Post-occupancy Evaluation and Thermal Comfort: State of the Art and New Approaches

Abstract Building occupants are a valuable source of information on building performance as well as indoor environmental quality and their effects on comfort and productivity. A large number of different studies have been carried out over recent decades focusing on various aspects of the broad field of comfort, well-being and health at workplaces. Two main methodical approaches can be identified analysing the history of comfort research: laboratory tests in climate chambers, and field tests in running buildings. Advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are pointed out in this paper and some of the most well-known studies from Europe and the US are described with respect to their specific objectives and methodologies. No difference is made between pure comfort field studies and more general post-occupancy evaluations because the borderline is vague in most cases and the purpose of this paper is to collect as much useful information as possible on comfort research methods. A current study on overall comfort at workplaces introduces a new multivariate approach, including building-related and further contextual parameters.

[1]  P. Fanger,et al.  The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. , 2000, Indoor air.

[2]  Ian Cooper,et al.  Post-occupancy evaluation - where are you? , 2001 .

[3]  Gail Brager,et al.  Historical and Cultural Influences on Comfort Expectations , 2008 .

[4]  E. de Oliveira Fernandes,et al.  Perceived health and comfort in relation to energy use and building characteristics , 2006 .

[5]  M. A. Humphreys,et al.  Field Studies and climate chamber experiments in thermal comfort research , 1994 .

[6]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  Thermal comfort as part of a self-regulating system , 1973 .

[7]  E. Shove,et al.  Debating the future of comfort: environmental sustainability, energy consumption and the indoor environment , 2005 .

[8]  K. Steemers,et al.  Thermal comfort and psychological adaptation as a guide for designing urban spaces , 2003 .

[9]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[10]  L. Berglund,et al.  A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment , 1986 .

[11]  Gail Brager,et al.  Operable windows, personal control and occupant comfort. , 2004 .

[12]  R. de Dear,et al.  Adaptive temperature limits: A new guideline in The Netherlands: A new approach for the assessment of building performance with respect to thermal indoor climate☆ , 2006 .

[13]  Jørn Toftum,et al.  New indoor environment chambers and field experiment offices for research on human comfort, health and productivity at moderate energy expenditure , 2004 .

[14]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[15]  Karsten Voss,et al.  Bürogebäude mit Zukunft - Konzepte, Analysen, Erfahrungen Solarpraxis , 2005 .

[16]  Philomena Bluyssen,et al.  Multicriteria analysis of health, comfort and energy efficiency in buildings , 2005 .

[17]  David Lehrer,et al.  Listening to the occupants: a Web-based indoor environmental quality survey. , 2004, Indoor air.

[18]  Povl Ole Fanger,et al.  The effect of a personalized ventilation system on perceived air quality and SBS symptoms , 2002 .

[19]  Mark J. Mendell,et al.  Non‐Specific Symptoms In Office Workers: A Review And Summary Of The Epidemiologic Literature , 1993 .

[20]  R de Dear Thermal comfort in practice. , 2004, Indoor air.

[21]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  Quantifying occupant comfort: are combined indices of the indoor environment practicable? , 2005 .

[22]  Ian Cooper,et al.  Comfort theory and practice: Barriers to the conservation of energy by building occupants , 1982 .

[23]  R. Dear,et al.  Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review , 1998 .

[24]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  Developing an adaptive control algorithm for Europe , 2002 .

[25]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portfolio of feedback techniques , 2005 .

[26]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT AND SUSTAINABLE THERMAL STANDARDS FOR BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[27]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 4: the Probe occupant surveys and their implications , 2001 .

[28]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Productivity in buildings: the ‘killer’ variables , 1999 .

[29]  Fergus Nicol,et al.  Post-occupancy evaluation and field studies of thermal comfort , 2005 .

[30]  Jan Sundell,et al.  Psychosocial Factors and the “Sick Building-Syndrome”. A case-referent study , 1996 .

[31]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .