Osseointegration evaluation of an experimental bone graft material based on hydroxyapatite, reinforced with titanium-based particles

Bone graft materials are more and more frequently used in dentistry for improving the periodontal support and for creating a bone support favorable for the insertion of dental implants. The experimental study carried out on laboratory animals aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility and the manner of integration of an experimental bone augmentation material, based on hydroxyapatite (HAp), reinforced with titanium-based particles by comparison with a commercial synthetic graft material already existing on the profile market, also based on HAp. We noticed a common pattern of evolution, although there were differences related to the speed of new bone tissue formation and implicitly the morphological elements captured at the two moments of time. In the presence of both synthetic materials, ossification also begins from the center of the cavity at distance from the margins of the bone defect, with a common pattern with an appearance with the presence of osteon-like structures. The experimental material generally determined a more intense initial inflammatory reaction, followed by the generation of a repair bone tissue with a denser appearance but with a less uniform structure and a greater number of residual particles.

[1]  K. Darwich,et al.  Radiological Comparative Study Between Conventional and Nano Hydroxyapatite With Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) Membranes for Their Effects on Alveolar Bone Density , 2022, Cureus.

[2]  P. Schüpbach,et al.  Screening of Hydroxyapatite Biomaterials for Alveolar Augmentation Using a Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defect Model: Bone Formation/Maturation and Biomaterials Resolution , 2022, Biomolecules.

[3]  L. Shao,et al.  A bioactive glass functional hydrogel enhances bone augmentation via synergistic angiogenesis, self-swelling and osteogenesis , 2022, Bioactive materials.

[4]  P. Zapata,et al.  Comparison of Two Bovine Commercial Xenografts in the Regeneration of Critical Cranial Defects , 2022, Molecules.

[5]  J. Thomsen,et al.  Drill-Hole Bone Defects in Animal Models of Bone Healing: Protocol for a Systematic Review , 2022, JMIR research protocols.

[6]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Histological and Biological Response to Different Types of Biomaterials: A Narrative Single Research Center Experience over Three Decades , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[7]  A. Veras,et al.  Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study , 2022, Membranes.

[8]  J. Markowski,et al.  Comparison of Physicochemical, Mechanical, and (Micro-)Biological Properties of Sintered Scaffolds Based on Natural- and Synthetic Hydroxyapatite Supplemented with Selected Dopants , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[9]  Koichiro Hayashi,et al.  Structurally optimized honeycomb scaffolds with outstanding ability for vertical bone augmentation , 2022, Journal of advanced research.

[10]  C. Gomillion,et al.  Conductive Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Current State and Future Outlook , 2021, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[11]  A. Didilescu,et al.  The efficiency of using enamel matrix derivative in therapeutic approach of periodontal furcation defects of maxillary and mandibular molars , 2021, Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie.

[12]  C. W. Cheah,et al.  Synthetic Material for Bone, Periodontal, and Dental Tissue Regeneration: Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading Next? , 2021, Materials.

[13]  R. Smeets,et al.  A systematic review on the effect of inorganic surface coatings in large animal models and meta‐analysis on tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite on periimplant bone formation , 2021, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[14]  C. Oancea,et al.  Calcium fructoborate coating of titanium–hydroxyapatite implants by chemisorption deposition improves implant osseointegration in the femur of New Zealand White rabbit experimental model , 2021, Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie.

[15]  A. Shavandi,et al.  Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments , 2021, Molecules.

[16]  H. Noguchi,et al.  Unidirectional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite artificial bone: a review of experimental evaluations and clinical applications , 2021, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[17]  Jiayin Deng,et al.  Scientometric Analysis of Dental Implant Research over the Past 10 Years and Future Research Trends , 2021, BioMed research international.

[18]  B. Dikici,et al.  Titanium-based composite scaffolds reinforced with hydroxyapatite-zirconia: Production, mechanical and in-vitro characterization. , 2021, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[19]  E. Vasile,et al.  In vitro characterization of novel nanostructured collagen-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds doped with magnesium with improved biodegradation rate for hard tissue regeneration , 2021, Bioactive materials.

