Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly

BackgroundDispersal between habitat patches is a key process in the functioning of (meta)populations. As distance between suitable habitats increases, the ongoing process of habitat fragmentation is expected to generate strong selection pressures on movement behaviour. This leads to an increase or decrease of dispersal according to its cost relative to landscape structure. To limit the cost of dispersal in an increasingly hostile matrix, we predict that organisms would adopt special dispersal behaviour between habitats, which are different from movements associated with resource searching in suitable habitats.ResultsHere we quantified the movement behaviour of the bog fritillary butterfly (Proclossiana eunomia) by (1) assessing perceptual range, the distance to which the habitat can be perceived, and (2) tracking and parameterizing movement behaviour within and outside habitat (parameters were move length and turning angles distributions). Results are three-fold. (1) Perceptual range was < 30 m. (2) Movements were significantly straighter in the matrix than within the habitat. (3) Correlated random walk adequately described movement behaviour for 70% of the observed movement paths within habitat and in the matrix.ConclusionThe perceptual range being lower than the distance between habitat patches in the study area, P. eunomia likely perceives these habitat networks as fragmented, and must locate suitable habitats while dispersing across the landscape matrix. Such a constraint means that dispersal entails costs, and that selection pressure should favour behaviours that limit these costs. Indeed, our finding that dispersal movements in the matrix are straighter than resource searching movements within habitat supports the prediction of simulation studies that adopting straight movements for dispersal reduces its costs in fragmented landscapes. Our results support the mounting evidence that dispersal in fragmented landscapes evolved towards the use of specific movement behaviour, different from explorative searching movements within habitat.

[1]  T. Ricketts The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented Landscapes , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[2]  D. C. Patrick,et al.  Field test for environmental correlates of dispersal in hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus , 2001 .

[3]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[4]  Elizabeth E. Crone,et al.  EDGE-MEDIATED DISPERSAL BEHAVIOR IN A PRAIRIE BUTTERFLY , 2001 .

[5]  M. Baguette,et al.  Dispersal, landscape occupancy and population structure in the butterfly Melanargia galathea , 2004 .

[6]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  SEARCH COSTS AND HABITAT SELECTION BY DISPERSERS , 2005 .

[7]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk , 1983, Oecologia.

[8]  J. Wiens,et al.  Interactions between landscape structure and animal behavior: the roles of heterogeneously distributed resources and food deprivation on movement patterns , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. , 2006, Ecology.

[10]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 1997 .

[11]  Veronica A. J. Doerr,et al.  Dispersal range analysis: quantifying individual variation in dispersal behaviour , 2004, Oecologia.

[12]  Veronica A. J. Doerr,et al.  FRACTAL ANALYSIS CAN EXPLAIN INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN DISPERSAL SEARCH PATHS , 2004 .

[13]  Michel Baguette,et al.  Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly , 2003 .

[14]  S. Petit,et al.  Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. , 2003, Comptes rendus biologies.

[15]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Movements of cactus bugs: Patch transfers, matrix resistance, and edge permeability , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  J. Roland,et al.  ALPINE PARNASSIUS BUTTERFLY DISPERSAL: EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE AND POPULATION SIZE , 2000 .

[17]  Hans Van Dyck,et al.  Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Routine or special movements? , 2005 .

[18]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  T. Benton,et al.  Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[20]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[21]  N. Yoccoz,et al.  Studying Transfer Processes in Metapopulations: Emigration, Migration, and Colonization , 1997 .

[22]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  M. Baars,et al.  Patterns of movement of radioactive carabid beetles , 1979, Oecologia.

[24]  Kyle J. Haynes,et al.  Interpatch movement and edge effects: the role of behavioral responses to the landscape matrix , 2006 .

[25]  Matthysen,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and insect flight: a changing 'design' in a changing landscape? , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  R. Dennis The Ecology of butterflies in Britain , 1994 .

[27]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes , 2004 .

[28]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. , 2003, The Journal of animal ecology.

[29]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  THE SEARCH FOR RESOURCES BY CABBAGE BUTTERFLIES (PIERIS RAPAE): ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES AND ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF MARKOVIAN MOVEMENTS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT' , 1984 .

[30]  M. Baguette,et al.  Adult movements between populations in the specialist butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) , 1994 .

[31]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[32]  Michael A. Stephens,et al.  Tests of fit for the von Mises distribution , 1985 .

[33]  J. Roland,et al.  Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae) , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[34]  S. Harrison,et al.  Long-distance dispersal and colonization in the Bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis , 1989 .

[35]  S. Harrison,et al.  LONG-DISTANCE DISPERSAL AND COLONIZATION IN THE BAY CHECKERSPOT BUTTERFLY, , 1989 .

[36]  Hans Van Dyck,et al.  Habitat fragmentation affects habitat-finding ability of the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria L. , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  M. Rankin The cost of migration in insects , 1992 .

[38]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RAMAS/GIS , 2004 .

[39]  S. Matter,et al.  Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  L. Gall The effects of capturing and marking on subsequent activity in Boloria acrocnema (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), with a comparison of different numerical models that estimate population size , 1984 .

[41]  N. Haddad Corridor Use Predicted from Behaviors at Habitat Boundaries , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[42]  Kyle J. Haynes,et al.  MATRIX COMPOSITION AFFECTS THE SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF A PRAIRIE PLANTHOPPER , 2003 .

[43]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral tradeoffs when dispersing across a patchy landscape , 2005 .

[44]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Translating Foraging Movements in Heterogeneous Environments into the Spatial Distribution of Foragers , 1991 .

[45]  Leslie Ries,et al.  Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa , 2001 .

[46]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes : an experiment with Eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie , 1992 .

[47]  P. Turchin Quantitative Analysis Of Movement , 1998 .

[48]  M. Baguette,et al.  Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint , 2004 .

[49]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population , 2002 .

[50]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[51]  Hans Van Dyck,et al.  Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint , 2003 .

[52]  M. Baguette,et al.  Dispersal, colonization power and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) , 1996 .

[53]  James T. Cronin,et al.  MOVEMENT AND SPATIAL POPULATION STRUCTURE OF A PRAIRIE PLANTHOPPER , 2003 .

[54]  B. J. Goodwin,et al.  Effect of landscape structure on the movement behaviour of a specialized goldenrod beetle, Trirhabda borealis , 2002 .

[55]  J. Roland,et al.  Effects of meadow suitability on female behaviour in the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus , 2002 .

[56]  P. Turchin Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[57]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patches , 2001, Oecologia.

[58]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Coping with a Capricious Environment: A Population Study of a Rare Pierid Butterfly , 1985 .

[59]  G. Fry,et al.  Experimental simulation of some visual and physical components of a hedge and the effects on butterfly behaviour in an agricultural landscape , 2001 .

[60]  David R. Bowne,et al.  Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[61]  Vilis O. Nams,et al.  The VFractal: a new estimator for fractal dimension of animal movement paths , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[62]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches , 2001 .

[63]  R. Costantino,et al.  Can noise induce chaos , 2003 .

[64]  N. Schtickzelle,et al.  Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) , 2004, Landscape Ecology.