Progressive Demand Control of Thermostatically Controlled Appliances for Power System Frequency Regulation

The high penetration of large-scale renewable generations challenges the stability of power systems. It is likely to causes frequency fluctuations due to the intermittent nature. Demand Response (DR) has received much attention because it balances generation and demand with flexibility. Unlike the costly conventional spinning reserve, thermostatically controlled load (TCL) can be controlled to provide frequency regulation service with little impact on customer comfort. A progressive demand control strategy is proposed in this paper for the system frequency regulation. In particular, the state shift priority method is proposed to optimally control loads without compromising customer comfort. The operation-cycle based random recovery method is developed to mitigate the load rebound. Case studies are conducted to validate that TCLs can provide a fast and smooth frequency regulation via the proposed control strategy.

[1]  Ning Lu,et al.  Cooling Devices in Demand Response: A Comparison of Control Methods , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  Fangxing Li,et al.  Progressive time-differentiated peak pricing (PTPP) for aggregated air-conditioning load in demand response programs , 2018, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems.

[3]  Sean P. Meyn,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Frequency Regulation From Commercial Building HVAC Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Real Time Operation of Smart Grids via FCN Networks and Optimal Power Flow , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[5]  Fangxing Li,et al.  Analytical Method to Aggregate Multi-Machine SFR Model With Applications in Power System Dynamic Studies , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Ibraheem,et al.  Recent philosophies of automatic generation control strategies in power systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  C. Batlle,et al.  Impacts of Intermittent Renewables on Electricity Generation System Operation , 2012 .

[8]  Gerard Ledwich,et al.  Demand Response for Residential Appliances via Customer Reward Scheme , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  Jinghan He,et al.  Hierarchical Control of Residential HVAC Units for Primary Frequency Regulation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[10]  Palle Andersen,et al.  Primary Control by ON/OFF Demand-Side Devices , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  Nick Jenkins,et al.  Investigation of Domestic Load Control to Provide Primary Frequency Response Using Smart Meters , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Arindam Ghosh,et al.  Renewable energy sources and frequency regulation : survey and new perspectives , 2010 .

[13]  Yilu Liu,et al.  A hybrid dynamic demand control strategy for power system frequency regulation , 2017 .

[14]  Yi Ding,et al.  Evaluation and Sequential Dispatch of Operating Reserve Provided by Air Conditioners Considering Lead–Lag Rebound Effect , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Babu Narayanan,et al.  POWER SYSTEM STABILITY AND CONTROL , 2015 .

[16]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Decentralized Control of Thermostatic Loads for Flexible Demand Response , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[17]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  An Efficient Decomposition Method for the Integrated Dispatch of Generation and Load , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Zhiwei Wang,et al.  Dynamic demand control for system frequency regulation: Concept review, algorithm comparison, and future vision , 2018 .

[19]  François Bouffard,et al.  Decentralized Demand-Side Contribution to Primary Frequency Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.