Chapter Four - Using Multidimensional Encoding and Retrieval Contexts to Enhance Our Understanding of Stochastic Dependence in Source Memory

Abstract In this chapter, we review and interpret research on multidimensional source memory paradigms. We focus in particular on research in which two source dimensions (e.g., color and location of a word stimulus), or features, or context attributes, are encoded and subsequently retrieved. We cover some of the basic empirical outcomes of interest, notably the finding of stochastic dependence among retrieval of source dimensions. Such dependence implies that retrieval of one source dimension is related to the retrievability of the other source dimension. Many research papers have established that stochastic dependence is supported by encoding factors that help bind items to context, and perhaps even context to context. Yet the finding of, and degree of, stochastic dependence at retrieval does not always relate predictably to other manipulations, such as when people are focused on one or the other source dimension in an encoding phase. Moreover, other theoretical proposals target retrieval processes, apart from encoding processes, as producing such dependence. Research that has included retrieval manipulations, such as external cuing of source dimensions at test, suggests that retrieval-specific causes of stochastic dependence have not been established. We also discuss other paradigms that are relevant to the retrieval of multiple object features and whether their retrieval is dependent or independent of one another. Mixed evidence results from this work, with some arguing for relative independence of object features, but others arguing for strong associative relationships among elements that predict somewhat all-or-none retrieval of items and their contexts or features (i.e., dependence). We attempt to integrate these various research paradigms and draw some broad, albeit tentative, conclusions about this collective work. We also suggest areas of research that should be considered as future work in multidimensional source memory.

[1]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  An analysis of the visual component in recognition memory for verbal stimuli , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Sean M. Lane,et al.  Source Misattributions and the Suggestibility of Eyewitness Memory , 1994 .

[3]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Tracking conversational repetition: an evaluation of target monitoring ability , 2006 .

[4]  Kevin Murnane,et al.  When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[5]  F. Craik,et al.  The Effect of Speaker's Voice on Word Recognition , 1974 .

[6]  Emma Y. Wu,et al.  Storage and binding of object features in visual working memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Brian P. Kurilla,et al.  Source memory for unidentified stimuli. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  M. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. , 1996 .

[10]  J. Gardiner Functional aspects of recollective experience , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Cinthya Estrada-Manilla,et al.  Event-related potential variations in the encoding and retrieval of different amounts of contextual information , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  Kevin Murnane,et al.  A global activation approach to the effect of changes in environmental context on recognition. , 1993 .

[13]  T. Meiser,et al.  The role of attention for context-context binding of intrinsic and extrinsic features. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Independence of memory for categorically different colors and shapes , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  A P Shimamura,et al.  Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Noncriterial Recollection Influences Metacognitive Monitoring and Control Processes , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  D. Schacter,et al.  Source memory: extending the boundaries of age-related deficits. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[18]  Thorsten Meiser,et al.  Bound context features are integrated at encoding , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  M. Rugg ERP studies of memory. , 1995 .

[20]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Brain Potentials during Memory Retrieval Provide Neurophysiological Support for the Distinction between Conscious Recollection and Priming , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Visual Long-Term Memory Has the Same Limit on Fidelity as Visual Working Memory , 2013, Psychological science.

[22]  J. Starns,et al.  Internal reinstatement hides cuing effects in source memory tasks , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Marc W Howard,et al.  Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  E. Tulving Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[25]  C. Sattler,et al.  Boundaries of the relation between conscious recollection and source memory for perceptual details , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[26]  Jeffrey J Starns,et al.  Context attributes in memory are bound to item information, but not to one another , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers,et al.  Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: application of the SAM model , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  J. Hicks,et al.  The effect of general knowledge on source memory and decision processes , 2003 .

[29]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Independent retrieval of source dimensions: an extension of results by Starns and Hicks (2005) and a comment on the ACSIM measure. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  R. Marsh,et al.  Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes , 1998 .

[31]  U. Bayen,et al.  An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[32]  M. Masson Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[33]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Episodic Encoding Is More than the Sum of Its Parts: An fMRI Investigation of Multifeatural Contextual Encoding , 2006, Neuron.

[34]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Thorsten Meiser,et al.  Analyzing stochastic dependence of cognitive processes in multidimensional source recognition. , 2014, Experimental psychology.

[37]  Joseph D. Allen,et al.  Test modality affects source monitoring and event-related potentials. , 2003, The American journal of psychology.

[38]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context and human memory , 1978 .

[39]  R. Marsh,et al.  Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Neil Burgess,et al.  The Associative Structure of Memory for Multi-Element Events , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  Jeffrey J Starns,et al.  Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  E. Wilding In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[43]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Feature memory and binding in young and older adults , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Steven M. Smith Remembering In and Out of Context , 1979 .

[45]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Age differences in using source-relevant cues. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[46]  R. Marsh,et al.  Focused attention on one contextual attribute does not reduce source memory for a different attribute , 2004, Memory.

[47]  Lynne M Reder,et al.  Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: The role of contextual fan , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[48]  G. Bower,et al.  A propositional theory of recognition memory , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[49]  K. Malmberg,et al.  Context-dependent recognition memory: the ICE theory. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  E. Tulving Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[51]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Aging and single versus multiple cues in source monitoring. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[52]  Angel Fernandez,et al.  Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[53]  J. Starns,et al.  Successful cuing of gender source memory does not improve location source memory , 2016, Memory & cognition.

[54]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Real-world objects are not represented as bound units: independent forgetting of different object details from visual memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[55]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Noncriterial Recollection: Familiarity as Automatic, Irrelevant Recollection , 1996, Consciousness and Cognition.

[56]  Thorsten Meiser,et al.  Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  Are there long-term "literal copies" of visually presented words? , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[58]  T. Meiser,et al.  Conscious recollection and binding among context features , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[59]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Destination Memory Stop Me if I’ve Told You This Before , 2022 .

[60]  K. Murnane,et al.  EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN RELATIVE CUE STRENGTH ON CONTEXT-DEPENDENT RECOGNITION , 1995 .

[61]  Noelle L Brown,et al.  Source memory for unrecognized items: Predictions from multivariate signal detection theory , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[62]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[63]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Selecting for Memory? The Influence of Selective Attention on the Mnemonic Binding of Contextual Information , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  R. Marsh,et al.  Comparisons of target output monitoring and source input monitoring , 2002 .

[65]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Illusory recollection of voices , 2004, Memory.

[66]  Gregory V. Jones A fragmentation hypothesis of memory: Cued recall of pictures and of sequential position. , 1976 .

[67]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Memory for multidimensional source information. , 2002 .

[68]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. , 1990 .

[69]  L. Robertson Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[70]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. , 2011, Journal of vision.