In situ bioassay chambers and procedures for assessment of sediment toxicity with Chironomus riparius.

The purpose of this study was to develop an in situ sediment bioassay chamber and respective procedures, suitable for performing toxicity bioassays with benthic invertebrates, using the midge Chironomus riparius. It was also our objective to compare the responses obtained under controlled conditions (laboratory 10-day larval growth and survival test) with those obtained in situ. Clean sand and a formulated sediment were incorporated in the in situ bioassay, along with local sediments, as a way of minimizing natural variability due to physicochemical differences among sediments or due to interactions with indigenous organisms. Recovery of organisms was good (80-100% in the control and reference site), indicating that the developed chamber and protocol were suitable for exposing and retrieving C. riparius in situ. Results also showed differences between responses obtained with formulated and natural sediment in situ, as well as between laboratory and in situ.

[1]  Donald S. Cherry,et al.  Laboratory to field validation in an integrative assessment of an acid mine drainage–impacted watershed , 2000 .

[2]  R. Ribeiro,et al.  Test chambers and test procedures for in situ toxicity testing with zooplankton , 1999 .

[3]  J. Giesy,et al.  Freshwater Sediment Toxicity Bioassessment: Rationale for Species Selection and Test Design , 1989 .

[4]  D. Jeffrey,et al.  Bioindicators and environmental management , 1991 .

[5]  Ralf Schulz,et al.  Validity and ecological relevance of an active in situ bioassay using gammarus pulex and limnephilus lunatus , 1999, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[6]  D. Chappie,et al.  Optimization of in situ bioassays with Hyalella azteca and Chironomus tentans , 1997 .

[7]  R. Ribeiro,et al.  New Artificial Sediment for Chironomus riparius Toxicity Testing , 1999, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[8]  R. Kheir,et al.  An in situ system for exposing aquatic invertebrates to contaminated sediments , 2000 .

[9]  D. Pascoe,et al.  Use of the freshwater macroinvertebrate Chironomus riparius (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the assessment of sediment toxicity , 1996 .

[10]  R. Wentsel,et al.  Emergence of the midge chironomus tentans when exposed to heavy metal contaminated sediment , 1978, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  I. Lopes,et al.  Discriminating the ecotoxicity due to metals and to low pH in acid mine drainage. , 1999, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[12]  J. Pellinen,et al.  Effect of sediment type, feeding level, and larval density on growth and development of a midge (Chironomus riparius) , 1999 .

[13]  A. Mcintyre,et al.  Methods for the study of marine benthos. IBP Handbook No.16 , 1971 .

[14]  G. Ankley,et al.  The significance of growth in Chironomus tentans sediment toxicity tests: Relationship to reproduction and demographic endpoints , 1997 .

[15]  G. Ankley,et al.  Chironomus tentans life‐cycle test: Design and evaluation for use in assessing toxicity of contaminated sediments , 1997 .

[16]  G. Allen Burton,et al.  Assessment of nonpoint‐source runoff in a stream using in situ and laboratory approaches , 1999 .

[17]  J. C. Balogh,et al.  Evaluation of potential confounding factors in sediment toxicity tests with three freshwater benthic invertebrates , 1994 .

[18]  Trefor B. Reynoldson,et al.  Effect of indigenous animals on chronic end points in freshwater sediment toxicity tests , 1994 .

[19]  C. Naylor,et al.  Development of a test method for Chironomus riparius using a formulated sediment , 1995 .

[20]  R. Ribeiro,et al.  Water-column, sediment, and in situ chronic bioassays with cladocerans. , 2000, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[21]  G. A. Burton,et al.  Toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants using freshwater invertebrates: A review of methods and applications , 1995 .

[22]  I. Lopes,et al.  Ecotoxicological tools in the remediation of acid mine drainage , 1999 .

[23]  M. Cairns,et al.  Biological methods for determining toxicity of contaminated freshwater sediments to invertebrates , 1984 .

[24]  Gerald T. Ankley,et al.  Methods for measuring the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates , 1994 .

[25]  J. Shaw,et al.  Evaluating macroinvertebrate population and community level effects in outdoor microcosms: Use of in situ bioassays and multivariate analysis , 1996 .

[26]  Mark Crane,et al.  Measurement by in situ bioassay of water quality in an agricultural catchment , 1995 .

[27]  Gerald T. Ankley,et al.  IN SITU BIOASSAY CHAMBER FOR ASSESSMENT OF SEDIMENT TOXICITY AND BIOACCUMULATION USING BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES , 1999 .

[28]  G. A. Burton,et al.  Assessing the toxicity of freshwater sediments , 1991 .

[29]  P. Monson,et al.  Phototoxic response of Lumbriculus variegatus to sediments contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , 1995 .

[30]  G. Bigham,et al.  Comparison of the 10-day freshwater sediment toxicity tests using Hyalella azteca and Chironomus tentans , 1995 .

[31]  J. Giesy,et al.  Comparison of three sediment bioassay methods using detroit river sediments , 1988 .

[32]  G. G. Hess,et al.  In situ toxicity evaluations of turbidity and photoinduction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , 1996 .

[33]  R. Beiras,et al.  Effects of storage temperature and duration on toxicity of sediments assessed by Crassostrea gigas oyster embryo bioassay , 1998 .

[34]  T. Dewitt,et al.  Do amphipods have the same concentration‐response to contaminated sediment in situ as in vitro? , 1999 .