Sampling of slow diffusive conformational transitions with accelerated molecular dynamics.

Slow diffusive conformational transitions play key functional roles in biomolecular systems. Our ability to sample these motions with molecular dynamics simulation in explicit solvent is limited by the slow diffusion of the solvent molecules around the biomolecules. Previously, we proposed an accelerated molecular dynamics method that has been shown to efficiently sample the torsional degrees of freedom of biomolecules beyond the millisecond timescale. However, in our previous approach, large-amplitude displacements of biomolecules are still slowed by the diffusion of the solvent. Here we present a unified approach of efficiently sampling both the torsional degrees of freedom and the diffusive motions concurrently. We show that this approach samples the configuration space more efficiently than normal molecular dynamics and that ensemble averages converge faster to the correct values.

[1]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[2]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[3]  Grubmüller,et al.  Predicting slow structural transitions in macromolecular systems: Conformational flooding. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[4]  A. Voter Hyperdynamics: Accelerated Molecular Dynamics of Infrequent Events , 1997 .

[5]  John W. Wilkins,et al.  Simple bias potential for boosting molecular dynamics with the hyperdynamics scheme , 1998 .

[6]  Xingao Gong,et al.  Hyper molecular dynamics with a local bias potential , 1999 .

[7]  Lisa J. Lapidus,et al.  Measuring the rate of intramolecular contact formation in polypeptides. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. Case,et al.  Modification of the Generalized Born Model Suitable for Macromolecules , 2000 .

[9]  K. Fichthorn,et al.  Accelerated molecular dynamics of rare events using the local boost method , 2001 .

[10]  G. Hummer,et al.  Peptide loop-closure kinetics from microsecond molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  J. Tully,et al.  Puddle-skimming: An efficient sampling of multidimensional configuration space , 2002 .

[12]  W. Nau,et al.  A fluorescence-based method for direct measurement of submicrosecond intramolecular contact formation in biopolymers: an exploratory study with polypeptides. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  J. Mongan,et al.  Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[14]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Standard free energy of releasing a localized water molecule from the binding pockets of proteins: double-decoupling method. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  Structural and Dynamic Properties of the CAGQW Peptide in Water: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study Using Different Force Fields , 2004 .

[16]  Chandra S Verma,et al.  Prion and water: tight and dynamical hydration sites have a key role in structural stability. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Phosphorylation effects on cis/trans isomerization and the backbone conformation of serine-proline motifs: accelerated molecular dynamics analysis. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Relating kinetic rates and local energetic roughness by accelerated molecular-dynamics simulations. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Fast peptidyl cis-trans isomerization within the flexible Gly-rich flaps of HIV-1 protease. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  Lisa J. Lapidus,et al.  Effects of denaturants on the dynamics of loop formation in polypeptides. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[22]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Distance distributions of short polypeptides recovered by fluorescence resonance energy transfer in the 10 A domain. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Insight into the role of hydration on protein dynamics. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  Stewart A. Adcock,et al.  Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[25]  D. Hamelberg,et al.  Elasticity of peptide omega bonds. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  On the application of accelerated molecular dynamics to liquid water simulations. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[27]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[28]  Lijiang Yang,et al.  Application of the accelerated molecular dynamics simulations to the folding of a small protein. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  Y. Duan,et al.  Statistical properties and kinetics of end-end contact formation of unfolded polypeptides: a systematic molecular dynamics study. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[30]  G. Bouvignies,et al.  Exploring multiple timescale motions in protein GB3 using accelerated molecular dynamics and NMR spectroscopy. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.