Argumentation and Learning

This chapter provides multiple perspectives on the intricate relations between argumentation and learning. Different approaches to learning impinge on the way argumentation is conceived of: as a powerful vehicle for reaching shared understanding, as a set of skills pertaining to critical reasoning, or as a tool for social positioning. Each perspective has harvested empirical studies that have stressed the importance of argumentation in learning. Methodological tools that fit the respective perspectives are reviewed. In spite of the pluralistic stance adopted, this chapter attempts to draw connections between the findings obtained in the different perspectives. In a separate part, it considers the specific role of argumentation in learning processes and outcomes for four subjects areas: in mathematics, studies are presented that show deep gaps between argumentation and proof. In science, experimental studies are reviewed to examine whether and how argumentation promotes conceptual change. In history, the chapter considers the role of argumentation in challenging narratives and in claiming a position. At last, we describe the new wave that characterizes civic education programs towards the instillation of argumentative practices in democratic citizenship.

[1]  Emergent learning in successive activities: learning in interaction in a laboratory context , 2008 .

[2]  Gail Richmond,et al.  Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small‐group discourse and scientific knowledge building , 1996 .

[3]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[4]  M. Lipman Thinking in Education , 1992 .

[5]  M. Baker ARGUMENTATIVE INTERACTIONS, DISCURSIVE OPERATIONS AND LEARNING TO MODEL IN SCIENCE , 2002 .

[6]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[7]  J. Hiebert Conceptual and procedural knowledge : the case of mathematics , 1987 .

[8]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .

[9]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[10]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels , 1996 .

[11]  R. Sawyer The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[12]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Comparing the Epistemological Underpinnings of Students' and Scientists' Reasoning about Conclusions. , 2001 .

[13]  M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al.  Argument in High School Genetics. , 1997 .

[14]  K. Nelson,et al.  Making Memories: The Influence of Joint Encoding on Later Recall by Young Children , 1994, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[16]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[17]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[18]  C. Hynd Teaching Students To Think Critically Using Multiple Texts in History. , 1999 .

[19]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Is self-explanation while solving problems helpful? The case of analogical problem-solving , 1998 .

[20]  Neil Mercer,et al.  The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners , 1995 .

[21]  Verbal processes in children : progress in cognitive development research , 1982 .

[22]  B. Rogoff Cognition as a collaborative process. , 1998 .

[23]  Andrew Tolmie,et al.  Conceptual change in biology: Group interaction and the understanding of inheritance , 2000 .

[24]  Selma Leitão,et al.  The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building , 2000, Human Development.

[25]  Götz Krummheuer The ethnography of argumentation. , 1995 .

[26]  D. Kuhn THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[27]  Eduardo Fleury Mortimer,et al.  Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms , 2003 .

[28]  Gary B. Nash,et al.  History Standards and Culture Wars. , 1995 .

[29]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations , 2005 .

[30]  R. Driver,et al.  Small-Group Discussion in Physics: Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours. , 1996 .

[31]  William F. Brewer,et al.  An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. , 1998 .

[32]  G. Steiner NARCISSUS AND ECHO: A Note on Current Arts of Reading , 1981 .

[33]  A. C. Kruger Peer collaboration: conflict, cooperation, or both? , 1993 .

[34]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom , 2006 .

[35]  Michael Billig,et al.  Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology , 1987 .

[36]  B. Rogoff Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[37]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past , 2002 .

[38]  Reuben Hersh,et al.  18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics , 2013 .

[39]  M. Baker,et al.  Computer-Mediated Epistemic Dialogue: Explanation and Argumentation as Vehicles for Understanding Scientific Notions , 2002 .

[40]  Erna Yackel,et al.  What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation , 2002 .

[41]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .

[42]  Anat Zohar,et al.  Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .

[43]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Proofs and Refutations: Frontmatter , 1976 .

[44]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[46]  Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos,et al.  Modelling mathematical argumentation: the importance of qualification , 2007 .

[47]  Learning processes within and between successive activities in a laboratory context , 2008 .

[48]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning , 1997 .

[49]  D. Kuhn How do People Know? , 2001, Psychological science.

[50]  N. Mercer,et al.  Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom , 1999 .

