Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of acute unstable syndesmotic injuries.

BACKGROUND Acute unstable syndesmotic ankle injuries are treated primarily by reduction and stabilization with a syndesmotic screw. Examination with fluoroscopy or standard radiographs may not provide reliable information about the quality of the reduction. There is evidence that intraoperative three-dimensional imaging can demonstrate a large proportion of malreductions. The aim of this study was to determine whether intraoperative three-dimensional imaging improves the detection of inadequate positioning of the distal aspect of the fibula in the tibiofibular incisura after syndesmotic screw insertion compared with the findings on standard intraoperative fluoroscopy. METHODS Of 2286 ankle fractures treated operatively from August 2001 to February 2011, 251 consecutive cases (11%) were identified in a retrospective chart review. All had an unstable syndesmosis and underwent syndesmosis stabilization on the basis of an intraoperative hook test. After fluoroscopy, an intraoperative three-dimensional scan was performed. The result of this scan was documented by the surgeon and analyzed retrospectively with regard to the incidence and nature of the need for intraoperative revisions. RESULTS The intraoperative three-dimensional scan altered the surgical outcome in eighty-two ankles (32.7%). In most ankles (seventy-seven; 30.7%), the reduction was improved, with the most common improvement being the alignment of the fibula in the tibiofibular incisura in sixty-four patients (25.5%) followed by correction of the fracture reduction in thirteen patients (5.2%). The other five alterations involved implant corrections. The most common malpositions requiring correction after insertion of a positioning screw, with or without additional fixation, were anterior displacement and internal rotation of the distal aspect of the fibula. CONCLUSIONS Following open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle fracture, the correct position of the syndesmosis cannot be evaluated reliably with use of conventional radiographs or intraoperative fluoroscopy. In view of the high proportion of positive findings in this study, we believe that any treatment of a syndesmotic injury should include intraoperative three-dimensional imaging or at least a postoperative computed tomography scan.

[1]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Computed tomography of normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis , 2010, Skeletal Radiology.

[2]  Christopher F. Hyer,et al.  Transosseous fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: comparison of an interosseous suture and endobutton to traditional screw fixation in 50 cases. , 2009, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[3]  Musa Citak,et al.  Intraoperative 3D imaging: value and consequences in 248 cases. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Three-dimensional volume rendering of tibiofibular joint space and quantitative analysis of change in volume due to tibiofibular syndesmosis diastases , 2006, Skeletal Radiology.

[5]  J. Bonnin Die Verletzungen des oberen Sprunggelenkes , 1973 .

[6]  C. Tieszer,et al.  Functional and Radiographic Results of Patients with Syndesmotic Screw Fixation: Implications for Screw Removal , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[7]  S. L. Jensen,et al.  Epidemiology of ankle fractures , 1998 .

[8]  M. Ochi,et al.  Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  Jike Lu,et al.  The Fibular Incisure of the Tibia on CT Scan: A Cadaver Study , 1998, Foot & ankle international.

[10]  R. Jinnah,et al.  Tibiotalar contact and fibular malunion in ankle fractures. A cadaver study. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  M. Bosse,et al.  Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  T. Keller,et al.  A Radiographic Evaluation of the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis , 1989, Foot & ankle.

[13]  Jike Lu,et al.  Radiographic and CT Evaluation of Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Diastasis: A Cadaver Study , 1997, Foot & ankle international.

[14]  A. Greenspan,et al.  Orthopedic Imaging: A Practical Approach , 1988 .

[15]  A Ekkernkamp,et al.  [The clinical use of the ISO-C(3D) imaging system in calcaneus fracture surgery]. , 2006, Der Unfallchirurg.

[16]  S. Trevino,et al.  The Effects of Rotation on Radiographic Evaluation of the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[17]  Christopher F. Hyer,et al.  Treatment of Syndesmotic Disruptions with the Arthrex Tightrope™: A Report of 25 Cases , 2008, Foot & ankle international.

[18]  R. Jenkinson,et al.  Intraoperative Diagnosis of Syndesmosis Injuries in External Rotation Ankle Fractures , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[19]  R. Kaye Stabilization of Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries With a Syndesmosis Screw , 1989, Foot & ankle.

[20]  E. Olson,et al.  The tibiofibular syndesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Syndesmotic Disruption in Low Fibular Fractures Associated With Deltoid Ligament Injury , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  A. Biçimoğlu,et al.  Magnetic resonance arthrographic evaluation of syndesmotic diastasis in ankle fractures , 2005, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[23]  R. Roberts Surgical treatment of displaced ankle fractures. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  K. Koval,et al.  Outcome after Unstable Ankle Fracture: Effect of Syndesmotic Stabilization , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[25]  P. Ramsey,et al.  Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  M. Harper Reconstruction of malunited fractures of the lateral malleolus. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  P. Mulder,et al.  Radiographic Measurement of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Has Limited Use , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  L. Melton,et al.  Epidemiology of ankle fractures in Rochester, Minnesota. , 1987, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[29]  H. Chissell,et al.  The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  Christian Krettek,et al.  Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging With a Motorized Mobile C-Arm (SIREMOBIL ISO-C-3D) in Foot and Ankle Trauma Care: A Preliminary Report , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[31]  Martinus Richter,et al.  Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Imaging in Foot and Ankle Trauma-Experience With a Second-Generation Device (ARCADIS-3D) , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[32]  Ekkehard Euler,et al.  3D imaging with an isocentric mobile C-arm , 2004, European Radiology.

[33]  M Liebergall,et al.  The use of intraoperative three-dimensional imaging (ISO-C-3D) in fixation of intraarticular fractures. , 2007, Injury.

[34]  Musa Citak,et al.  Intraoperative 3D imaging in calcaneal fracture care-clinical implications and decision making. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[35]  A. Beumer,et al.  The influence of ankle positioning on the radiography of the distal tibial tubercles , 2003, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[36]  J. Madsen,et al.  No Difference in Functional and Radiographic Results 8.4 Years After Quadricortical Compared With Tricortical Syndesmosis Fixation in Ankle Fractures , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[37]  D. Staykov,et al.  Evaluation of the ankle syndesmosis: A plastination slices study , 2004, Clinical anatomy.

[38]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Predictors of Functional Outcome Following Transsyndesmotic Screw Fixation of Ankle Fractures , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[39]  M. Harper Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[40]  A. Toledano,et al.  Observer Reliability in Ankle Radiographic Measurements , 1997, Foot & ankle international.