Argumentation and Learning
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Emergent learning in successive activities: learning in interaction in a laboratory context , 2008 .
[2] Gail Richmond,et al. Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small‐group discourse and scientific knowledge building , 1996 .
[3] I. Sigel,et al. HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .
[4] M. Lipman. Thinking in Education , 1992 .
[5] M. Baker. ARGUMENTATIVE INTERACTIONS, DISCURSIVE OPERATIONS AND LEARNING TO MODEL IN SCIENCE , 2002 .
[6] Shirley Simon,et al. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .
[7] J. Hiebert. Conceptual and procedural knowledge : the case of mathematics , 1987 .
[8] Stephen P. Norris,et al. How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .
[9] M. Chi,et al. Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .
[10] J. F. Voss,et al. Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels , 1996 .
[11] R. Sawyer. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .
[12] Kathleen Hogan,et al. Comparing the Epistemological Underpinnings of Students' and Scientists' Reasoning about Conclusions. , 2001 .
[13] M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al. Argument in High School Genetics. , 1997 .
[14] K. Nelson,et al. Making Memories: The Influence of Joint Encoding on Later Recall by Young Children , 1994, Consciousness and Cognition.
[15] S. Toulmin. The uses of argument , 1960 .
[16] J. Osborne,et al. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .
[17] T. Kuhn,et al. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .
[18] C. Hynd. Teaching Students To Think Critically Using Multiple Texts in History. , 1999 .
[19] Yair Neuman,et al. Is self-explanation while solving problems helpful? The case of analogical problem-solving , 1998 .
[20] Neil Mercer,et al. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners , 1995 .
[21] Verbal processes in children : progress in cognitive development research , 1982 .
[22] B. Rogoff. Cognition as a collaborative process. , 1998 .
[23] Andrew Tolmie,et al. Conceptual change in biology: Group interaction and the understanding of inheritance , 2000 .
[24] Selma Leitão,et al. The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building , 2000, Human Development.
[25] Götz Krummheuer. The ethnography of argumentation. , 1995 .
[26] D. Kuhn. THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.
[27] Eduardo Fleury Mortimer,et al. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms , 2003 .
[28] Gary B. Nash,et al. History Standards and Culture Wars. , 1995 .
[29] William A. Sandoval,et al. The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations , 2005 .
[30] R. Driver,et al. Small-Group Discussion in Physics: Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours. , 1996 .
[31] William F. Brewer,et al. An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. , 1998 .
[32] G. Steiner. NARCISSUS AND ECHO: A Note on Current Arts of Reading , 1981 .
[33] A. C. Kruger. Peer collaboration: conflict, cooperation, or both? , 1993 .
[34] Shirley Simon,et al. Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom , 2006 .
[35] Michael Billig,et al. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology , 1987 .
[36] B. Rogoff. Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .
[37] S. Wineburg,et al. Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past , 2002 .
[38] Reuben Hersh,et al. 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics , 2013 .
[39] M. Baker,et al. Computer-Mediated Epistemic Dialogue: Explanation and Argumentation as Vehicles for Understanding Scientific Notions , 2002 .
[40] Erna Yackel,et al. What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation , 2002 .
[41] William A. Sandoval,et al. Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .
[42] Anat Zohar,et al. Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .
[43] I. Lakatos,et al. Proofs and Refutations: Frontmatter , 1976 .
[44] Matthew W. Lewis,et al. Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..
[45] Michael J. Baker,et al. Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .
[46] Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos,et al. Modelling mathematical argumentation: the importance of qualification , 2007 .
[47] Learning processes within and between successive activities in a laboratory context , 2008 .
[48] D. Kuhn,et al. Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning , 1997 .
[49] D. Kuhn. How do People Know? , 2001, Psychological science.
[50] N. Mercer,et al. Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom , 1999 .
[51] Mario Carretero,et al. Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences , 1994 .
[52] T. Trabasso,et al. Children’s Understanding of Stories: A Basis for Moral Judgment and Dilemma Resolution , 1982 .
[53] P. Cobb,et al. Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics. , 1996 .
[54] B. Latour,et al. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .
[55] Baruch B. Schwarz,et al. Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications From Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog , 2009, Cogn. Sci..
[56] R. Glaser. Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .
[57] Merrilee H. Salmon,et al. Reasoning in Conversation , 1993 .