[51]  Mario Carretero,et al.  Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences , 1994 .

[52]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Children’s Understanding of Stories: A Basis for Moral Judgment and Dilemma Resolution , 1982 .

[53]  P. Cobb,et al.  Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics. , 1996 .

[54]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[55]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications From Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[56]  R. Glaser Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[57]  Merrilee H. Salmon,et al.  Reasoning in Conversation , 1993 .

[58]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Two Wrongs May Make a Right ... If They Argue Together! , 2000 .

[59]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The Blind and the Paralytic: Supporting argumentation in Everyday and Scientific Issues , 2003 .

[60]  J. Pelc Semiotic and Nonsemiotic Concepts of Meaning , 1982 .

[61]  C. Miller,et al.  A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning , 1993 .

[62]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  How students use texts to learn and reason about historical uncertainty , 1994 .

[64]  Harvey Siegel,et al.  The rationality of science, critical thinking, and science education , 1989, Synthese.

[65]  Raymond Duval,et al.  Structure du raisonnement deductif et apprentissage de la demonstration , 1991 .

[66]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Substituting one mystery for another: the role of self-explanations in solving algebra word-problems , 2000 .

[67]  C. Antaki Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts , 1994 .

[68]  David R. Olson,et al.  Modes of thought : explorations in culture and cognition , 1996 .

[69]  J. Greeno On Claims That Answer the Wrong Questions , 1997 .

[70]  C. Garvey,et al.  Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts1 , 1981 .

[71]  Dietmar Küchemann,et al.  Students' understandings of logical implication , 2002 .

[72]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  On the Uses of Rigorous Proof. (Book Reviews: Proofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery) , 1977 .

[73]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory , 2007 .

[74]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Collective Reading of Multiple Texts in Argumentative Activities. , 2003 .

[75]  Kurt W. Fischer,et al.  Development in context : acting and thinking in specific environments , 1993 .

[76]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Reflective Processes in a Mathematics Classroom With a Rich Learning Environment , 1999 .

[77]  P. Tetlock The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[78]  D. Kuhn Thinking as Argument , 1992 .

[79]  N. Douek Argumentation and Conceptualization in Context: a Case Study on Sunshadows in Primary School , 1999 .

[80]  A. Flew,et al.  Patterns of Discovery. , 1961 .

[81]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Participating in Classroom Mathematical Practices , 2001 .

[82]  Victor Goldschmidt,et al.  28. Perelman (Ch.) et Olbrechts-Tyteca (L.). La nouvelle rhétorique ; Traité de l'Argumentation (Coll. Logos). Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1958 , 1958 .

[83]  G. Pólya Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning , 1958 .

[84]  J. Lemke Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[85]  D. Maynard How children start arguments , 1985, Language in Society.

[86]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Science, the very idea , 1988 .

[87]  Stephanie D. Teasley The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. , 1995 .

[88]  Paul Cobb,et al.  The emergence of mathematical meaning : interaction in classroom cultures , 2009 .

[89]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[90]  J. Wertsch The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[91]  D. Zeidler The central role of fallacious thinking in science education , 1997 .

[92]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[93]  B. Schwarz,et al.  Analyses of Activity Design in Geometry in the Light of Student Actions , 2002 .

[94]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Construction of Collective and Individual Knowledge in Argumentative Activity , 2003 .

[95]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The Role of Task Design and Argumentation in Cognitive Development during Peer Interaction: The Case of Proportional Reasoning. , 2007 .

[96]  C. Pontecorvo,et al.  Arguing and Reasoning in Understanding Historical Topics , 1993 .

[97]  M. Ferro,et al.  The Use and Abuse of History: Or How the past Is Taught , 1986 .

[98]  Maya Hickmann,et al.  Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought , 1989 .

[99]  Tsafrir Goldberg,et al.  Living and dormant collective memories as contexts of history learning , 2008 .

[100]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[101]  Kpe Koeno Gravemeijer Educational Development and Developmental Research in Mathematics Education , 1994 .

[102]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The antilogos ability to evaluate information supporting arguments , 2005 .

[103]  Raymond S. Nickerson Reflections on Reasoning , 1986 .

[104]  N. Mercer,et al.  From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development , 1999 .