Social Media and Experiential Ambivalence

At once fearful and dependent, hopeful and distrustful, our contemporary relationship with technology is highly ambivalent. Using experiential accounts from an ongoing Facebook-based qualitative study (N = 231), I both diagnose and articulate this ambivalence. I argue that technological ambivalence is rooted primarily in the deeply embedded moral prescription to lead a meaningful life, and a related uncertainty about the role of new technologies in the accomplishment of this task. On the one hand, technology offers the potential to augment or even enhance personal and public life. On the other hand, technology looms with the potential to supplant or replace real experience. I examine these polemic potentialities in the context of personal experiences, interpersonal relationships, and political activism. I conclude by arguing that the pervasive integration and non-optionality of technical systems amplifies utopian hopes, dystopian fears, and ambivalent concerns in the contemporary era.

[1]  D. Riesman,et al.  The Lonely Crowd , 2017 .

[2]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[3]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[4]  Ann Swidler.  CULTURE IN ACTION: SYMBOLS AND STRATEGIES* , 1986 .

[5]  G. Gilder.  Microcosm: The Quantum Revolution In Economics And Technology , 1989 .

[6]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society , 1989 .

[7]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[8]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[9]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Gender Swapping on the Internet , 1993 .

[10]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[11]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[12]  M. Poster.  The Second Media Age , 1994 .

[13]  M. Ruffin.  On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[14]  R. Hart.  Easy Citizenship: Television's Curious Legacy , 1996 .

[15]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[16]  Joe Podolsky,et al.  City of bits: space, place and the infobahn , 1995, CSOC.

[17]  Alvin Toffler,et al.  Cyberspace and the American Dream: A Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age (Release 1.2, August 1994) , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[18]  Steven G. Jones.  Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety , 1997 .

[19]  Steven G. Jones.  The Internet and its social landscape , 1997 .

[20]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[21]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach , 2000 .

[22]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[23]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[24]  Jason Nolan,et al.  Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments. , 2002 .

[25]  Naomi Gerstel,et al.  Talk of Love: How Culture Matters , 2002 .

[26]  B. Massumi.  Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation , 2002 .

[27]  B. Latour,et al.  Morality and Technology , 2002, The Ethics of Biotechnology.

[28]  Zizi Papacharissi.  The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[29]  C. Elliott.  Better Than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream , 2003 .

[30]  Ross E. G. Upshur,et al.  Better than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  Sarah N. Gatson,et al.  Ethnography Online: ‘Natives’ Practising and Inscribing Community , 2004 .

[32]  Alexander N. Golub,et al.  “Just Like the Qing Empire” , 2008, Games Cult..

[33]  Michel Foucault,et al.  “Panopticism” from Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 2009 .

[34]  Celia Pearce,et al.  Communities of Play: Emergent Cultures in Multiplayer Games and Virtual Worlds , 2009 .

[35]  E. Schraube.  Technology as Materialized Action and Its Ambivalences , 2009 .

[36]  R. Kurzweil,et al.  Transcend: Nine Steps to Living Well Forever , 2009 .

[37]  Jenny L. Davis.  Architecture of the personal interactive homepage: constructing the self through MySpace , 2010, New Media Soc..

[38]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[40]  Fengshu Liu,et al.  The norm of the 'good' netizen and the construction of the 'proper' wired self: The case of Chinese urban youth , 2011, New Media Soc..

[41]  Carlyne L. Kujath.  Facebook and MySpace: Complement or Substitute for Face-to-Face Interaction? , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[42]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other , 2011 .

[43]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[44]  Jenny L. Davis.  Accomplishing authenticity in a labor-exposing space , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Networked: The New Social Operating System , 2013, Int. J. E Politics.

[46]  J. Cheung.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other , 2013 .

[47]  Technology Today : Utopia or Dystopia ? , 2022 .