Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: evaluation and outcomes.

Summary The optimization of reperfusion therapy for STEMI pa-tients by developing coordinated care systems that includeincreased access to primary PCI offers a unique opportu-nity for collaboration in the delivery of care. If imple-mented correctly, such coordinated care systems have thepotential to improve outcomes substantially for patientswith acute myocardial infarction, which is still the leadingcause of morbidity and mortality in the United States.Although the opportunities for improvements are vast,these can only be achieved by tracking processes of careand outcomes with standardized quality metrics and care-ful external oversight. Ensuring that appropriate metricsare implemented in a transparent fashion should help toengage the numerous parties involved in STEMI care andwill foster the necessary trust and collaboration that suchambitious changes in care will demand. Disclosures Potential conflicts of interest for members of the writing groups forall sections of these conference proceedings are provided in adisclosure table included with the Executive Summary.

[1]  E. Peterson,et al.  Patterns of guideline adherence and care delivery for patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative). , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Payment for quality: guiding principles and recommendations: principles and recommendations from the American Heart Association's Reimbursement, Coverage, and Access Policy Development Workgroup. , 2006, Circulation.

[3]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ACC/AHA clinical performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures on ST-Elevation and Non-ST-El , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Jane A. Linderbaum,et al.  ACC/AHA clinical performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures on ST-Elevation and Non-ST-El , 2006, Circulation.

[5]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  R. Gliklich,et al.  Get with the guidelines for cardiovascular secondary prevention: pilot results. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  Robert M Califf,et al.  Integrating quality into the cycle of therapeutic development. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  José Maria Paganni,et al.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. , 1966, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.