Improving the image quality of contrast-enhanced MR angiography by automated image registration: a prospective study in peripheral arterial disease of the lower extremities.

OBJECTIVE If a patient has moved during digital subtraction angiography (DSA), manual pixel shift can improve the image quality. This study investigated whether such image registration can also improve the quality of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in patients with peripheral arterial disease of the lower extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS 404 leg MRAs of patients likely to have peripheral artery disease were included in this prospective study. The standard non-registered MRAs were compared to automatically linear, affine and warp registered MRAs by four image quality parameters, including the vessel detection probability (VDP) in maximum intensity projection (MIP) images and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). The different registration types were compared by analysis of variance. RESULTS All studied image quality parameters showed similar trends. Generally, registration improved the leg MRA quality significantly (P<0.05). The 12% of lower legs with a body shift of 1 mm or more showed the highest gain in image quality when using linear registration instead of no registration, with an average VDP gain of 20-49%. Warp registration improved the image quality slightly further. CONCLUSION Automated image registration can improve the MRA image quality especially in the lower legs, which is comparable to the effect of pixel shift in DSA.

[1]  E. Klotz,et al.  Cervical CT Angiography Comparing Routine Noncontrast and a Late Venous Scan as Masks for Automated Bone Subtraction: Feasibility Study and Examination of the Influence of Patient Motion on Image Quality , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Rodney A. White,et al.  ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography , 2006, Circulation.

[3]  W. Hopfenmüller,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the influence of different table feeds on visualization of peripheral arteries in CT angiography of aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries , 2008, European Radiology.

[4]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  J W Sayre,et al.  Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography: Evaluation of Two Different Fully Automated Image-Registration Procedures for Interscan Motion Compensation , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[6]  横井 良明,et al.  ガイドライン解説 ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Diseaseから 腎動脈狭窄症のガイドラインについて , 2009 .

[7]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  Jan Menke,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in carotid artery disease: does automated image registration improve image quality? , 2009, European Radiology.

[9]  Assessment of the abdominal aorta and its visceral branches by contrast-enhanced dynamic volumetric hepatic parallel magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility, reliability and accuracy , 2007, European Radiology.

[10]  Need for background suppression in contrast‐enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  A. Stadler,et al.  Multidetector CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses , 2008, European Radiology.

[12]  C. White,et al.  Clinical practice. Intermittent claudication. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Clinical evaluation of bone-subtraction CT angiography (BSCTA) in head and neck imaging , 2006 .

[14]  P. Schnyder,et al.  Assessment of occlusive arterial disease of abdominal aorta and lower extremities arteries: value of multidetector CT angiography using an adaptive acquisition method , 2008, European Radiology.

[15]  Yi Sun,et al.  Performance analysis of maximum intensity projection algorithm for display of MRA images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  G. Adam,et al.  Coronary vessel-wall and lumen imaging using radial k-space acquisition with MRI at 3 Tesla , 2007, European Radiology.

[17]  C. Laine,et al.  In the clinic. Peripheral arterial disease. , 2007, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration , 1993 .

[19]  W. Bautz,et al.  Clinical evaluation of bone-subtraction CT angiography (BSCTA) in head and neck imaging , 2006, European Radiology.

[20]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative characterization of vascularization and hemodynamics in head and neck tumors with a 3D magnetic resonance time-resolved echo-shared angiographic technique (TREAT)—initial results , 2007, European Radiology.

[21]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Nonrigid registration for subtraction CT angiography applied to the carotids and cranial arteries. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[22]  Jan Menke,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in peripheral arterial disease: Improving image quality by automated image registration , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  A. Krishnan,et al.  Application and assessment of a robust elastic motion correction algorithm to dynamic MRI , 2006, European Radiology.