[58] Yair Neuman,et al. Two Wrongs May Make a Right ... If They Argue Together! , 2000 .
[59] Baruch B. Schwarz,et al. The Blind and the Paralytic: Supporting argumentation in Everyday and Scientific Issues , 2003 .
[60] J. Pelc. Semiotic and Nonsemiotic Concepts of Meaning , 1982 .
[61] C. Miller,et al. A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning , 1993 .
[62] Charles A. Perfetti,et al. How students use texts to learn and reason about historical uncertainty , 1994 .
[64] Harvey Siegel,et al. The rationality of science, critical thinking, and science education , 1989, Synthese.
[65] Raymond Duval,et al. Structure du raisonnement deductif et apprentissage de la demonstration , 1991 .
[66] Yair Neuman,et al. Substituting one mystery for another: the role of self-explanations in solving algebra word-problems , 2000 .
[67] C. Antaki. Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts , 1994 .
[68] David R. Olson,et al. Modes of thought : explorations in culture and cognition , 1996 .
[69] J. Greeno. On Claims That Answer the Wrong Questions , 1997 .
[70] C. Garvey,et al. Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts1 , 1981 .
[71] Dietmar Küchemann,et al. Students' understandings of logical implication , 2002 .
[72] Imre Lakatos,et al. On the Uses of Rigorous Proof. (Book Reviews: Proofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery) , 1977 .
[73] Baruch B. Schwarz,et al. The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory , 2007 .
[74] Baruch B. Schwarz,et al. Collective Reading of Multiple Texts in Argumentative Activities. , 2003 .
[75] Kurt W. Fischer,et al. Development in context : acting and thinking in specific environments , 1993 .
[76] Baruch B. Schwarz,et al. Reflective Processes in a Mathematics Classroom With a Rich Learning Environment , 1999 .
[77] P. Tetlock. The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .
[78] D. Kuhn. Thinking as Argument , 1992 .
[79] N. Douek. Argumentation and Conceptualization in Context: a Case Study on Sunshadows in Primary School , 1999 .
[80] A. Flew,et al. Patterns of Discovery. , 1961 .
[81] Paul Cobb,et al. Participating in Classroom Mathematical Practices , 2001 .
[82] Victor Goldschmidt,et al. 28. Perelman (Ch.) et Olbrechts-Tyteca (L.). La nouvelle rhétorique ; Traité de l'Argumentation (Coll. Logos). Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1958 , 1958 .
[83] G. Pólya. Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning , 1958 .
[84] J. Lemke. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .
[85] D. Maynard. How children start arguments , 1985, Language in Society.
[86] Steve Woolgar,et al. Science, the very idea , 1988 .
[87] Stephanie D. Teasley. The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. , 1995 .
[88] Paul Cobb,et al. The emergence of mathematical meaning : interaction in classroom cultures , 2009 .
[89] Pierre Dillenbourg,et al. Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .
[90] J. Wertsch. The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .
[91] D. Zeidler. The central role of fallacious thinking in science education , 1997 .
[92] Jim Minstrell,et al. Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .
[93] B. Schwarz,et al. Analyses of Activity Design in Geometry in the Light of Student Actions , 2002 .
[94] Yair Neuman,et al. Construction of Collective and Individual Knowledge in Argumentative Activity , 2003 .
[95] Baruch B. Schwarz,et al. The Role of Task Design and Argumentation in Cognitive Development during Peer Interaction: The Case of Proportional Reasoning. , 2007 .
[96] C. Pontecorvo,et al. Arguing and Reasoning in Understanding Historical Topics , 1993 .
[97] M. Ferro,et al. The Use and Abuse of History: Or How the past Is Taught , 1986 .
[98] Maya Hickmann,et al. Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought , 1989 .
[99] Tsafrir Goldberg,et al. Living and dormant collective memories as contexts of history learning , 2008 .
[100] R. Duschl,et al. "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .
[101] Kpe Koeno Gravemeijer. Educational Development and Developmental Research in Mathematics Education , 1994 .
[102] Baruch B. Schwarz,et al. The antilogos ability to evaluate information supporting arguments , 2005 .
[103] Raymond S. Nickerson. Reflections on Reasoning , 1986 .
[104] N. Mercer,et al. From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development , 1999 .