[20]  H. Stanca,et al.  Tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite treatment for benign cavitary bone lesions: A prospective clinical trial. , 2020, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[21]  J. Martínez-González,et al.  Clinical performance of alveolar ridge augmentation with xenogeneic bone block grafts versus autogenous bone block grafts. A systematic review. , 2020, Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[22]  L. Ardelean,et al.  Advanced Biomaterials and Techniques for Oral Tissue Engineering and Regeneration—A Review , 2020, Materials.

[23]  J. D. da Silva,et al.  Zirconia/hydroxyapatite (80/20) scaffold repair in critical size calvarial defect increased FGF-2, osteocalcin and OPG immunostaining and IL-10 levels. , 2020, American journal of translational research.

[24]  H. Harada,et al.  Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles as Injectable Bone Substitute Material in a Vertical Bone Augmentation Model , 2020, In Vivo.

[25]  J. Jakubowicz Special Issue: Ti-Based Biomaterials: Synthesis, Properties and Applications , 2020, Materials.

[26]  R. Apsari,et al.  Biocompatibility and osteoconductivity of scaffold porous composite collagen–hydroxyapatite based coral for bone regeneration , 2020 .

[27]  Jui-Sheng Sun,et al.  Biomimetic Synthesis of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Composites: Therapeutic Potential and Effects on Bone Regeneration , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[28]  V. Kattimani,et al.  Role of Synthetic Hydroxyapatite-In Socket Preservation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2019, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[29]  B. Houshmand,et al.  Biomaterial selection for bone augmentation in implant dentistry: A systematic review , 2019, Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research.

[30]  Yin Xiao,et al.  A standardized rat burr hole defect model to study maxillofacial bone regeneration. , 2019, Acta biomaterialia.

[31]  S. Kargozar,et al.  Biomaterials, Current Strategies, and Novel Nano-Technological Approaches for Periodontal Regeneration , 2019, Journal of functional biomaterials.

[32]  L. Mogoantă,et al.  Osseointegration Evaluation of Two Socket Preservation Materials in Small Diameter Bone Cavities An in vivo lab rats study , 2018, Revista de Chimie.

[33]  I. Ana,et al.  The use of hydroxyapatite bone substitute grafting for alveolar ridge preservation, sinus augmentation, and periodontal bone defect: A systematic review , 2018, Heliyon.

[34]  P. Schüpbach,et al.  Screening of candidate biomaterials for alveolar augmentation using a critical‐size rat calvaria defect model , 2018, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[35]  G. Stan,et al.  Osteoblast Cell Response to Naturally Derived Calcium Phosphate-Based Materials , 2018, Materials.

[36]  D. Gheorghe,et al.  The Sintering Behaviour and Mechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite - Based Composites for Bone Tissue Regeneration , 2018, Materiale Plastice.

[37]  A. Musset,et al.  Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management , 2018, Journal of tissue engineering.

[38]  S. Andreana,et al.  Is Bone Graft or Guided Bone Regeneration Needed When Placing Immediate Dental Implants? A Systematic Review , 2017, Implant dentistry.

[39]  K. Yeung,et al.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review , 2017, Bioactive materials.

[40]  S. Tanasescu,et al.  Microstructure, stability and biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite – titania nanocomposites formed by two step sintering process , 2017, Arabian Journal of Chemistry.

[41]  V. Kattimani,et al.  Hydroxyapatite—Past, Present, and Future in Bone Regeneration , 2016 .

[42]  Julietta V Rau,et al.  Bioactive Materials for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2016, BioMed research international.

[43]  G. Palaia,et al.  Nano-hydroxyapatite and its applications in preventive, restorative and regenerative dentistry: a review of literature. , 2014, Annali di stomatologia.

[44]  Wei-Shou Hu,et al.  Titanium-enriched hydroxyapatite-gelatin scaffolds with osteogenically differentiated progenitor cell aggregates for calvaria bone regeneration. , 2013, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[45]  A. Reddi,et al.  Morphogenesis and tissue engineering of bone and cartilage: inductive signals, stem cells, and biomimetic biomaterials. , 2000, Tissue engineering.

[46]  L. Mogoantă,et al.  An evaluation of a collagen-based material osseointegration. , 2017, Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie.