. Loftus.  Shifting human color memory , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[13]  The effect of leading questions on prior memory: evidence for the coexistence of inconsistent memory traces , 1984 .

[14]  J. Morton,et al.  Headed records: A model for memory and its failures , 1985, Cognition.

[15]  L. Squire.  CHAPTER 7 – Memory and the Brain* , 1986 .

[16]  E F Loftus,et al.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[17]  Elizabeth F Loftus,et al.  Leading questions and the eyewitness report , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Phoebe C. Ellsworth,et al.  The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise. , 1987 .

[19]  E F Loftus,et al.  Qualities of the unreal. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  N. Kroll,et al.  Misleading questions and the retrieval of the irretrievable , 1986 .

[21]  Michael P. Toglia,et al.  On remembering… more or less: A trace strength interpretation of developmental differences in suggestibility. , 1988 .

[22]  G. Gudjonsson.  The relationship between interrogative suggestibility and acquiescence: Empirical findings and theoretical implications , 1986 .

[23]  B. Underwood,et al.  Fate of first-list associations in transfer theory. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Reality Monitoring and Suggestibility: Children’s Ability to Discriminate Among Memories From Different Sources , 1987 .

[25]  V. Reyna,et al.  Memory loci of suggestibility development: Comment on Ceci, Ross, and Toglia (1987). , 1988 .

[26]  M. Zaragoza,et al.  Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[28]  K. Ogawa.  Retrieval of the irretrievable: The effect of sequential information on response bias , 1988 .

[29]  E. Loftus,et al.  Troubles with memory , 1987 .

[30]  S. Ceci,et al.  Suggestibility of children's memory: Psycholegal implications. , 1987 .

[31]  G. Davies,et al.  Reinstatement of context following exposure to post-event information. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[32]  C. C. Chandler.  Specific retroactive interference in modified recognition tests: Evidence for an unknown cause of interference. , 1989 .

[33]  R. Belli,et al.  Influences of misleading postevent information: misinformation interference and acceptance. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  S. Ceci,et al.  Age Differences in Suggestibility: Narrowing the Uncertainties , 1987 .

[35]  Willem A. Wagenaar,et al.  Misleading postevent information: Testing parameterized models of integration in memory , 1987 .