Activated Membrane Patches Guide Chemotactic Cell Motility

Many eukaryotic cells are able to crawl on surfaces and guide their motility based on environmental cues. These cues are interpreted by signaling systems which couple to cell mechanics; indeed membrane protrusions in crawling cells are often accompanied by activated membrane patches, which are localized areas of increased concentration of one or more signaling components. To determine how these patches are related to cell motion, we examine the spatial localization of RasGTP in chemotaxing Dictyostelium discoideum cells under conditions where the vertical extent of the cell was restricted. Quantitative analyses of the data reveal a high degree of spatial correlation between patches of activated Ras and membrane protrusions. Based on these findings, we formulate a model for amoeboid cell motion that consists of two coupled modules. The first module utilizes a recently developed two-component reaction diffusion model that generates transient and localized areas of elevated concentration of one of the components along the membrane. The activated patches determine the location of membrane protrusions (and overall cell motion) that are computed in the second module, which also takes into account the cortical tension and the availability of protrusion resources. We show that our model is able to produce realistic amoeboid-like motion and that our numerical results are consistent with experimentally observed pseudopod dynamics. Specifically, we show that the commonly observed splitting of pseudopods can result directly from the dynamics of the signaling patches.

[1]  R. Insall,et al.  Chemotaxis in Dictyostelium: how to walk straight using parallel pathways. , 2007, Current opinion in microbiology.

[2]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  Mathematics of Cell Motility: Have We Got Its Number? , 2022 .

[3]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Uniform cAMP stimulation of Dictyostelium cells induces localized patches of signal transduction and pseudopodia. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  Richard A. Firtel,et al.  Localized Ras signaling at the leading edge regulates PI3K, cell polarity, and directional cell movement , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  Juan C. del Álamo,et al.  Myosin II Is Essential for the Spatiotemporal Organization of Traction Forces during Cell Motility , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  Multiscale Two-Dimensional Modeling of a Motile Simple-Shaped Cell , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[8]  Pascale G. Charest,et al.  Spatiotemporal Regulation of Ras Activity Provides Directional Sensing , 2008, Current Biology.

[9]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells: a focus on leukocytes and Dictyostelium. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[10]  W. Loomis,et al.  Cell motility and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium amebae lacking myosin heavy chain. , 1988, Developmental biology.

[11]  Rajan P Kulkarni,et al.  Tunability and Noise Dependence in Differentiation Dynamics , 2007, Science.

[12]  J. Small,et al.  The comings and goings of actin: coupling protrusion and retraction in cell motility. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[13]  B. Shaffer Aggregation in Cellular Slime Moulds: in vitro Isolation of Acrasin , 1953, Nature.

[14]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation , 2006, Nature.

[15]  Herbert Levine,et al.  Cooperative self-organization of microorganisms , 2000 .

[16]  W. Rappel,et al.  Eukaryotic chemotaxis , 2009, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[17]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast , 2007, Nature.

[18]  D. Soll,et al.  Motion Analysis of Living Cells , 1997 .

[19]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Navigating through models of chemotaxis. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[20]  E. Sackmann,et al.  A micromechanic study of cell polarity and plasma membrane cell body coupling in Dictyostelium. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Richard A. Firtel,et al.  G protein–independent Ras/PI3K/F-actin circuit regulates basic cell motility , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Navigation of Chemotactic Cells by Parallel Signaling to Pseudopod Persistence and Orientation , 2009, PloS one.

[23]  G. Spiegelman,et al.  Chemoattractant‐induced Ras activation during Dictyostelium aggregation , 2004, EMBO reports.

[24]  H. Levine,et al.  Transient localized patterns in noise-driven reaction-diffusion systems. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[25]  Monica L. Skoge,et al.  Gradient sensing in defined chemotactic fields. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[26]  Chuan-Hsiang Huang,et al.  Eukaryotic chemotaxis: a network of signaling pathways controls motility, directional sensing, and polarity. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[27]  G. Borisy,et al.  Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back , 2003, Science.

[28]  Christopher Janetopoulos,et al.  Directional sensing during chemotaxis , 2008, FEBS letters.

[29]  Liu Yang,et al.  Modeling cellular deformations using the level set formalism , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[30]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Quimp3, an automated pseudopod-tracking algorithm , 2010, Cell adhesion & migration.

[31]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Herbert Levine,et al.  Pattern selection in fingered growth phenomena , 1988 .

[33]  W. Rappel,et al.  Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis: threshold for directed motion. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.

[34]  Tian Jin,et al.  Key Role of Local Regulation in Chemosensing Revealed by a New Molecular Interaction-Based Modeling Method , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  T. Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.

[36]  L. Sander,et al.  The role of cell contraction and adhesion in dictyostelium motility. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[37]  R. Firtel,et al.  Two Poles and a Compass , 2003, Cell.

[38]  Ya-lun Chou,et al.  Statistical analysis, with business and economic applications , 1975 .

[39]  Natalie Andrew,et al.  Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[40]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Navigating signaling networks: chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[41]  J. Joanny,et al.  Contractility and retrograde flow in lamellipodium motion , 2006, Physical biology.

[42]  C. Parent,et al.  Eukaryotic chemotaxis at a glance , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[43]  P. Iglesias,et al.  Chemoattractant-induced phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate accumulation is spatially amplified and adapts, independent of the actin cytoskeleton , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Masaki Sasai,et al.  Cortical Factor Feedback Model for Cellular Locomotion and Cytofission , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[45]  G. Laevsky,et al.  Under-agarose folate chemotaxis of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae in permissive and mechanically inhibited conditions. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[46]  W. Rappel,et al.  Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Joachim Goedhart,et al.  Sensitization of Dictyostelium chemotaxis by phosphoinositide-3-kinase-mediated self-organizing signalling patches , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[49]  W. Rappel,et al.  External and internal constraints on eukaryotic chemotaxis , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  C. Parent,et al.  A cell's sense of direction. , 1999, Science.

[51]  C. Schaniel,et al.  The Role of Chemokines in Regulating Cell Migration during Humoral Immune Responses , 1999, Cell.

[52]  Roger Lui,et al.  Exploring the control circuit of cell migration by mathematical modeling. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[53]  Pascale G. Charest,et al.  Feedback signaling controls leading-edge formation during chemotaxis. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[54]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  The Ordered Extension of Pseudopodia by Amoeboid Cells in the Absence of External Cues , 2009, PloS one.

[55]  T. Meyer,et al.  A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2005, Developmental cell.