Changes and Sources of Changes of Middle School Teachers’ Self-efficacy for Teaching Science in A Computationally Rich Environment: A Mixed-Methods Study

ABSTRACT The inclusion of computational thinking (CT) into science curricula has advocated implementing a computationally rich science learning environment where students learn science via building models in a computer programming platform. Such an approach may influence teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching science which may also be associated with their self-efficacy for teaching CT. Framed using Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, this study investigated the changes and sources of changes of Indonesian teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching science and CT and looking at whether the two constructs are correlated. A total of eleven Indonesian middle school science teachers (seven in-service and four pre-service) participated in a CT-integrated science instruction workshop. They then implemented the curriculum they learned and obtained from the workshop in their classrooms. The teachers took questionnaires on science and CT teaching efficacy beliefs four times: before and after the workshop and before and after they taught. As a follow-up, interviews and writing reflections were collected after they took the instruments. Skillings-Mack and repeated-measures correlation tests were run on the quantitative data, and the qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results from quantitative analyses revealed a pattern of increasing teachers’ self-efficacy for teaching science and CT in a computationally rich environment over the administrations of the instrument. Thematic analysis showed three sources of teachers’ self-efficacy: computer programming experience, students’ interests, and teaching repetition and field experience. This study calls attention to the importance of providing experience for teachers to teach science in a computationally rich environment, whether through professional development or teacher education programs.

[1]  E. Wiebe,et al.  An alternative to STEBI-A: validation of the T-STEM science scale , 2022, International Journal of STEM Education.

[2]  Stacie L. Mason,et al.  Measuring the effect of continuous professional development on elementary teachers' self-efficacy to teach coding and computational thinking , 2021, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Measuring in-service teacher self-efficacy for teaching computational thinking: development and validation of the T-STEM CT , 2021, Education and Information Technologies.

[4]  E. Becker,et al.  Situational fluctuations in student teachers’ self-efficacy and its relation to perceived teaching experiences and cooperating teachers’ discourse elements during the teaching practicum , 2021, Teaching and Teacher Education.

[5]  E. Wiebe,et al.  The effects of prior experience and gender on middle school students' computer science learning and monitoring accuracy in the Use-Modify-Create progression , 2021 .

[6]  Edit Yerushalmi,et al.  Science Teachers’ Attitudes towards Computational Modeling in the Context of an Inquiry-Based Learning Module , 2020, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[7]  Yue Yin,et al.  Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies , 2020, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Modeling and Measuring High School Students’ Computational Thinking Practices in Science , 2020, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[9]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Exploring Force and Motion Concepts in Middle Grades Using Computational Modeling: a Classroom Intervention Study , 2019, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[10]  Irene A. Lee,et al.  Computational Thinking Integration Patterns Along the Framework Defining Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective , 2020 .

[11]  D. Ketelhut,et al.  Teacher Change Following a Professional Development Experience in Integrating Computational Thinking into Elementary Science , 2019, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[12]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Learning natural selection through computational thinking: Unplugged design of algorithmic explanations , 2019, Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

[13]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Computational Thinking Education , 2019 .

[14]  Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al.  Development of a Lean Computational Thinking Abilities Assessment for Middle Grades Students , 2019, SIGCSE.

[15]  M. Thomson,et al.  Developmental science efficacy trajectories of novice teachers from a STEM-Focused program: A longitudinal mixed-methods investigation , 2019, Teaching and Teacher Education.

[16]  Nantapath Trakultraipruk,et al.  Skillings-Mack Statistic: Computer-Intensive Methods , 2019 .

[17]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Introducing and Assessing Computational Thinking in the Secondary Science Classroom , 2019, Computational Thinking Education.

[18]  James C. Lester,et al.  Computational Thinking Integration into Middle Grades Science Classrooms: Strategies for Meeting the Challenges , 2018 .

[19]  B. Wei An Exploratory Study of Teacher Development in the Implementation of Integrated Science Curriculum , 2018, Research in Science Education.

[20]  M. A. d’Alessio The Effect of Microteaching on Science Teaching Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Preservice Elementary Teachers , 2018, Journal of Science Teacher Education.

[21]  Laura Zangori,et al.  Exploring Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions and Characterizations of Model-Oriented Issue-Based Teaching , 2018, Journal of Science Teacher Education.

[22]  Sue Sentance,et al.  Computer Science Education: Perspectives on Teaching and Learning in School , 2018 .

[23]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Professional Development for Secondary Science Teachers: A Faded Scaffolding Approach to Preparing Teachers to Integrate Computing , 2018, ICLS.

[24]  Hanna Kim,et al.  Enhancing future K-8 teachers’ computational thinking skills through modeling and simulations , 2018, Education and Information Technologies.

[25]  V. Shute,et al.  Demystifying computational thinking , 2017 .

[26]  Aditi Wagh,et al.  Bridging inquiry‐based science and constructionism: Exploring the alignment between students tinkering with code of computational models and goals of inquiry , 2017 .

[27]  J. Bakdash,et al.  Repeated Measures Correlation , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[28]  Kamini Jaipal-Jamani,et al.  Effect of Robotics on Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Science Learning, and Computational Thinking , 2017 .

[29]  Sue Sentance,et al.  It's Computational Thinking! Bebras Tasks in the Curriculum , 2016, ISSEP.

[30]  Deepika Menon,et al.  Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Science Content Knowledge , 2016 .

[31]  Olatokunbo S. Fashola,et al.  Using Robotics and Game Design to Enhance Children’s Self-Efficacy, STEM Attitudes, and Computational Thinking Skills , 2016 .

[32]  Laura M. Stapleton,et al.  The Effect of Small Sample Size on Two-Level Model Estimates: A Review and Illustration , 2014, Educational Psychology Review.

[33]  Michael S. Horn,et al.  Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms , 2016 .

[34]  H. Koomen,et al.  Teacher Self-Efficacy and Its Effects on Classroom Processes, Student Academic Adjustment, and Teacher Well-Being , 2016 .

[35]  Zee Teacher Self-Efficacy and Its Effects on Classroom Processes, Student Academic Adjustment, and Teacher Well-Being: A Synthesis of 40 Years of Research , 2016 .

[36]  Petra Kaufmann,et al.  Experimental And Quasi Experimental Designs For Research , 2016 .

[37]  Krista Althauser Job-embedded professional development: its impact on teacher self-efficacy and student performance , 2015 .

[38]  L. Hobbs TEACHING ‘OUT-OF-FIELD’ AS A BOUNDARY-CROSSING EVENT: FACTORS SHAPING TEACHER IDENTITY , 2013 .

[39]  Ngss Lead States Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[40]  Barbara P. Heath,et al.  The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards‐based instruction , 2011 .

[41]  S. Karabenick,et al.  Taking Teacher Responsibility Into Account(ability): Explicating Its Multiple Components and Theoretical Status , 2011 .

[42]  Joyce Malyn-Smith,et al.  Computational thinking for youth in practice , 2011, INROADS.

[43]  P. Harrell Teaching an Integrated Science Curriculum: Linking Teacher Knowledge and Teaching Assignments. , 2010 .

[44]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  Sources of Self‐Efficacy: Four Professional Development Formats and Their Relationship to Self‐Efficacy and Implementation of a New Teaching Strategy , 2009, The Elementary School Journal.

[45]  Damian W. Betebenner Norm- and Criterion-Referenced Student Growth. , 2009 .

[46]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[47]  Andrew D. Ho The Problem With “Proficiency”: Limitations of Statistics and Policy Under No Child Left Behind , 2008 .

[48]  T. Wigram,et al.  Therapeutic Songwriting in Music Therapy , 2008 .

[49]  Amy B. Dellinger,et al.  Measuring Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs: Development and Use of the TEBS-Self. , 2008 .

[50]  Jeannette M. Wing Computational thinking and thinking about computing , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[51]  Eun-Seok Cha,et al.  Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[52]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[53]  A. Bandura Toward a Psychology of Human Agency , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[54]  Jeannette M. Wing An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation , 2007, SIGCSE.

[55]  David M Williams,et al.  A review of the outcome expectancy construct in physical activity research , 2005, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[56]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  Fostering Student Learning: The Relationship of Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement , 2004 .

[57]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  Evaluating Value-Added Models for Teacher Accountability , 2004 .

[58]  Mimi Bong,et al.  Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How Different Are They Really? , 2003 .

[59]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct , 2001 .

[60]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[61]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[62]  L. Enochs,et al.  Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument , 1990 .

[63]  Myron H. Dembo,et al.  Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. , 1984 .

[64]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[65]  A. Agresti,et al.  Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences , 1979 .

[66]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[67]  R. Brislin Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[68]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.